R&D knowledge is power

Research Technology Management

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 41-47

  Henard, David H ^a   McFadyen, M Ann ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Absorptive capacity; Competitive advantage; Knowledge management; Product development; R D

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; ECONOMICS; PERSONNEL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION;

EID: 33646410071     PISSN: 08956308     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08956308.2006.11657377     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Drucker, Peter F. Knowledge-worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge. California Management Review 41 (2), 1999, pp. 79-94.
2. Nonaka, Ikujiro. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5(1), 1994, pp. 14-37;
3. Simon, Herbert A. Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 1991, pp. 125-134.
4. Kogut, Bruce and Zander, Udo. Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology. Organization Science 3 (5), 1992, pp. 383-97;
5. Marsh. Sarah J. and Stock, Gregory N. Building Dynamic Capabilities in New Product Development through Intertemporal Integration. Journal of Product Innovation Management 20, 2003, pp. 136-48;
6. Sherman, J. Daniel, Souder, William E., and Jenssen, Svenn A. Differential Effects of the Primary forms of Cross Functional Integration of Product Development Cycle Time. J. Product Innovation Management 17, 2000, pp. 257-67.
7. Cohen, Wesley M. and Levinthal, Daniel A. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 1990, pp. 128-52;
8. Polanyi, Michael. The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday and Company, Inc.: Garden City, NY, 1966.
9. Utterback, James M. The Proeess of Technological Innovation within the Firm. Academy of Management Journal 12, 1971, pp. 76-88.
10. Leonard-Barton, Dorothy. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal 13 (Special Issue), 1992, pp. 111-25.
11. Hamel, Gary and Prahalad, C. K. Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Review 72 (4), 1994, pp. 122-8.
12. Afuah, Allan. Innovation Management: Strategies, Implementation, and Profits. 2nd ed., Oxford University Press: New York, 2003.
13. Conner, Kathleen R. and Prahalad, C. K. A Resource-based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism. Organization Science 7(1) 1996, pp. 477-501.
14. Henard, David H. and McFadyen, M. Ann. The Complementary Roles of Applied and Basic Research: A Knowledge-based Perspective. J. Product Innovation Management, 22(6), 2005, pp. 503-514;
15. Salter, Ammon J. and Martin, Ben R. The Economic Benefits of Publicly Funded Basic Research: A Critical Review. Research Policy 30, 2001, pp. 257-67.
16. Cockburn, Iain M. and Henderson, Rebecca M. Absorptive Capacity, Coauthoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery. The Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (2), 1998, pp. 157-82.
17. Hargadon, Andrew B. Firms as Knowledge Brokers: Lessons in Pursuing Continuous Innovation. California Management Review 40 (3), 1998, pp. 209-27.
18. National Academy of Sciences. The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial Performance. The National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., 2004.
19. Nonaka, Ikujiro. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review Nov-Dec, 1991, pp. 96-104.
20. Cusumano, Michael A. and Selby, Richard W. How Microsoft Competes. Research-Technology Management Jan-Feb, 1996, pp. 26-30.
21. Munsch, Kenneth, Outsourcing Design and Innovation. Research-Technology Management Jan-Feb, 2004, pp. 27-30.
22. Avers, Alan D. Industrial Research Institute's R&D Trends Forecast for 2005. Research-Technology Management Jan-Feb, 2005, pp. 18-22.
23. Prahalad, C. K. The Role of Core Competencies in the Corporation. Research-Technology Management Nov-Dec, 1993, pp. 40-7.