Environmental education and curriculum theory

Journal of Environmental Education

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 25-35

  Payne, Phillip G ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Curriculum theory; Embodiment; Environmental education (EE); Experience; Inquiry; Phenomenology; Situated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646426948     PISSN: 00958964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JOEE.37.2.25-35     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bauman, Z. (1997). Postmodernity and its discontents. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
3. Bentley, M., Fien, J., & Neil, C. (2004). Sustainable consumption: Young Australians as agents of change. Canberra, Australia: National Youth Affairs Research Scheme.
4. Berryman, T. (1999). Relieving modern day atlas of an illusory burden. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4, 50-68.
5. Bowers, C. (1993). Education, cultural myths, and the ecological crisis, Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
6. Bowerbank, S. (1999). Nature writing as self-technology. In E. Darier (Ed.), Discourses of the environment (pp. 163-178). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
7. Brady, I. (2005). Poetics for a planet: Discourse on some problems of being-in-place. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 979-1025). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Brody, M. (1997). Descending the watershed: Rethinking the "place" of curriculum. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 2, 114-131.
9. Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences revisited: A review of research on sources of environmental sensitivity. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11-21.
10. Chawla, E. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15-26.
11. Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999). "If if doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it": A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 95-114.
12. Cronon, W. (Ed.). (1995). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: Norton.
13. Dewey, J. (1938/1988). Experience and education. In J. Boydston (ED.), John Dewey, volume 13: 1938-1939 (pp. 3-62). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. Fien, J. (1993). Environmental education: A pathway to susiainability. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
15. Foley, D., & Valenzuela, A. (2005). Critical ethnography: The politics of collaboration. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 217-234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
17. Gough, S. (2004). Editorial. Case-study research in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 10(1), 3-6.
18. Gruenewald, D. (2003). At home with the other: Reclaiming the ecological roots of development and literacy. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(1), 33-43.
19. Hampel, B., Holdsworth, R., & Boldero, J. (1996). The impact of parental work experiences and education on environmental knowledge, concern and behaviour among adolescents. Environmental Education Research, 2(3), 287-300.
20. Hargrove, E. (1998). After twenty years. Environmental Ethics, 20(4), 339-340.
21. Hart, P., & Nolan, K. (1999). A critical analysis of research in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 34, 1-69.
22. Hart, R. (1997). Children's participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London: Earthscan.
23. Hay, P (2002). Main currents in western environmental thought. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
24. Hicks, D. (1998). Stories of hope: A response to the "psychology of despair." Environmental Education Research, 4(2), 165-176.
25. Huckle, J. (1995). Using television critically in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 1(3), 291-304.
26. Jensen, B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163-178.
27. Jickling, B., & Spork, H. (1998). Education for the environment: A critique. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 309-327.
28. Kahn, P., Jr. (1999). The human relationship with nature: Development and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Kaufman, J., Ewing, M., Hyle, A., Montgomery, D., & Self, P. (2001). Women and nature: Using memory-work to rethink our relationship to the natural world. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 359-378.
30. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
31. Le Grange, L. (2004). Embodiment, social praxis and environmental education: Some thoughts. Environmental Education Research, 10(3), 387-400.
32. Lincoln, Y. (2005). Institutional review boards and methodological conservatism: The challenge to and from phenomenological paradigms. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 165-181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Lombardo, T. (1987). The reciprocity of perceiver and environment: The evolution of James J. Gibson's ecological psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Lopez, B. (1986). Arctic dreams: Imagination and desire in a northern landscape. New York: Bantam.
35. Lotz-Sisitka, H. (2004). Editorial. Environmental education research and social change: Southern African perspectives. Environmental Education Research, 10(3), 291-296.
36. Loughland, T., Reid, A., Walker, K., & Petocz, P. (2003). Factors influencing young people's conceptions of environment. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 3-20.
37. Lousley, C. (1999). De(politicising) the environmental club: Environmental discourses and the culture of schooling. Environmental Education Research, 5(3), 293-304.
