Valuing ancient forest ecosystems: An analysis of backcountry hiking in Jasper National Park

Ecological Economics

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 665-678

  Englin, Jeffrey E ^a   McDonald, Jered M ^a   Moeltner, Klaus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ancient forests; Backpacking; Forest attributes; Random coefficients; Random utility models

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; VALUATION; WELFARE ECONOMICS; WOODLAND;

ALBERTA; CANADA; JASPER NATIONAL PARK; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 33646436986     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.022     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barlow R.E., Bremner J.M., and Brunk H.D. Statistical Inference Under Order Restrictions (1972), John Wiley & Sons, New York
2. Boxall P.C., Watson D.O., and Englin J. Backcountry recreationists' valuation of forest and park management features in wilderness parks of the western Canadian shield. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26 6 (1996) 982-990
3. Brownstone D., and Train K. Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics 89 (1999) 109-129
4. Chen H.Z., and Cosslett S.R. Environmental quality preference and benefit estimation in multinomial probit models: a simulation approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 3 (1998) 512-520 (August)
5. Englin J., and Lambert D. Measuring angling quality in count data models of recreational fishing. Environmental and Resource Economics 6 4 (1995) 389-399 (December)
6. Englin J., and Mendelsohn R. A hedonic travel cost analysis for valuation of multiple components of site quality: the recreation value of forest management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 21 3 (1991) 275-290 (November)
7. Englin J., Boxall P., and Hauer G. An empirical examination of optimal rotations in a multiple-use forest in the presence of fire risk. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25 1 (2000) 14-27 (July)
8. Hanemann W.M. Welfare analysis with discrete choice models. In: Herriges J.A., and Kling C.L. (Eds). Valuing Recreation and the Environment: Revealed Preference Methods in Theory and Practice (1999), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K. Northampton, Mass
9. Hanley N., Wright R., and Adamowicz V. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and Resource Economics 11 3-4 (1998) 413-428
10. Layton D.F. Random coefficient models for stated preference surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 40 (2000) 21-36
11. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P. (Ed). Frontiers in Econometrics (1974), Academic Press, New York
12. Pendleton L., and Mendelsohn R. Estimating recreation preferences using hedonic travel cost and random utility models. Environmental and Resource Economics 17 1 (2000) 89-108 (September)
13. Pendleton L., Sohngen B., Mendelsohn R., and Holmes T. Measuring environmental quality in the southern Appalachian mountains. Forest Science 44 4 (1998) 603-609
14. Reed W. Effects of the risk of fire on the optimal rotation of a forest. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11 2 (1984) 180-190 (June)
15. Reed W.J. The decision to conserve or harvest old-growth forest. Ecological Economics 8 (1993) 45-69
16. Rensburg T.M.v., Mill G.A., Common M., and Lovett J. Preferences and multiple use forest management. Ecological Economics 43 2-3 (2002) 231-244 (December)
17. Scarpa R., Chilton S.M., Hutchinson W.G., and Buongiorno J. Valuing the recreational benefits from the creation of nature reserves in Irish forests. Ecological Economics 33 2 (2000) 237-250 (May)
18. Shonkwiler J.S., and Hanley N. A new approach to random utility modeling using the Dirichlet multinomial distribution. Environmental and Resource Economics 26 3 (2003) 401-416 (November)
19. Train K. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics 74 2 (1998) 230-239
20. Vuong Q.H. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57 2 (1989) 307-333 (March)
21. White H. Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica 50 1 (1982) 1-25 (January)