Ovipositional preferences, damage thresholds, and detection of the tomato-potato psyllid cockerelli (Homoptera: Psyllidae) on selected tomato accessions

Bulletin of Entomological Research

Volumn 96, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 197-204

  Liu, D ^a   Trumble, J T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Economic injury level; Plant resistance; Psyllid yellows; Tomato

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; EGG PRODUCTION; OVIPOSITION; PEST CONTROL; PEST DAMAGE; POPULATION DENSITY; TRANSPLANTATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EGG LAYING; FEMALE; HEMIPTERA; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; NYMPH; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; POPULATION DENSITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; TOMATO;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; FEMALE; HEMIPTERA; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; NYMPH; OVIPOSITION; PLANT LEAVES; POPULATION DENSITY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

BAJA CALIFORNIA [(STT) MEXICO]; CALIFORNIA; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ARTHROPODA; BACTERICERA; HEMIPTERA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PARATRIOZA COCKERELLI; PSYLLIDAE; PYRUS COMMUNIS; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 33646393255     PISSN: 00074853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1079/BER2005416     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Al-Jabar, A. (1999) Integrated pest management of tomato/potato psyllid, Paratrioza cockerelli (Sulc) (Homoptera: Psyllidae) with emphasis on its importance in greenhouse grown tomatoes. PhD dissertation, Colorado State University.
2. Berdegué, M., Reitz, S.R. & Trumble, J.T. (1998) Host plant selection and development in Spodoptera exigua: do mother and offspring know best? Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 89, 57-64.
3. Blood, H.L., Richards, B.L. & Wann, F.B. (1933) Studies of psyllid yellows of tomato. Phytopathology 23, 930.
4. Carter, R.D. (1950) Toxicity of Paratrioza cockerelli to certain solanaceous plants. PhD dissertation, University of California.
5. Carter, W. (1939) Injuries to plants caused by insect toxins. Botanical Review 5, 273-326.
6. Chapman, R.K. (1985) Insects that poison plants. American Vegetable Grower 33, 31-38.
7. Cooper, W.R. & Goggin, F.L. (2005) Effects of jasmonate-induced defenses in tomato on the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115, 107-115.
8. De Ilarduya, O.M., Xie, Q.G. & Kaloshian, I. (2003) Aphid-induced defense responses in Mi-1-mediated compatible and incompatible tomato interactions. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 16, 699-708.
9. Eigenbrode, S.D. & Trumble, J.T. (1993) Antibiosis to beet armyworm, Spodoptera exigua, in Lycopersicon accessions. HortScience 28, 932-934.
10. Eigenbrode, S.D., Trumble, J.T. & Jones, R.A. (1993) Resistance to beet armyworm, hemipterans, and Liriomyza spp. in Lycopersicon. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 118, 525-530.
11. Farrar, R.R. & Kennedy, G.G. (1992) Sources of insect and mite resistance in tomato in Lycopersicon spp. pp. 121-142 in Kalloo, G. (Ed.), Monographs on theoretical and applied genetics, vol. 14. Genetic improvement of tomato. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
12. Garzón, T.J.A., Garza, C.A. & Bujanos, M.R. (1986) Determinacion del insecto vector de la enfermedad de tipo viral "permanente del tomate" (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) en la región del Bajío. p. 30 in: XIII Congreso Nacional de Fitopatología. Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas Resúmenes Sociedad Mexicana de Fitopatología, A.C.
13. Garzón, T.J.A., Bujanos, M.R., Avilés, M.C.G., Byerly, M.K.F., Parga, T.V., Martínez, C.J.L. & Marín, J.A. (2004) Bactericera (Paratrioza) cockerelli Sulc, transmisor de toxinas y vectores de fitoplasmas. Memoria del curso "Manejo de plagas en cultivo de tomate, chile y pepino.", Sinaloa, México. pp. 80-94.
14. Hodkinson, I.D. & Hughes, M.K. (1982) Insect herbivory. 77 pp. New York, Chapman and Hall.
15. Kagata, H. & Ohgushi, T. (2001) Preference and performance linkage of a leaf-mining moth on different Salicaceae species. Population Ecology 43, 141-147.
