Testing delays resulting in increased identification accuracy in line-ups and show-ups

Journal of Offender Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 35-49

  Dekle, Dawn J ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646409159     PISSN: 10509674     EISSN: 15408558     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J076v25n03_03     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bothwell, R.K., Deffenbacher, K.A., & Brigham, J.C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4) 691-695.
2. Brown, E., Deffenbacher, K.A., and Sturgill, W. (1977). Memory for faces and the circumstances of encounter. Journal of Applied Psychology 62 311-318.
3. Chance, J.E., Goldstein, A.G., and McBride, L. (1975). Differential experi-ence and recognition memory for faces. Journal of Social Psychology 97 243-253.
4. Clifford, B.R., & R. Bull. (1978). The Psychology of Person Identification. London: Routledge & Regan Paul.
5. Cutler, B.L., and Penrod, S.D. (1989a). Forensically relevant moderators of the relation between eyewitness identification accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 650-652.
6. Cutler, B.L., and Penrod, S.D. (1989b). Moderators of the confidence-accu-racy correlation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base- rates. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 95-107.
7. Deffenbacher, K.A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243-260.
8. Deffenbacher, K.A., Carr, T.H., and Leu, J.R. (1981). Memory for words, pictures, and faces: Retroactive interference, forgetting, and reminiscence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7 299-305.
9. Dekle, D.J., Beal, C.R., Elliott, R., and Huneycutt, D. (1995). Children as witnesses: A comparison of lineup versus showup identification methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 354.1-12.
10. Ebbinghaus (1885). Trans. H.A. Ruger and C.E. Bussenius (1973). Memory. New York Teacher’s College, Columbia University.
11. Egan, D., Pittner, M., and Goldstein, A.G. (1977). Eyewitness identification: Photographs vs. live models. Law and Human Behavior, I, 199-206.
12. Ellis, H.D. (1984), Practical aspects of facial memory. In G.L. Wells & E.F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness Testimony: Psychological Perspectives (pp. 12-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Ellison, K.W., and Buckhout, R. (1981). Psychology and Criminal Justice. New York: Harper & Row.
14. Fleet, M.L., Brigham, J.C., and Bothwell, R.K. (1987). The confidence-accu-racy relationship: The effects of confidence assessment and choosing. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(2), 171-187.
15. Gehring, R.E., Toglia, M.P., and Kimble, G.A. (1976). Recognition memory for words and pictures at short and long retention intervals. Memory and Cognition, 4, 256-260.
16. Goldstein, A.G., and J.E. Chance. (1981). Laboratory studies of face recognition. In G. Davies, H. Ellis, & J. Sherperd (Eds.), Perceiving and Remembering Faces (pp. 81-104). London: Academic Press.
17. Goldstein, A.G., and Chance, J.E. (1971). Visual recognition memory for complex configurations. Perception and Psychophysics, 9, 237-241.
18. Gonzalez, R., Ellsworth, P.C., and Pembroke, M. (1993). Response biases in lineups and showups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 525-537.
19. Kassin, S.M. (1985). Eyewitness Identification: Retrospective self-awareness and the accuracy-confidence correlation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 878-893.
20. Kassin, S.M., Ellsworth, P.C., and Smith, V.L. (1989). The ‘general acceptance’ of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 44, 1089-1098.
21. Laughery, K.R., Fessler, P.K., Lenorovitz, D.R., and Yoblick, D.A. (1974). Time delay and similarity effects in facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 490-496.
22. Leippe, M.R. (1980). Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence. Law and Human Behavior, 4(4), 261-274.
23. Lindsay, R.C.L. (1986). Confidence and accuracy of eyewitness identification from lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 10(3), 229-239.
24. Lindsay, R.C.L., and Wells, G.L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation Journal of Applied Psychology' 70(3), 556-564.
25. Moore, P.J., and Ebbesen, E.B. (1992, June). Showup identification procedure increases accuracy of eyewitnesses to a violent event. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Society Conference, San Diego, CA.
26. Neil v. Biggers, 409 US 188 (1972).
27. Shepherd, J.W. (1983). Identification after long delays. In S.M.A. Lloyd-Bostock & B.R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating Eyewitness Evidence (pp. 173-187). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
28. Shepherd, J.W., Ellis, H.D., and Davies, G.M. (1982). Identification Evidence: A Psychological Evaluation. Aberdeen, Scotland: Aberdeen University Press.
29. Shepard, R.N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
30. State v. Hooper, 703 P.2d 482 (Ariz. 1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1073 (1986).
31. United States v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98, 116-17 (1977).
32. Wells, G.L. (1978). Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546-1557.
33. Wells, G.L., Ferguson, T.J., and Lindsay, R.C.L. (1981). The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology 66 688-696.
34. Wells, G.L., and Lindsay, R.C.L. (1985). Methodological notes on the accuracy-confidence relation in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 413-419.
35. Yarmey, A.D. (1971). Recognition memory for familiar “public” faces: Effects of orientation and delay. Psychonomic Science, 24, 286-288.