Ecological footprint model and its research advances

Chinese Journal of Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 334-339

  Liu, Miao ^a,b   Hu, Yuanman ^a   Li, Yuehui ^a   Chang, Yu ^a   Zhang, Wei ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF APPLIED ECOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Development trend; Ecological footprint; Energy footprint; Research advance

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 33646442201     PISSN: 10004890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Chinese source. 2003. 23(2):125-132.
2. Chinese source. 2004. 14(3):49-53.
3. Chinese source. 2003. 23(6):656-660.
4. Chinese source. 2001. 23(2):164-169.
5. Chinese source. 2001. 56(5):599-610.
6. Chinese source. 2003. 23(3):291-298.
7. Chinese source. 2003. 14(2):317-320.
8. Chinese source. 2002. 39(3):441-445.
9. Chinese source. 2000. 55(5):607-616.
10. Chinese source. 2004. 21(2):181-185.
11. Chinese source. 2003. 22(5):654-662.
12. Chinese source. 2004. 21(3):1-5.
13. Chinese source. 2004. 19(3):39-42.
14. Chinese source. 2004. 15(5):827-832.
15. Adrew D, Anette R, Christian T. 2003. Historical footprints in contemporary land use systems: forest cover changes in savannah woodlands in the Sudano - Sahelian zone [J]. Global. Environ. Change., 13(4):235-254.
16. Ayres R. 2000. Commentary on the utility of the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecol. Econ., 32:347-349.
17. Bicknell KB, Ball R, Cullen R, et al. 1998. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy [J]. Ecol. Econ., 27(2):149-160.
18. Costanza R. 2000. The dynamics of the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecol. Econ., 32(3):341-345.
19. Erb KH. 2004. Actual land demand of Austria 1926-2000: A variation on ecological Footprint assessments [J]. Land Use Policy., 21(3):247-259.
20. Ferng JJ. 2002. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints [J]. Ecol. Econ., 40(1):53-69.
21. Haberl H, Erb KH, Krausmann F. 2001. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: The case of Austria 1926-1995[J]. Ecol. Econ., 38(1):25-45.
22. Haberl H. 1997. Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: Implications for sustainable development [J]. Ambio, 26(3):143-146.
23. Hanley H, Moffatt I, Faichney R, et al. 1999. Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland [J]. Ecol. Econ., 28(1):55-73.
24. Hanley H, Wackernagel M, Krausmann F, et al. 2004. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: A comparison [J]. Land Use Policy., 21(3):193-198.
25. Herendeen RA. 2000. Ecological footprint is a vivid indicator of indirect effects [J]. Ecol. Econ., 32(3):357-358.
26. Krausmann F. 2001. land use and industrial modernization: An empirical analysis of human influence on the functioning of ecosystems in Austria 1830-1995 [J]. Land Use Policy., 18 (1):17-26.
27. Krausmann F, Habel H. 2002. The process of industrialization from the perspective of energetic metabolism, socioeconomic energy flows in Austria 1830-1995[J]. Ecol. Econ., 41(2)177-201.
28. Krotscheck C. 1995. Prozessbewertung in der nachhaltigen Wirtschaft [M]. Dissertation an der Technischen Universität Graz.
29. Lenzen M, Murray SA. 2001. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia [J]. Ecol. Econ., 37(2):229-255.
30. Luck MA, Jenerette GD, Wu J, et al. 2001. The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint [J]. Ecosystems, 4:782-796.
31. Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D. 2004. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments [J]. Land Use Policy., 21(3):231-246.
32. Sanderson E, Jaiteh M, Levy M, et al. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild [J]. BioScience, 52(10):891-904.
33. Schimel DS, House JI, Hibbard KA, et al. 2001. Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems [J]. Nature, 414(6860):169-172.
34. Sedjo RA. 1992. Temperate forest ecosystems in the global carbon cycle [J]. Ambio, 21(4):274-277.
35. Sitch S, Smith B, Prentice IC. 2003. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model [J]. Glob. Change Biol., 9 (2):161-185.
36. Stöglehner G. 2003. Ecological footprint - A tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies [J]. J. Clean Prod., 11:267-277.
37. van den Bergh JCJM. Verbruggen H. 1999. An evaluation of the ecological footprint: Reply to Wcakernagel and Ferguson [J]. Ecol. Econ., 31(4):319-321.
38. van den Bergh JCJM, Verbruggen H. 1999. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: An evaluation of the "ecological footprint" [J]. Ecol. Econ., 29(1):61-72.
39. van Vuuren DP, Smeets EMW. 2000. Ecological footprints of Benin Bhutan, Costa Rica, and the Netherlands [J]. Ecol. Econ., 34(1):115-130.
40. Vitousek PM, Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH, et al. 1986. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis [J]. BioScience, 36 (6):363-373.
41. Wackernagel M, Chad M, Erb KH. 2004. Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: Comparing the conventional approach to 'actual land area' approach [J]. Land Use Policy., 21(3):261-269.
42. Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Hansson CB. 1999. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint applications in Weden and subregions [J]. Ambio, 28(7):604-612.
43. Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz CB, et al. 2004. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: Resolving conceptual challenges [J]. Land Use Policy., 21(3):271-278.
44. Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecol. Econ., 29(3):375-390.
45. Wackernagel M, Rees W. 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth [M]. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.