Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Conflict Tactics Scales: Parent-child Version (CTSPC) used to identify child abuse

Cadernos de Saude Publica

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 503-515

  Reichenheim, Michael Eduardo ^a   Moraes, Claudia Leite ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Domestic Violence; Questionnaires; Reliability and Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646402890     PISSN: 0102311X     EISSN: 16784464     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2006000300005     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Kashani JH, Daniel AE, Dandoy AC, Holcomb WR. Family Violence: impact on children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1992; 31:181-9.
2. Heise L, Pitanguy J, Germain A. Violence against women: the hidden health burden. Washington DC: World Bank; 1994. (Discussion Paper, 255).
3. Straus MA, Gelles RJ. Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction Publisher; 1995.
4. Gelles RJ. Intimate violence in families. London: SAGE Publications; 1997.
5. Bardi M, Borognini-Tarli SM. A survey on parent-child conflict resolution: intrafamily violence in Italy. Child Abuse Negl 2001; 6:839-53.
6. Watts C, Zimmerman C. Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. Lancet 2002; 359:1232-7.
7. Assis SG. Trajetória sócio-epidemiológica da violência contra crianças e adolescentes: metas de prevenção e promoção [Tese de Doutorado]. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 1995.
8. Guedes LG. Violência doméstica: prevalência e fatores associados em famílias atendidas num serviço de emergência pediátrica [Dissertação de Mestrado]. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteira, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; 1996.
9. Ferreira AL, Gonçalves HS, Marques MJV, Moraes SRS. A prevenção da violência contra a criança na experiência do Ambulatório de Atendimento à Família: entraves e possibilidades de atuação. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 1999; 4:123-30.
10. Gonçalves HS, Ferreira AL, Marques MJV. Avaliação de serviço de atenção a crianças vítimas de violência doméstica. Rev Saúde Pública 1999; 33:547-53.
11. Ministério da Saúde. Política nacional de redução da morbimortalidade por acidentes e violências. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2001.
12. Moraes CL, Reichenheim ME. Domestic violence during pregnancy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 79:269-77.
13. Moura ATMS, Reichenheim ME. Estamos realmente detectando violência familiar contra a criança em serviços de saúde? A experiência de um serviço público do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2005; 21:1124-33.
14. Schraiber LB, d'Oliveira AF. Violence against women and Brazilian health care policies: a proposal for integrated care in primary care services. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 78 Suppl 1:S21-5.
15. Djeddah C, Facchin P, Ranzato C, Romer C. Child abuse: current problems and key public health challenges. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51:905-15.
16. Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R. The global burden of injuries. Am J Public Health 2000; 90:523-6.
17. Behling O, Law KS. Translating questionnaires and other research instruments: problems and solutions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2000.
18. Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL, Hasselmann MH. Equivalência semântica da versão em português do instrumento Abuse Assessment Screening para rastrear a violência contra a mulher grávida. Rev Saúde Pública 2000; 34:610-6.
19. Moraes CL, Hasselmann MH, Reichenheim ME. Adaptação transcultural para o português do instrumento "Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)" utilizado para identificar violência entre casais. Cad Saúde Pública 2002; 18:163-76.
20. Moraes CL, Reichenheim ME. Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) Portuguese version used to identify violence within couples. Cad Saúde Pública 2002; 18:783-96.
21. Hasselmann MH, Reichenheim ME. Adaptação transcultural da versão em português da Conflict Tactics Scales Form R (CTS-1), usada para aferir violência no casal: equivalências semântica e de mensuração. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19:1083-93.
22. Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Adaptação transcultural do instrumento Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC) utilizado para identificar a violência contra a criança. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19:1701-12.
23. Archer J. Assessment of the reliability of the conflict tactics scales: A meta-analytic review. J Interpers Violence 1999; 14:1263-89.
24. Straus MA. Measuring intra-familiar conflict and violence: the conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam 1979; 41:75-88.
25. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): development and preliminary psychometric data. J Fam Issues 1996; 17:283-316.
26. Straus MA, Hamby SH, Finkelhor D, Moore DW, Runyan D. Identification of child maltreatment with parent-child conflict tactics scales: development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse Negl 1998; 22:249-70.
27. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 1998; 7:323-35.
28. Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
29. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 1968; 70:213-20.
30. Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall; 1993.
31. Shrout PE. Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry. Stat Methods Med Res 1998; 7:301-17.
32. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951; 16:297-334.
33. Nunnally JCJ, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1995.
34. Bleda M-J, Tobias A. Cronbach's alpha one-sided confidence interval (insert sg143). Stata Technical Bulletin 2000; 56:26-7.
35. Woodward JA, Bentler PM. A statistical lower bound to population reliability. Psychol Bull 1978; 85:1323-6.
36. Divgi DR. Calculation of the tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 1979; 44:169-72.
37. Kaiser HF. Varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958; 23:187-200.
38. Skinner CJ, Holt D, Smith TMF. Analysis of complex surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.
39. Korn EL, Graubard BI. Analysis of health surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.
40. Straus MA, Gelles RJ. Physical violence in American families: risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 1995.
41. Tajima EA. The relative importance of wife abuse as a risk factor for violence against children. Child Abuse Negl 2000; 24:1383-98.
42. Muller RT, Goebel-Fabbri AE, Diamond T, Dinklage D. Social support and the relationship between family and community violence exposure and psychopathology among high risk adolescents. Child Abuse Negl 2000; 24:449-64.
43. Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry 1974; 131:1121-3.
44. Smart RG, Arif A, Hughes P, Medina-Mora ME, Navaratnam V, Varma VK, et al. Drugs use among non-student youth. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1981. (WHO Offset Publication, 60).
45. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 1991; 32:705-14.
46. Chor D, Griep RH, Lopes CS, Faerstein E. Medidas de rede e apoio social no Estudo Pró-Saúde: pré-testes e estudo piloto. Cad Saúde Pública 2001; 17:887-96.
47. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
48. van der Linden WJ, Hambleton RK. Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer; 1996.
49. Belsky J. Etiology of maltreatment: a developmental-ecological analysis. Psychol Bull 1993; 114:413-34.
50. Gough D. Defining the problem. Child Abuse Negl 1996; 20:993-1002.