Evaluating discourse and dialogue coding schemes

Computational Linguistics

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 289-295

  Craggs, Richard ^a   Wood, Mary Mcgee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODING SCHEME;

EID: 33646434217     PISSN: 08912017     EISSN: 15309312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089120105774321109     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Carletta, Jean. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249-254.
2. Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Education and Psychological Measurement, 43(6):37-46.
3. Di Eugenio, Barbara and Michael Glass. 2004. The kappa statistic: A second look. Computational Linguistics, 30(1):95-101.
4. Jurafsky, Daniel, Elizabeth Shriberg, and Debra Biasca. 1997. Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL shallow-discourse-function annotation coders manual. Technical Report (Draft 13), University of Colorado.
5. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004a. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
6. Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004b. Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3):411-437.
7. Mast, Marion, Heinrich Niemann, Elmar Noth, and Ernst Gunter Sehukat-Talamazzini. 1996. Automatic classification of dialog acts with semantic classification trees and polygrams. In Learning for Natural Language Processing, edited by Stefan Wermter, Ellen Riloff, and Gabriele Scheler. Springer, pages 217-229.
8. Scott, W. A. 1955. Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding. Public Opinion Quarterly, 19:127-141.
9. Siegel, Sidney and John N. Castellan, Jr. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill.
10. Wrede, Britta and Elizabeth Shriberg. 2003. Spotting "hot spots" in meetings: Human judgments and prosodic cues. In Proceedings of EUROSPEECH, Geneva.