Valuation of patent - A real options perspective

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 313-318

  Wu, Ming Cheng ^a   Tseng, Chun Yao ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHANGHUA UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b TUNGHAI UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; VALUATION;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; TAIWAN;

EID: 33646361090     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: 14664291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504850500393477     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) The pricing of options and corporate liabilities Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp. 637-59.
2. Bloom, N. and Reenen, J. V. (2002) Patents, real options and firm performance The Economic Journal, 112, pp. 97-116.
3. Brach, M. A. and Paxson, D. A. (2001) A gene to drug venture: Poisson options analysis R&D Management, 31, pp. 203-14.
4. Deng, Z., and Lev, B. and Narin, F. (1999) Science and technology as predictors of stock performance Financial Analysts Journal, 55, pp. 20-32.
5. Ernst, H. (2001) Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: Evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level Research Policy, 30, pp. 143-57.
6. Greene, W. H. (2003) Econometric Analysis, 5th. Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.
7. Grupp, H. and Schmooh, U. (1999) Patent statistics in the age of globalization: New legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation Research Policy, 28, pp. 377-96.
8. Hall, B. H., and Jaffe, A. and Trajtenberg, M. (2000) Market value and patent citations: A first look, University of California at Berekeley. Berkeley CA 2000. In Department of Economics Working Paper No. 00-277.
9. Howell, S. D. and Jagle, A. J. (1997) Laboratory evidence on how managers intuitively value real growth options Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24, pp. 915-35.
10. Laxman, P. R. and Aggarwal, S. (2003) Patent valuation using real options IIMB Management Review, 15, pp. 44-51.
11. Leahy, J. and Whited, T. (1998) The effects of uncertainty on investment: Some stylized facts Journal of Money Credit and Banking, 28, pp. 64-83.
12. Myers, S. C. (1987) Finance theory and financial strategy Midland Corporate Finance Journal, 5, pp. 6-13.
13. Nichols, N. A. (1994) Scientific management at Merck: An interview with CFO Judy Lewent Harvard Business Review, 72, pp. 89-99.
14. Pindyck, R. S. and Rubinfeld, D. L. (1998) Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts, 4th. New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Schankerman, M. and Pake, A. (1986) Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during the post-1950 period The Economic Journal, 96, pp. 1052-76.
16. Schoenecker, T. and Swanson, L. (2002) Indicators of firm technological capability validity and performance implications IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49, pp. 36-44.
17. Schwartz, E. S. (2004) Patents and R&D as real options Economic Notes, 33, pp. 23-54.
18. Sherry, E. F. and Teece, D. J. (2004) Royalties, evolving patent rights, and the value of innovation Research Policy, 33, pp. 179-91.
19. Thomas, P. and McMillan, G. S. (2001) Using science and technology indicators to manage R&D as a business Engineering Management Journal, 13, pp. 9-14.
20. Trigeorgis, L. (1993) Real options and interactions with financial flexibility Financial Management, 22, pp. 202-24.
21. Watanabe, C., and Tsuji, Y. S. and Griffy-Brown, C. (2001) Patent statistics: Deciphering a real versus a pseudo proxy of innovation Technovation, 21, pp. 783-90.