An IRT model with a parameter-driven process for change

Psychometrika

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 651-669

  Rijmen, Frank ^a   De Boeck, Paul ^a   Van Der Maas, Han L J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Item response theory; Latent markov model; Panel data

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646432750     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-002-1047-z     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aitkin, M., Anderson, D., & Hinde, J. (1981). Statistical modelling of data on teaching styles. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 144, 419-461.
2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723.
3. Böckenholt, U. (1999). Measuring change: Mixed Markov models for ordinal panel data. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 125-136.
4. Collins, L.M., Fidler, P.L., Wugalter, S.E., & Long, S.E. (1993). Goodness-of-fit testing for latent class models. Mitltivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 375-389.
5. Collins, L.M., & Wugalter, S.E. (1992). Latent class models for stage sequential dynamic latent variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 131-157.
6. Cox, D.R., & Snell, E.J. (1996). Analysis of binary data (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall.
7. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1-38.
8. Eid, M., & Hoffmann, L. (1998). Measuring variability and change with an item response model for polytomous variables. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23, 193-215.
9. Eid, M., & Langeheine, R. (1999). The measurement of consistency and occasion specificity with latent class models: A new model and its applications to the measurement of affect. Psychological Methods, 4, 100-116.
10. Eid, M., & Langeheine, R. (2003). Separating stable from variable individuals in longitudinal studies by mixture distribution models. Measurement, 1, 197-206.
11. Fahrmeir, L., & Tutz, G. (2001). Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Field, D. (1987). A review of preschool conservation training: An analysis of analyses. Developmental Review, 7, 210-251.
13. Fischer, G.H. (1973). Linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 17, 359-374.
14. Formann, A.K. (1985). Constrained latent class models: Theory and applications. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 38, 87-111.
15. Formann, A.K. (1992). Linear logistic latent class analysis for polytomous data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 418, 476-486.
16. Gilmore, R. (1981). Catastrophe theory for scientists and engineers. New York: Wiley.
17. Goodman, L.A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215-231.
18. Hagenaars, J.A. (1998). Categorical causal modeling: Latent class analysis and directed log-linear models with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research. 26, 436-486.
19. Humphreys, K. (1998). The latent Markov chain with multivariate random effects. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 269-299.
20. Jansen, B.R.J., & van der Maas, H.L.J. (2001). Evidence for the phase transition from Rule 1 to Rule II on the balance scale task. Developmental Review, 21, 450-494.
21. Langeheine, R., Pannekoek, J., & van de Pol, F. (1996). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in categorical data analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 24, 492-516.
22. Langeheine, R., & van de Pol, F. (1990). A unifying framework for Markov modelling in discrete space and discrete time. Sociological Methods and Research, 18, 416-441.
23. Langeheine, R., & van de Pol, F. (1994). Discrete-time mixed Markov latent class models. In A. Dale, & R.B. Davies (Eds.), Analyzing social and political change: A casebook of methods. London: Sage.
24. Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
25. McHugh, R.B. (1956). Efficient estimation and local identification in latent class analysis. Psychometrika, 21, 331-347.
26. McLachlan, G., & Krishnan, T. (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. New York: Wiley.
27. McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.
28. Mislevy, R.J., & Verhelst, N. (1990). Modeling item responses when different persons employ different solution strategies. Psychometrika, 55, 195-215.
29. Mislevy, R.J., & Wilson, M. (1996). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for a psychometric model of discontinuous development. Psychometrika. 61, 41-71.
30. Piaget, J. (1960). The general problems of the psychobiological development of the child. In J.M. Tanner, & B. Inhelder (Eds.), Discussions on child development (Vol. 4). London: Tavistock.
31. Poulsen, C.S. (1990). Mixed Markov and latent Markov modeling applied to brand choice data. International Journal of Marketing, 7, 5-19.
32. Read, T., & Cressie, N. (1988). Goodness-of-fit statistics for discrete multivariate data. New York: Springer Verlag.
33. Rijmen, F., & De Boeck, P. (2003). A latent class model for individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals. Psychological Research, 67, 219-231.
34. Rijmen, F., Tuerlinckx, F., De Boeck, P., & Kuppens, P. (2003). A nonlinear mixed model framework for IRT models. Psychological Methods, 8, 185-205.
35. Ross, S. (1996). Stochastic processes (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
36. Rost, J. (1990). Rasch models in latent classes: An integration of two approaches to item analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 271-282.
37. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph, 17.
38. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimensions of a model. Annals of Statistics. 6, 461-464.
39. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
40. Steyer, R., Ferring, D., & Schmitt, M. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 2, 79-98.
41. Thom, R. (1975). Sructural stability and morphogenesis. Reading, MA: Benjamin.
42. Thomas, H., & Hettmansperger, T.P. (2001). Modeling change in cognitive understanding with finite mixtures. Applied Statistics, 50, 435-448.
43. van der Maas, H. (1993). Catastrophe analysis of stagewise cognitive development: Model, method and applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Amsterdam.
44. van der Maas, H., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1992). Stagewise cognitive development: An application of catastrophe theory. Psychological Review, 99, 395-417.
45. van der Maas, H.L.J., & Molenaar, P.C.M. (1995). Catastrophe analysis of discontinuous development. In A. A von Eye, & C.C. Clogg (Eds.), Categorical variables in developmental research methods of analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
46. Verbeke, G. (1997). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. In G. Verbeke, & G. Molenberghs (Eds.), Linear mixed models in practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
47. Verhelst, N.D., & Glas, C.A.W. (1993). A dynamic generalization of the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 58, 395-415.
48. von Davier, M. (1997). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit statistics for sparse categorical data: Results of a Monte Carlo study. Methods of Psychological Research [On-line serial], 2, 29-48. Available http://www.mpr-online.de/.
49. Wiggins, L.M. (1973). Panel analysis: Latent probability models for attitude and behavior processes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
50. Wilson, M. (1989). Saltus: A psychometric model of discontinuity in cognitive development. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 276-289.