Environmental impact monitoring in the EIA process of South Australia

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 426-447

  Ahammed, A K M Rafique ^a   Nixon, Bronte Merrick ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b Parsons Brinckerhoff Australia   (Australia)

Author keywords

Auditing; Environmental impact assessment (EIA); Environmental impact monitoring (EIM); Follow up; Practice; South Australia

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; HUMANITIES COMPUTING; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PERSONNEL;

AUDITING; FOLLOW-UP; PRACTICE; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

CORRELATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; LEGISLATION;

AUSTRALASIA; AUSTRALIA; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

EID: 33646374635     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Arts J. EIA follow-up on the role of ex post evaluation in environmental impact assessment (1998), Geo Press, Groningen, the Netherlands
2. Arts E.J.M.M., and Nooteboom S. Environmental impact assessment monitoring and auditing. In: Petts J. (Ed). Handbook of environmental impact assessment vol. 1 (1999), Blackwell, Oxford 229-251
3. Arts J., Caldwell P., and Morrison-Saunders A. Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions-findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 conference. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 19 4 (2001) 175-185
4. Bailey J.M. Environmental impact assessment and management: an underexplored relationship. Environ Manage 21 3 (1997) 317-327
5. Bailey J.M., and Hobbs V. A proposed framework and database for EIA auditing. J Environ Manag 31 (1990) 163-172
6. Bailey J., Hobbs V., and Saunders A. Environmental auditing: artificial waterway developments in Western Australia. J Environ Manag 34 (1992) 1-13
7. Barker A., and Wood C.M. An evaluation of EIA system performance in eight EU countries. Environ Impact Assess Rev 19 (1999) 387-404
8. Beanlands G. Research demands of marine environmental impact assessments. Mar Pollut Bull 25 1-4 (1992) 104-106
9. Beanlands G.E., and Duinker P.N. An ecological framework for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Manage 18 (1984) 267-277
10. Berkes F. The intrinsic difficulty of predicting impacts: lessons from the James Bay hydro project. Environ Impact Assess Rev 8 (1988) 201-220
11. Bird A., and Therivel R. Post-auditing of environmental impact statements using data held in public registers of environmental information. Proj Appraisal 11 2 (1996) 105-116
12. Bisset R. Problems and issues in the implementation of EIA audits. Environ Impact Assess Rev 1 (1981) 379-396
13. Bisset R. Post-development audits to investigate the accuracy of environmental impact predictions. Z Umweitpolit 4 (1984) 463-484
14. Bisset R. Methods for environmental impact assessment: a selective survey with case studies. In: Biswas A.K., and Geping Q. (Eds). Environmental impact assessment for developing countries (1987), Tycooly International, London 3-64
15. Bisset R., and Tomlinson P. Environmental impact assessment, monitoring and post development audit. In: PADC Environmental Impact Assessment and Planning Unit (Ed). Environmental impact assessment, NATO ASI Series (1983), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Hague 405-424
16. Bisset R., and Tomlinson P. Monitoring and auditing of impacts. In: Wathern P. (Ed). Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice (1988), Routledge, London 117-128
17. Body P, 1998. Approaches to Ongoing Environmental Management of Major Projects or Developments. Unpublished paper, Environmental Impact Assessment Branch, Planning SA, Adelaide.
18. Briffett C. Environmental impact assessment in East Asia. In: Petts J. (Ed). Handbook of environmental impact assessment vol. 2 (1999), Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK 143-167
19. Buckley R. Precision in environmental impact prediction: first national environmental audit, Australia (1989), Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra
20. Buckley R. What's wrong with EIA?. Search 20 5 (1989) 146-147
21. Buckley R. Auditing the precision and accuracy of environmental impact predictions in Australia. Environ Monit Assess 18 (1991) 1-23
22. Buckley R. How accurate are environmental impact predictions. Ambio 20 3-4 (1991) 161-162
23. Buckley R. Response to comment by J.M. Alho: environmental impact predictions in science and planning. Ambio 21 4 (1992) 323-324