38. MacEachren, Z. (2000). Grafting as practice of relating to the natural world. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 186-199.
39. Macnaghten, P. (2003). Embodying the environment in everyday life practices. The Sociological Review, 57(1), 63-84.
40. Malone, K. (1999). Environmental education researchers as activists. Environmental Education Research, 5(2), 163-178.
41. Malone, K., & Tranter, P. (2003). School grounds as sites for learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities. Environmental Education Research, 9(3), 283-304.
42. McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2003). EE/ESD: Defusing the worry. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 117-128.
43. Melucci, A. (1996). The playing self: Person and meaning in the planetary society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44. Merchant, C. (1980). The death of nature: Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Michael, M. (2000). These boots are made for walking . . . : Mundane technology, the body and human-environment relations. Body and Society, 6(3-4), 107-126.
46. Newbery, L. (2003). Will any/body carry that canoe? A geography of the body, ability and gender. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8, 204-216.
47. O'Loughlin, M. (1997). Corporeal subjectivities: Merleau-Ponty, education and the "postmodern" subject. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 29(1), 20-31.
48. O'Loughlin, M. (1998). Paying attention to bodies in education: Theoretical resources and practical suggestions. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 30(3), 275-297.
49. Orr, D. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
50. Palmer, J. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. New York: Routledge.
51. Payne, P. (1995). Ontology and the critical discourse of environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 11, 83-106.
52. Payne, P. (1997). Embodiment and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 133-153.
53. Payne, P. (1998). Children's conceptions of nature. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 19-27.
54. Payne, P. (1999a). Postmodern challenges and modern horizons: Education "for being for the environment." Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 5-34.
55. Payne, P. (1999b). The significance of experience in SLE research. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 365-381.
56. Payne, P. (2000). Identity and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 7(1), 67-88.
57. Payne, P. (2002a). On the construction, deconstruction and reconstruction of experience in critical outdoor education. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 6(2), 4-21.
58. Payne, P. (2002b). Post-metatheorizing environmental behaviours in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 307-314.
59. Payne, P. (2003a). Postphenomenological enquiry and living the environmental condition. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8, 169-190.
60. Payne, P. (2003b). The technics of environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 525-541.
61. Payne, P. (2005a). Families, homes and environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 21, 81-96.
62. Payne, P. (2005b) "Ways of doing" learning, teaching and researching. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 108-124.
63. Petitot, J., Varela, F., Pachoud, B., & Roy, J.-M. (1999). Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
64. Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York: Routledge.
65. Powers, A. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17-32.
66. Robottom, I., & Hart, P. (1993). Research in environmental education: Engaging the debate. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
67. Rickinson, M. (2001). Learners and learning in environmental education: A critical review of the evidence. Environmental Education Research, 7(3), 207-320.
68. Russell, C., & Hart, P. (2003). Editorial. Exploring new genres of inquiry in environmental education research. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8, 5-8.
69. Scott, W. (1999). Editorial. Five critical commentaries on significant life experience research in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 5(4), 349-351.
70. Scott, W. (2000). Editorial. Qualitative methods of inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 6(1), 5-8.
71. Scott, W. (2003). Editorial. Reviewing research in environmental education: Extended critical reflections. Environmental Education Research, 9(2), 147-148.
72. Seidel, J. (2000). Reading the stones. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 178-185.
73. Snyder, G. (1990). The practice of the wild. San Francisco: North Point Press.
74. Stern, P. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
75. Stewart, K. (2005). Cultural poeisis: The generativity of emergent things. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1027-1042). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76. Strandbu, A., & Krange, O. (2003). Youth and the environmental movement - Symbolic inclusions and exclusions. The Sociological Review, 51(2), 177-198.
77. Sundstrom, R. (2003). Race and place: Social space in the production of human kinds. Philosophy & Geography, 6(1), 83-95.
78. Usher, R., & Edwards, R. (1994). Postmodernism and education. New York: Routledge.
79. Walker, K. (1997). Challenging critical theory in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 155-162.
80. Weiss, G., & Haber, H. (1999). Perspectives on embodiment: The intersections of culture and nature. New York: Routledge.