|
Volumn 98, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 508-510
|
Negative Women's Health Initiative findings stir consternation, debate among researchers.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CALCIUM DERIVATIVE;
ESTROGEN;
GESTAGEN;
VITAMIN D;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BREAST TUMOR;
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
DISABLED PERSON;
ESTROGEN THERAPY;
FAT INTAKE;
FEEDING BEHAVIOR;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
LIFESTYLE;
MASS MEDIUM;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
PERSONNEL;
POSTMENOPAUSE;
POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
UNITED STATES;
WOMEN'S HEALTH;
AGED;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CALCIUM COMPOUNDS;
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES;
DIETARY FATS;
DISABLED PERSONS;
ESTROGEN REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
ESTROGENS;
FEMALE;
FOOD HABITS;
HUMANS;
LIFE STYLE;
MASS MEDIA;
MIDDLE AGED;
MULTICENTER STUDIES;
OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL;
POSTMENOPAUSE;
PROGESTINS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RESEARCH PERSONNEL;
UNITED STATES;
VITAMIN D;
WOMEN'S HEALTH;
|
EID: 33646451230
PISSN: None
EISSN: 14602105
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj172 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (0)
|