24. Buckley R. Environmental auditing. In: Vanclay F., and Bronstein D.A. (Eds). Environmental and social impact assessment (1995), John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
25. Canter L. The role of environmental management in responsible project management. Environ Prof 15 (1993) 76-87
26. Carpenter R. The case for continuous monitoring and adaptive management under NEPA. In: Clark R., and Canter L. (Eds). Environmental policy and NEPA-past, present and future (1997), St. Lucie Press, Boca Raton 163-180
27. Chapman C, 1998. Personal Communication, EIA Branch. Planning SA, Adelaide.
28. Commonwealth Environment Protection Agency. An analysis of EIA practices and procedures in Australian states and territories. Review of commonwealth environmental impact assessment (1994), Commonwealth Environment Protection Agency, Canberra
29. Conacher A., and Conacher J. Environmental planning and management in Australia (2000), Oxford University Press, Victoria, Australia
30. Cooney M, 1998. Personal communication. Marine Facilities Section of Transport SA, Adelaide.
31. Culhane P.J., Friesema H.P., and Beecher J.A. Forecasts and environmental decision making: the content and predictive accuracy of environmental impact statements (1987), Westview Press, Boulder, USA
32. Dipper B., Jones C., and Wood C. Monitoring and post-auditing in environmental impact assessment: a review. J Environ Plan Manag 41 6 (1998) 731-747
33. Fairweather P. Where is the science in EIA?. Search 20 5 (1989) 141-144
34. Gibson R.B. Environmental assessment design: lessons from the Canadian experience. Environ Prof 15 (1993) 12-24
35. Glasson J. Environmental impact assessment: the next steps?. Built Environ 20 4 (1995) 277-279
36. Glasson J. Life after the decision: the importance of monitoring in EIA. Built Environ 20 4 (1995) 309-320
37. Glasson J., Therivel R., and Chadwick A. Introduction to environmental impact assessment (1994), UCL Press, London
38. Glasson J., Therivel R., and Chadwick A. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. second ed (1999), UCL Press, London
39. Harvey N. Environmental impact statements for major projects in South Australia 1982 to1994 (1995), Royal Geographic Society of Australasia (SA Branch) Inc
40. Harvey N. Environmental impact assessment: procedures, practice and prospects in Australia (1998), Oxford University Press, Melbourne
41. In: Holling C.S. (Ed). Adaptive environmental assessment and management (1978), John Wiley & Sons, New York
42. Intergovernmental Agreement on the Environment (1992), AGS, Canberra
43. In: Lee N., and George C. (Eds). Environmental assessment in developing and transitional countries (2000), John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester
44. Lohani B.N., Evans J.W., Everitt R.R., Ludwig H., Carpenter R.A., and Tu S.-L. Environmental impact assessment for developing countries in Asia vol. 1 (1997), Asian Development Bank, Manilla
45. Malone N. Environmental impact monitoring. Environ Plann Law J 14 3 (1997) 222-238
46. McCallum D.R. Follow-up to environmental impact assessment: learning from Canadian government experience. Environ Monit Assess 8 (1987) 199-215
47. McKillop J., and Brown A.L. Linking project appraisal and development: the performance of EIA in large-scale mining projects. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 1 4 (1999) 407-428
48. Morgan R.K. Environmental impact assessment: a methodological perspective (1998), Chapman and Hall, London
49. In: Morris P., and Therivel R. (Eds). Methods of environmental impact assessment (1995), UCL Press, London
50. Morrison-Saunders A. Environmental impact assessment as a tool for ongoing environmental management. Proj Appraisal 11 (1996) 95-104
51. Morrison-Saunders A., and Arts J. Introduction to EIA follow-up. In: Morrison-Saunders A., and Arts J. (Eds). Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up (2004), Earthscan, London 1-17
52. Morrison-Saunders A., and Bailey J. Exploring the EIA/environmental management relationship. Environ Manage 24 3 (1999) 281-295
53. Morrison-Saunders A., Arts J., Barker J., and Caldwell P. Roles and stakes in environmental impact assessment follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 19 4 (2001) 289-296
54. Munro D.A. Learning from experience: auditing environmental impact assessments. In: Sadler B. (Ed). Audit and evaluation in environmental assessment and management: Canadian and international experience, proceedings of the conference on follow-up/audit of EIA results (1987) Victoria, BC, Environment Canada/The Banff Centre, School of Management
