Use of the LMA-ProSeal® in an experimental pig model - A potential animal model for laryngeal mask airway research: Results of a pilot study

Anasthesiologie Intensivmedizin Notfallmedizin Schmerztherapie

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 223-227

  Goldmann, Kai ^a   Kalinowski, M ^a   Dieterich, J ^a   Wulf, H ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Aspiration; Experimental animal model; Laryngeal mask airway; Pharyngo laryngeal morbidity; Positive pressure ventilation

Indexed keywords

AIRWAY CONDUCTANCE; AIRWAY PRESSURE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; BRONCHOSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; LARYNGEAL MASK; NONHUMAN; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; SWINE; TIDAL VOLUME; ANESTHESIA; ANIMAL; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; BODY POSTURE; LUNG FUNCTION TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; SUPINE POSITION;

ANESTHESIA; ANIMALS; BLOOD GAS ANALYSIS; LARYNGEAL MASKS; PILOT PROJECTS; POSITIVE-PRESSURE RESPIRATION; PRONE POSITION; RESPIRATORY FUNCTION TESTS; SUPINE POSITION; SWINE;

EID: 33646446298     PISSN: 09392661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-924992     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Brimacombe JR, Brain AIJ, Berry AM. The Laryngeal Mask Airway: A review and practical guide. London: W.B. Saunders, 1997
2. Verghese C, Smith TGC, Young E. Prospective survey of the use of the laryngeal mask airway in 2359 patients. Anaesthesia 1993; 48: 58-60
3. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Shyr M. ProSeal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 824-827
4. Maltby RJ, Beriault MT, Watson NC, Liepert DJ, Pick GH. LMA-Classic™ and LMA-ProSeal™ are effective alternatives to endotracheal intubation for gynecologic laparoscopy. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 71-77
5. Reid LM. Needs for animal models of human diseases of the respiratory system. Am J Pathol 1980; 101 (Suppl 3): 89-101
6. Kurita T, Morita K, Kazama T, Sato S. Comparison of isoflurane and propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia in a swine model of asphyxia. Br J Anaesth 2003; 91: 871-877
7. Takala RSK, Soukka HR, Salo MS, Kirvelä OA, Kääpä PO, Rajamäki AA, Riutta A, Aantaa RE. Pulmonary inflammatory mediators after sevoflurane and thiopentone anaesthesia in pigs. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004; 48: 40-45
8. Wemyss-Holden SA, Porter KJ, Baxter P, Rudkin GE, Maddern GJ. The laryngeal mask airway in experimental pig anaesthesia. Lab Anim 1999; 33: 30-34
9. Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of the laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 457
10. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K, Morris R. Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 286-287
11. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA "ProSeal" - a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2002; 84: 650-654
12. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Loeckinger A. Does the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? A cadaveric study. Anesth Analg 2000; 91: 1017-1020
13. Mark DA. Protection from aspiration with the LMA-ProSeal™ after vomiting: a case report. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 78-80
14. Evans NR, Llewellyn RL, Gardner SV, James MFM. Aspiration prevented by the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway: a case report. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 413-416
15. Cooper RM. The LMA. Laparoscopic surgery and the obese patient - can vs. should. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 5-10
16. Peters J. Alternatives to endotracheal intubation: a matter of statistics? Anesthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 2004; 39: 125-126
17. Voyagis GS, Dimitriou VK, Kyriakis KP. Comparative evaluation of the prolonged use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16: 371-375
18. Brimacombe J, Archdeacon J. The LMA for unplanned prolonged procedures. Can J Anaesth 1995; 42: 1176-1179
19. Gandini D, Brimacombe J. Laryngeal mask airway for ventilatory support over a 4-day period in a neonate with Pierre Robin sequence. Paed Anaesth 2003; 13: 181
20. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Lirk P, Puhringer F. Failed obstetric tracheal intubation and postoperative respiratory support with the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Anesth Analg 2004; 98: 1467-1470
21. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers versus paralysed anaesthetized patients: ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, intracuff pressures and anatomic position. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16: 699-701
22. Bateman L, Ludders JW, Gleed RD, Erb HN. Use of the laryngeal mask airway in rabbits during isoflurane anaesthesia. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 30: 117
23. Brietzke SE, Mair EA. Laryngeal mask versus endotracheal tube in a ferret model. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001; 110: 827-833
24. Martins RH, Braz JR, Defaveri J, Gregório EA, Abud TMV. Effect of high laryngeal mask airway intracuff pressures on the laryngopharyngeal mucosa of dogs. Laryngoscope 2000; 110: 645-650
25. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask. A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000; 93: 104-109
26. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Pühringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: 770-776
27. Cook TM, Nolan JP, Verghese C, Strube PJ, Less M, Millar JM, Baske PJ. Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalyzed anaesthetized patients. Br J Anaesth 2002; 88: 527-533