Estimating home energy decision parameters for a hybrid energy-economy policy model

Environmental Modeling and Assessment

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 91-100

  Jaccard, Mark ^a   Dennis, Margo ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bottom up energy model; Discrete choice survey; Household energy demand; Hybrid energy model

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

BEHAVIORAL PARAMETERS; CONDITIONING SYSTEMS; DISCRETE CHOICE; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; ENERGY MODEL; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY DEMANDS; HYBRID ENERGY; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

HEATING;

AIR CONDITIONING; BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENERGY POLICY; HEATING; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY MAKING; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE;

EID: 33646435069     PISSN: 14202026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-005-9036-0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. C. Bohringer, The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down in energy policy modeling, Energy Econ. 20(3) (1998) 233-248.
2. D. Gately, Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables: comment, Bell J. Econ. 11(1) (1980) 372-374.
3. J.A. Hausman, Individual discount rates and the purchase and utilization of energy-using durables, Bell J. Econ. 10(1) (1979) 33-54.
4. R.B. Hutton and W.L. Wilkie, Life cycle cost: a new form of consumer information, J. Consum. Res. 6(March) (1980) 349-359.
5. 2 emission reductions costs in the residential sector: behavioral parameters in a bottom-up simulation model, Energy J. 17(4) (1996) 107-134.
6. M. Jaccard, J. Nyboer, C. Bataille and B. Sadownik, Modeling the cost of climate policy: distinguishing between alternative cost definitions and long-run cost dynamics, Energy J. 24(1) (2003) 49-73.
7. H.K. Jacobsen, Integrating the bottom-up and top-down approach to energy-economy modeling: the case of Denmark, Energy Econ. 20(4) (1998) 443-461.
8. C.C. Koopmans and D.W. te Velde, Bridging the energy efficiency gap: Using bottom-up information in a top-down energy demand model, Energy Econ. 23(1) (2001) 57-75.
9. A. Loschel, Technological change in economic models of environmental policy: a survey, Ecol. Econ. 43 (2002) 105-126.
10. Marbek Resource Consultants, Building Table Options Report: Residential Sector, Ottawa, National Climate Change Process, 1999.
11. J. Nyboer, Simulating evolution of technology: a case study of strategies to control greenhouse gas emissions in Canada. PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, 1997.
12. D. Revelt and K. Train, Mixed logit with repeated choices: household's choices of appliance efficiency level, Rev. Econ. Stat. LXXX(4)( 1998) 647-657.
13. K. Train, Discount rates in consumers' energy-related decisions: a review of the literature. Energy: Int. J. 10(12) (1985) 1243-1253.
14. K. Train, Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).