55. Nitz T., and Holland I. Does environmental impact assessment facilitate environmental management activities?. J Environ Assess Policy Manag 2 1 (2000) 1-17
56. Ortolano L., and Shephered A. Environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assess 13 (1995) 3-30
57. Petts J., and Eduljee G. Integration of monitoring, auditing and environmental assessment: waste facility issues. Proj Appraisal 9 4 (1993) 231-241
58. Pfenning P, 1998. Personal communication, Environment Protection Authority, Adelaide, South Australia.
59. Read J.L. A retrospective view of the quality of the fauna component of the Olympic Dam Project Environmental Impact Statement. J Environ Manag 41 (1994) 167-185
60. Sadler B. The evaluation of assessment: post-EIS research and process development. In: Wathern P. (Ed). Environmental impact assessment (1988), Theory and Practice, Routledge 129-142
61. Sadler B. Environmental assessment in a changing world: evaluating practice to improve performance. Final report of the international study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment (1996), Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency/IAIA, Ministry of Supply and Services, Canada
62. Sadler B. Ex-post evaluation of the effectiveness of environmental assessment. In: Porter A.L., and Fittipaldi J.J. (Eds). Environmental methods review: retooling impact assessment for the new century (1998), Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, GA 30-49
63. Shehperd A. Post-project impact assessment and monitoring. In: Porter A.L., and Fittipaldi J.J. (Eds). Environmental methods review: retooling impact assessment for the new century (1998), Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, GA 164-170
64. Shultz G, 1998. Personal communication. SA Water, Berri Regional Office, South Australia.
65. Smith P, 1998. Personal communication. Development Assessment Commission, South Australia.
66. Thomas I. Environmental impact assessment in Australia: theory and practice (1996), The Federation Press, Sydney
67. Thomas I. Environmental impact assessment in Australia: theory and practice. third ed (2001), The Federation Press, Sydney
68. Thomson S., Treweek J.R., and Thurling D.J. The ecological component of environmental impact assessment: a critical review of British environmental statements. J Environ Plann Manag 40 2 (1997) 157-171
69. Tomlinson P., and Atkinson S.F. Environmental audits: a literature review. Environ Monit Assess 8 (1987) 187-198
70. Tomlinson P., and Atkinson S.F. Environmental audits: proposed terminology. Environ Monit Assess 8 (1987) 239-361
71. Wilson E. A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits. Environ Impact Assess Rev 18 1 (1998) 59-71
72. Wood C.M. Environmental impact assessment in Victoria: Australian discretion rules EA. J Environ Manag 14 (1993) 37-59
73. Wood C.M. Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review (1995), Longman, Harlow
74. Wood C.M. Environmental impact assessment: a comparative review. second ed (2003), Pearson Education Limited, England
75. Wood C.M., and Bailey J. Predominance and independence in environmental impact assessment: the western Australia model. Environ Impact Assess Rev 14 (1994) 37-59
76. Wood CM, Bailey J. 1996. Paradise endangered: environmental impact assessment in Western Australia. Report Number 96/2, Institute of Environmental Science, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia.
77. Wood C.M., Dipper B., and Jones C. Auditing the assessments of the environmental impacts of planning projects. J Environ Plann Manag 43 1 (2000) 23-47
78. Wood G. Assessing techniques of assessment: post-development auditing of noise predictive schemes in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal 17 (1999) 217-226
79. Wood G. Post-development auditing of EIA predictive techniques: a spatial analytical approach. J Environ Plann Manag 42 5 (1999) 671-689
80. Wood G. Is what you see what you get? Post-development auditing of methods used for predicting the zone of visual influence in EIA. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20 (2000) 537-556
81. Wright C.J., and Smith P.S. Environmental impact assessment effectiveness in the global environment: Australian implications. National conference on environmental engineering, Gold Coast, Queensland 17-19 June 1992 (1992), Institute of Engineers, Australia