16. Knowlton, G.F. & James, M.J. (1931) Studies on the biology of Paratrioza cockerelli (Sulc). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 24, 283-291.
17. Liu, D. & Trumble, J.T. (2004) Tomato psyllid behavioral responses to tomato plant lines and interactions of plant lines with insecticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 1078-1085.
18. Liu, D. & Trumble, J.T. (2005) Interactions of plant resistance and insecticides on the development and survival of Bactericera cockerelli [Sulc] (Homoptera: Psyllidae). Crop Protection 24, 111-117.
19. Liu, D., Trumble, J.T. & Stouthamer, R. (2006) Molecular characterization indicates recent introductions of potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) into western North America are genetically different from eastern populations. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, in press.
20. Luft, P.A. & Paine, T.D. (1997) Behavioral cues associated with oviposition by Trioza eugeniae. Entomologia Experimental et Applicata 84, 293-299.
21. Luft, P.A., Paine, T.D. & Redak, R.A. (2001) Limiting the potential for intraspecific competition: regulation of Trioza eugeniae oviposition on unexpanded leaf tissue. Ecological Entomology 26, 395-103.
22. Matkin, O.A. & Chandler, P.A. (1957) The U. C.-type soil mixes. pp. 68-85 in Baker, K. (Ed.) The U. C. system for producing healthy container-grown plants through the use of clean soil, clean stock and sanitation. California Agricultural Experiment Station Manual 23, Berkley, California.
23. Mayer, R.T., Mccollum, T.G., Mcdonald, R.E., Polston, J.E. & Doostdar, H. (1996) Bemisia feeding induces pathogenesis-related proteins in tomato. pp. 179-188 in Gerling, D. & Mayer, R.T. (Eds) Bemisia 1995: taxonomy, biology, damage control and management. Andover, Hants, Intercept Ltd.
24. Mayer, R.T., Inbar, M., McKenzie, C.L., Shatters, R., Borowicz, V., Albrecht, U., Powell, C.A. & Doostdar, H. (2002) Multitrophic interactions of the silverleaf whitefly, host plants, competing herbivores, and phytopathogens. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 51, 151-169.
25. McAuslane, H.J., Chen, J., Carle, R.B. & Schmalstig, J. (2004) Influence of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) infestation and squash silverleaf disorder on zucchini seedling growth. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 1096-1105.
26. Miles, P.W. (1999) Aphid saliva. Biological Reviews 74, 41-85.
27. Moran, P.J. & Thompson, G.A. (2001) Molecular responses to aphid feeding in Arabidopsis in relation to plant defense pathways. Plant Physiology 125, 1074-1085.
28. Pletsch, D.J. (1947) The potato psyllid Paratrioza cockerelli (Sulc), its biology and control. Montana Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 446, 95 pp.
29. SAS (2002) SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
30. StatView (1998) SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.
31. Stout, M.J., Workman, K.V., Bostock, R.M. & Duffey, S.S. (1998) Specifcity of induced resistance in the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Oecologia 113, 74-81.
32. Tavormina, S.J. (1982) Sympatric genetic divergence in the leaf-mining insect Liriomyza brassicae (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Evolution 36, 523-524.
33. Trumble, J.T. (1993) Sampling arthropod pests in vegetables, pp. 609-632 in Pedigo, L. & Buntin, D. (Eds) Handbook of sampling methods for arthropod pests in agriculture. Boca Raton, Florida, CRC Press.
34. Underwood, N.C. (1998) The timing of induced resistance and induced susceptibility in the soybean-Mexican bean beetle system. Oecologia 114, 376-381.
35. van der Westhuizen, A.J., Qian, X.M. & Botha, A.M. (1998) Differential induction of apoplastic peroxidase and chitinase activities in susceptible and resistant wheat cultivars by Russian wheat aphid infestation. Plant Cell Reports 18, 132-137.
36. Via, S. (1984a) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. I. Genotype-environment interaction in larval performance on different host plant species. Evolution 38, 881-895.
37. Via, S. (1984b) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. II. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and among host plants. Evolution 38, 896-905.