Taking guns from batterers: Public support and policy implications

Evaluation Review

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 361-373

  Sorenson, Susan B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Firearms; Intimate partner violence; Norms; Policy; Violence prevention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CRIMINAL LAW; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; FEMALE; FIREARM; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; LEGAL ASPECT; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POLICE; POLICY; PUBLIC OPINION; REVIEW; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL WORK; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CRIMINAL LAW; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; FEMALE; FIREARMS; HUMANS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POLICE; PUBLIC OPINION; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL WORK;

EID: 33646404892     PISSN: 0193841X     EISSN: 15523926     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X06287217     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. California Health Interview Survey, 2002. CHIS 2001 methodology series: Report 4. Response rates. University of California Los Angeles. Center for Health Policy Research. http://www.chis.ucla.edu/chis_methods.html (accessed August 20, 2003).
2. California State Legislature, 2005. http://www.legislature.ca.gov (accessed September 10, 2005).
3. Frattaroli, S., and S. P. Teret. 2006. Understanding and informing policy implementation: A case study of the domestic violence provisions of the Maryland Gun Violence Act. Evaluation Review 30:347-360.
4. Frattaroli, S., and J. S. Vernick. 2006. Separating batterers and guns: A review and analysis of gun removal laws in 50 states. Evaluation Review 30:296-312.
5. Peace Officer Standards and Training. 2004. Municipal police and sheriff department current sworn personnel: Agency ethnic group/gender summary. Internal data run on May 4, 2004.
6. Pedhazur, E. J., and F. N. Kerlinger. 1982. Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
7. Rossi, P. H., and A. B. Anderson. 1982. The factorial survey approach: An introduction. In Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach, edited by P. H. Rossi and S. L. Nock, 15-67. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Seave, P. L. 2006. Disarming batterers through restraining orders: The promise and the reality in California. Evaluation Review 30:245-265.
9. Simon, T. R., M. Anderson, M. P. Thompson, A. E. Crosby, G. Shelley, and J. J. Sacks. 2001. Attitudinal acceptance of intimate partner violence among U. S. adults. Violence & Victims 16:115-26.
10. Sorenson, S. B. 2006. Firearm use in intimate partner violence: A brief overview. Evaluation Review 30:229-236.
11. Tjaden, P., and N. Thoennes. 2000. Extent, nature and consequences of intimate partner violence (NCJ 181867). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
12. Weinbaum, Z., T. L. Stratton, G. Chavez, C. Motylewski-Link, N. Barrera, and J. G. Courtney. 2001. Female victims of intimate partner physical domestic violence (IPP-DV), California 1998. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 21:313-19.