A large scale taxonomy mapping evaluation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3729 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 67-81

  Avesani, Paolo ^a   Giunchiglia, Fausto ^b   Yatskevich, Mikalai ^b  

^a ITC IRST   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; WORLD WIDE WEB;

DATA ORGANIZATIONS; GOOGLE; LARGE SCALE TAXONOMY;

LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646396176     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11574620_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. P. Avesani. Evaluation framework for local ontologies interoperability. In AAAI Workshop on Meaning Negotiation, 2002.
2. R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto. Modern Information Retrieval. Addison Wesley, 1999.
3. S. Bergamaschi, S. Castano, and M. Vincini. Semantic integration of semistructured and structured data sources. SIGMOD Record, (28(1)):54-59, 1999.
4. P. Bouquet, L. Serafini, and S. Zanobini. Semantic coordination: a new approach and an application. In Fensel D., Sycara K. P., and Mylopoulos J., editors, The Semantic Web, volume 2870 of LNCS, Sanibel Island, Fla., 20-23 October 2003.
5. H. Doan, P. Domingos, and A. Halevy. Learning to match the schemas of data sources: A multistrategy approach. Machine Learning, 50:279-301, 2003.
6. M. Ehrig and Y. Sure. Ontology mapping - an integrated approach. In Christoph Bussler, John Davis, Dieter Fensel, and Rudi Studer, editors, Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium, volume 3053 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 76-91, Heraklion, Greece, MAY 2004. Springer Verlag.
7. J. Euzenat and P. Valtchev. An integrative proximity measure for ontology alignment. In Proceedings of Semantic Integration workshop at International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 2003.
8. J. Euzenat and P. Valtchev. Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-lite. In Proceedings of European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pages 333-337, 2004.
9. F. Giunchiglia and P. Shvaiko. Semantic matching. The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal, (18(3)):265-280, 2003.
10. F. Giunchiglia, P. Shvaiko, and M. Yatskevich. S-match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In Bussler C., Davies J., Fensel D., and Studer R., editors, The semantic web: research and applications, volume 3053 of LNCS, Heraklion, 10-12 May 2004.
11. F. Giunchiglia, M. Yatskevich, and E. Giunchiglia. Efficient semantic matching. In Proceedings of the end european semantic web conference (ESWC'05), Heraklion, 29 May-1 June 2005.
12. D. Goren-Bar and T.Kuflik. Supporting user-subjective categorization with self-organizing maps and learning vector quantization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology JASIST, 56(4):345-355, 2005.
13. H.H.Do and E. Rahm. COMA - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In Proceedings of Very Large Data Bases Conference (VLDB), pages 610-621, 2001.
14. R. Ichise, H. Takeda, and S. Honiden. Integrating multiple internet directories by instance-based learning. In IJCAI, pages 22-30, 2003.
15. J. Madhavan, P. A. Bernstein, and E. Rahm. Generic schema matching with cupid. The Very Large Databases (VLDB) Journal, pages 49-58, 2001.
16. B. Magnini, M. Speranza, and C. Girardi. A semantic-based approach to interoperability of classification hierarchies: Evaluation of linguistic techniques. In Proceedings of COLING-2004, August 23-27, 2004.
17. D. L. McGuinness, R. Fikes, J. Rice, and S. Wilder. An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Proceedings of International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR), pages 483-493, 2000.
18. S. Melnik, H. Garcia-Molina, and E. Rahm. Similarity flooding: A versatile graph matching algorithm. In Proceedings of International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), pages 117-128, 2002.
19. Noy N. and Musen M. A. Anchor-prompt: Using non-local context for semantic matching. In Proceedings of workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing at International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 63-70, 2001.
20. E. Rahm and P. Bernstein. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB Journal, (10(4)):334-350, 2001.
21. P. Shvaiko and J. Euzenat. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal on Data Semantics, IV, 2005.
22. Y. Sure, O. Corcho, J. Euzenat, and T. Hughes. Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-based Tools (EON), 2004. http://CEUR-WS.org/Vol-128/.
23. C. Welty and N. Guarino. Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering, (39(1)):51-74, 2001.
24. L. Xu and D.W. Embley. Using domain ontologies to discover direct and indirect matches for schema elements. In Proceedings of Semantic Integration workshop at International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), 2003.