A partnership model for family service agencies and universities to improve service utilization

Journal of Family Social Work

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 23-38

  Cornille, Thomas A ^a   Mullis, Ann K ^a   Mullis, Ronald L ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency collaboration; Engagement; Family counseling; Family therapy; Partnerships

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646383990     PISSN: 10522158     EISSN: 15404072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J039v07n03_02     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Alexander, J., Barton, C., Gordon, D., Grotpeter, J., Hansson, K., Harrison, R., Mears, S., Mihalic, S., Parsons, B., Pugh, C., Schulman, S., Waldron, H., and Sexton, T., 1998. Blueprints for violence prevention, book three:Functional family therapy. Boulder, CO:Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
2. Alexander, J. F., Holtzworth-Munroe, A., and Jameson, P., 1994. “The process and outcome of marital and family therapy:Research review and evaluation.”. In Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 4th ed. Edited by:Bergin, A. E., and Garfield, S. L., 595–630. New York:John Wiley and Sons.
3. Cornille, T., Boroto, D., Barnes, M., and Hall, P., 1996. Dealing with family distress in schools. Families in Society, 77(7):435–445.
4. Cornille, T. A., Mullis, A. K., and Mullis, R. L., 2000. Jessie Ball duPont Fund family partnership project:A final report. Tallahassee, FL:Florida State University Family Institute.
5. Dumka, L. E., Roosa, M. W., Michaels, M. I., and Suh, K. W., 1995. Using research and theory to develop prevention programs for high risk families. Family Relations, 44:78–86.
6. Elliott, D. S., Blueprints for violence prevention. Boulder, CO:Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado at Boulder. (undated).
7. Henggeler, S. W., Mihalic, S. F., Rone, L., Thomas, C., and Timmons-Mitchell, J., 1998. Blueprints for violence prevention, book six:Multisystemic therapy. Boulder, CO:Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.
8. Hervis, O., Szapocznik, J., and Santisteban, D., Structural systems engagement manual. Miami, FL:Center for Family Studies, University of Miami. (undated).
9. Howard, K. I., Cornille, T., Lyons, J., Vessey, J., Lueger, R., and Saunders, S., 1996. Patterns of service utilization. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53:696–703.
10. Jessie ball duPont Religious, Charitable and Educational Fund. 2001. Retrieved April 4, from the World Wide Web at:http://www.dupontfund.com/.
11. Landau, J., Stanton, M. D., Brinkman-Sull, D., Ikle, D., McCormick, D., Garrett, J., Baciewicz, G., Shea, R., and Wamboldt, F., 1999. Outcomes with the ARISE approach to engaging reluctant drug- and alcohol-dependent individuals in treatment. Submitted for publication.
12. Miklowitz, D. J., and Hooley, J. M., 1998. Developing family psycho educational treatments for patients with bipolar and other severe psychiatric disorders:A pathway from basic research to clinical trials. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24:419–436.
13. Minuchin, S., 1974. Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
14. Shadish, W., Ragsdale, K., Glaser, R. R., and Montgomery, L. M., 1995. The efficacy and effectiveness of marital and family therapy:A perspective from meta-analysis. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21:345–360.
15. Small, S. A., 1995. Action-oriented research:Models and methods. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57:941–955.
16. Strengthening America's families program. 2001. Retrieved April 4, from the World Wide Web at:http://www.strengtheningfamilies.org.
17. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2001. Community action grants for service systems change. Retrieved September 18, 2001 from the World Wide Web at:http://www.samhsa.gov/grants/grants.html.
18. Szapocznik, J., Perez-Vidal, A., Brickman, A. L., Foote, F. F., Santisteban, D., Hervis, O., and Kurtines, W. M., 1988. Engaging adolescent drug abusers and their families in treatment:A strategic structural systems approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(4):552–557.
19. University of Maryland. 2001. Establishing benchmarks for the engaged campus:TheUniversity of Maryland report-January, 2001 Retrieved August 30, 2001, from the World Wide Web at:http://www.inform.umd.edu/campusinfo/depart-ments/commute/services/csp/engagedcampus.html.
20. Williams, J. H., Pierce, W. R., Young, N. S., and Van Dorn, R. A., 2001. Service utilization in high-crime communities:Consumer views on supports and barriers. Families in Society, 82:409–418.
21. W.K. Kellogg Foundation. 2001. Promoting engagement of communities and institutions Retrieved August 30, 2001, from the World Wide Web at:http://www.wkkf.org/documents/youthed/engaged.asp.