"Tastes worse"-"More filling": Surgical controversy, but who decides?

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 4-5

  Kral, John G ^a  

^a SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIATRIC SURGERY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GASTRIC BANDING; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LONG TERM CARE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; ROUX Y ANASTOMOSIS; STOMACH BYPASS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; GASTRIC BYPASS; GASTROPLASTY; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 33646444587     PISSN: 15507289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2005.10.007     Document Type: Editorial

References (2)

1. Ternovits C.A., Tichansky D.S., and Madan A.K. Band versus bypass. randomization and patients' choices and perceptions. SOARD 1 (2006) 6-10
2. Kral J.G., Dixon J.B., Horber F.F., Rössner S., Stiles S., Torgerson J.S., et al. Flaws in evidence-based medicine methodologies may adversely affect public health directives. Surgery 137 (2005) 279-284