Effects of eye dominance in visual perception

International Congress Series

Volumn 1282, Issue , 2005, Pages 719-723

  Shneor, Einat ^a   Hochstein, Shaul ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Eye dominance; Feature search; Pop out; Visual acuity; Visual search

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646449971     PISSN: 05315131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2005.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Coren S., and Porac C. Ocular dominance: an annotated bibliography. Journal supplement abstract service. Catal. Sel. Doc. Psychol. 5 (1975) 229-230
2. Porac C., and Coren S. The dominant eye. Psychol. Bull. 83 5 (1976) 880-897
3. Mapp A.P., Oho H., and Barbeito R. What does the dominant eye dominate? A brief and somewhat contentious review. Percept. Psychophys. 65 2 (2003) 310-317
4. Coren S., and Kaplan C.P. Patterns of ocular dominance. Am. J. Optom. Arch. Am. Acad. Optom. 50 4 (1973) 283-292
5. Walls G.L. A theory of ocular dominance. A.M.A. Arch. Ophthalmol. 45 4 (1951) 387-412
6. Money J. Studies on the functioning of sighting dominance. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 24 4 (1972) 454-464
7. Roth H.L., Lora A.N., and Heilman K.M. Effects of monocular viewing and eye dominance on spatial attention. Brain 125 Pt. 9 (2002) 2023-2035
8. Sampson H., and Spong P. Handedness, eye-dominance, and immediate memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 13 (1962) 173-180
9. Minucci P.K., and Conners M.M. Reaction time under three viewing conditions: binocular, dominant eye, and non dominant eye. J. Exp. Psychol. 67 (1964) 268-275
10. Wade N.J. Monocular and binocular rivalry between contours. Perception 4 1 (1975) 85-95
11. Porac C., and Coren S. Monocular asymmetries in recognition after an eye movement: sighting dominance and dextrality. Percept. Psychophys. 25 1 (1979) 55-59
12. Buchert M., et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for binocular interactions in human visual cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 145 3 (2002) 334-339
13. Treisman A., and Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn. Psychol. 12 (1980) 97-136
14. Treisman A. Psychological issues in selective attention. In: Gazzaniga M.S. (Ed). The Cognitive Neurosciences vol. III (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 529-544
15. Durand A.C., and Gould G.M. A method of determining ocular dominance. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 55 (1910) 369-370
16. D.M. Green, J.A. Swets, Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley 1966; Huntington, NY: Krieger, 1974.
17. Coren S., and Porac C. Monocular asymmetries in visual latency as a function of sighting dominance. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt. 59 12 (1982) 987-990