On identifying knowledge processing requirements

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3729 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 928-943

  Léger, Alain ^a   Nixon, Lyndon J B ^b   Shvaiko, Pavel ^c  

^a ORANGE LABS   (France)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL LIBRARIES; PROBLEM SOLVING; SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ACADEMIA; KNOWLEDGE-BASED TECHNOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY;

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33646416778     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11574620_66     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Rational software corporation, http://www-306.ibm.com/software/rational/.
2. aceMedia project. Integrating knowledge, semantics and content for user centred intelligent media services, http://www.acemedia.org.
3. G. Antoniou, M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, R. Baumgartner, F. Bry, T. Eiter, N. Henze, M. Herzogi W. May, V. Patti, R. Schindlauer, H. Tompits, and S. Schaffert. Reasoning methods for personalization on the Semantic Web. Annals of Mathematics, Computing & Teleinformatics, 2(1):1-24, 2004.
4. B. Benatallah, M.-S. Hacid, A. Léger, C. Rey, and F. Toumani. On automating web services discovery. VLDB Journal, (14(1)):84-96, 2005.
5. A. Billig and K. Sandkuhl. Match-making based on Semantic Nets: The XML-based approach of BaSeWeb. In Proceedings of the workshop on XML-Technologien für das Semantic Web, pages 39-51, 2002.
6. G. Booch, J. Rumbaugh, and I. Jacobson. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley, 1997.
7. R. Dhamankar, Y. Lee, A. Doan, A. Halevy, and P. Domingos, iMAP: Discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In Proceedings of SIGMOD, 2004.
8. T. Di Noia, E. Di Sciascio, F. M. Donini, and M. Mongiello. A system for principled match-making in an electronic marketplace. In Proceedings of WWW, pages 321-330, 2003.
9. D. Dou, D. McDermott, and P. Qi. Ontology translation on the Semantic Web. Journal on Data Semantics, II:35-57, 2005.
10. J. Euzenat and P. Valtchev. Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-lite. In Proceedings of ECAI, pages 333-337, 2004.
11. F. Giunchiglia and P. Shvaiko. Semantic matching. The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal, (18(3)):265-280, 2003.
12. F. Giunchiglia, P. Shvaiko, and M. Yatskevich. Semantic schema matching. In Proceedings of CoopIS, 2005.
13. V. Haarslev, R. Moller, and M. Wessel. RACER: Semantic middleware for industrial projects based on RDF/OWL, a W3C Standard, http://www.sts.tu-harburg. de/~r.f.moeller/racer/.
14. Stanford Medical Informatics. Protégé ontology editor and knowldege aquisition system. http://protege.stanford.edu/index.html.
15. I. Jacobson, G. Booch, and J. Rumbaugh, editors. The unified software development process. Addisson-Wesley, 1999.
16. M. Lenzerini. Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In Proceeding of PODS, pages 233-246, 2002.
17. D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Proceedings of KR, pages 483-493, 2000.
18. E. Mena, V. Kashyap, A. Sheth, and A. Illarramendi. OBSERVER: An approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperability between pre-existing ontologies. In Proceedings of CoopIS, pages 14-25, 1996.
19. L. Nixon, M. Mochol, A. Léger, F. Paulus, L. Rocuet, M. Bonifacio, R. Cuel, M. Jarrar, P. Verheyden, Y. Kompatsiaris, V. Papastathis, S. Dasiopoulou, and A. Gómez Pérez. D1.1.2 Prototypical Business Use Cases. Technical report, Knowledge Web NoE, 2004.
20. N. Noy and M. Musen. PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proceedings of AAAI, pages 450-455, 2000.
21. J. Petrini and T. Risch. Processing queries over RDF views of wrapped relational databases. In Proceedings of the workshop on Wrapper Techniques for Legacy Systems, 2004.
22. N. Preguica, M. Shapiro, and C. Matheson. Semantics-based reconciliation for collaborative and mobile environments. In Proceedings of CoopIS, pages 38-55, 2003.
23. E. Rahm and P. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal, (10(4)):334-350, 2001.
24. P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics, IV, 2005.
25. P. Shvaiko, F. Giunchiglia, P. Pinheiro da Silva, and D. L. McGuinness. Web explanations for semantic heterogeneity discovery. In Proceedings of ESWC, pages 303-317, 2005.
26. P. Shvaiko, A. Léger, F. Paulus, L. Rocuet, L. Nixon, M. Mochol, Y. Kompatsiaris, V. Papastathis, and S. Dasiopoulou. D1.1.3 Knowledge Processing Requirements Analysis. Technical report, Knowledge Web NoE, 2004.
27. P. Traverso and M. Pistore. Automated composition of semantic web services into executable processes. In Proceedings of ISWC, pages 380-394, 2004.
28. Y. Velegrakis, R. J. Miller, and J. Mylopoulos. Representing and querying data transformations. In Proceedings of ICDE, pages 81-92, 2005.
29. L. Yan, R. Miller, L. Haas, and R. Fagin. Data driven understanding and refinement of schema mappings. SIGMOD Record, 30(2):485-496, 2001.
30. J. Zhong, H. Zhu, J. Li, and Y. Yu. Conceptual graph matching for semantic search. In Proceedings of the ICCS, pages 92-106, 2002.