Dry matter yield differences of five common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) biotypes grown at a common site

Weed Science

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 186-190

  Lee, James M ^a   Owen, Micheal D K ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthesis; Biotype; Environmental adaptation; Photoperiod

Indexed keywords

BIOTYPE; PHOTOPERIOD; PLANT; SOIL SURFACE;

IOWA; MINNESOTA; NORTH AMERICA; OHIO; UNITED STATES;

XANTHIUM; XANTHIUM STRUMARIUM;

EID: 33646362270     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0186:DMYDOF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600-603.
2. Blais, P. A. and M. J. Lechowicz. 1989. Variation among populations of Xanthium strumarium (Compositae) from natural and ruderal habitats. Am. J. Bot. 76:901-908.
3. Buchanan, G. A. and E. R. Burns. 1971. Influence of weed competition on cotton, sicldepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576-579.
4. Byrd, J. D. and H. D. Coble. 1991. Interference of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 5:270-278.
5. Jordan, N. R. and J. L. Jannink. 1997. Assessing the practical importance of weed evolution: a research agenda. Weed Res. 37:237-246.
6. Klingman, T. E. and L. R. Oliver. 1994. Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 42:523-527.
7. Lechowicz, M. J. 1984. The effects of individual variation in physiological and morphological traits on the reproductive capacity of the common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. Evolution 38:833-844.
8. Löve, D. and P. Dansereau. 1959. Biosystematic studies on Xanthium taxonomic appraisal and ecological status. Can. J. Bot. 37:173-207.
9. Marwat, K. B. and E. D. Nafziger. 1990. Cocklebur and velvetleaf interference with soybean grown at different densities and planting patterns. Agron. J. 82:531-534.
10. McMillan, C. 1974. Experimental hybridization in Xanthium strumarium of American complexes with diverse photoperiodic adaptation. Can. J. Bot. 52:849-859.
11. McMillan, C. 1975. The Xanthium strumarium complexes in Australia. Aust. J. Bot. 23:173-192.
12. Mitchell-Olds, T. 1995. The molecular basis of quantitative genetic variation in natural populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:324-327.
13. Moran, G. F. and D. R. Marshall. 1978. Allozyme uniformity within and variation between races of the colonizing species Xanthium strumarium L. (noogoora burr). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 31:283-291.
14. Nelson, J. E. and R. S. Fawcett. 1981. Cocklebur. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Extension Bulletin PM-749.
15. Royal, S. S., B. J. Brecke, and D. L. Colvin. 1997. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) interference with peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 45:38-43.
16. Salisbury, F. B. and C. W. Ross. 1978. Plant Physiology. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth pp. 336-342.
17. Snipes, C. E., G. A. Buchanan, J. E. Street, and J. A. Mcguire. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 30:553-556.
18. Tranel, P. J. and J. J. Wassom. 2001. Genetic relationships of common cocklebur accessions from the United States. Weed Sci. 49:318-325.
19. Wallace, D. H., J. P. Baudoin, J. Beaver, et al. 1993a. Improving efficiency of breeding for higher crop yield. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:27-40.
20. Wallace, D. H., K. S. Yourstone, P. N. Masaya, and R. W. Zobel. 1993b. Photoperiod gene control over partitioning between reproductive and vegetative growth. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:6-16.
21. Wallace, D. H., R. W. Zobel, and K. S. Yourstone. 1993c. A whole-system reconsideration of paradigms about photoperiod and temperature control of crop yield. Theor. Appl. Genet. 86:17-26.
22. Weaver, S. E. and M. J. Lechowicz. 1982. The biology of Canadian weeds. 56. Xanthium strumarium L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:211-225.