Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 504-514

  Arjmand, N ^a   Shirazi Adl, A ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

EMG; Finite element; Internal loads; Kinematics based approach; Muscle force; Optimization; Stability

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; KINEMATICS; MUSCLE; OPTIMIZATION; STABILITY;

EMG; FINITE ELEMENT; INTERNAL LOADS; KINEMATICS-BASED APPROACH; MUSCLE FORCE;

BIOMECHANICS;

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPRESSION; ELECTROMYOGRAM; FORCE; HAND; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; MUSCLE FATIGUE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE; STRESS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BIOPHYSICS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; KINETICS; LIFTING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MUSCLES; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33646358208     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Nachemson A. Disc pressure measurements. Spine 6 (1981) 93-97
2. Wilke H.J., Neef P., Caimi M., Hoogland T., and Claes L.E. New in vivo measurements of pressures in the intervertebral disc in daily life. Spine 24 (1999) 755-763
3. Rohlmann A., Arntz U., Graichen F., and Bergmann G. Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during sitting. J Biomech 34 (2001) 989-993
4. Rohlmann A., Graichen F., and Bergmann G. Loads on an internal spinal fixation device during physical therapy. Phys Therapy 82 (2002) 44-52
5. McGill S.M., van Wijk M.J., Axler C.T., and Gletsu M. Studies of spinal shrinkage to evaluate low-back loading in the workplace. Ergonomics 39 (1996) 92-102
6. van Dieen J.H., and Toussaint H.M. Spinal shrinkage as a parameter of functional load. Spine 18 (1993) 1504-1514
7. Mouton L.J., Hof A.L., Jongh H.J.D., and Eisma W.H. Influence of posture on the relation between surface electromyogram amplitude and back muscle moment: consequences for the use of surface electromyogram to measure back load. Clin Biomech 6 (1991) 245-251
8. Potvin J.R., Norman R.W., and McGill S.M. Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinal muscle loading during repetitive lifting. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 74 (1996) 119-132
9. van Dieen J.H., Hoozemans M.J., and Toussaint H.M. Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique. Clin Biomech 14 (1999) 685-696
10. Reeves N.P., and Cholewicki J. Modeling the human lumbar spine for assessing spinal loads, stability, and risk of injury. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 31 (2003) 73-139
11. Callaghan J.P., and McGill S.M. Muscle activity and low back loads under external shear and compressive loading. Spine 20 (1995) 992-998
12. Dolan P., and Adams M.A. The relationship between EMG activity and extensor moment generation in the erector spinal muscles during bending and lifting activities. J Biomech 26 4-5 (1993) 513-522
13. Gagnon D., Larivière C., and Loisel P. Comparative ability of EMG, optimization, and hybrid modelling approaches to predict trunk muscle forces and lumbar spine loading during dynamic sagittal plane lifting. Clin Biomech 16 (2001) 359-372
14. Hughes R.E., Chaffin D.B., Lavender S.A., and Andersson G.B. Evaluation of muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography. J Orthop Res 12 (1994) 689-698
15. Schultz A., Haderspeck K., Warwick D., and Portillo D. Use of lumbar trunk muscles in isometric performance of mechanically complex standing tasks. J Orthop Res 1 (1983) 77-91
16. Cholewicki J., and McGill S.M. Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech 11 (1996) 1-15
17. Stokes I.A., and Gardner-Morse M. Lumbar spine maximum efforts and muscle recruitment patterns predicted by a model with multijoint muscles and joints with stiffness. J Biomech 28 (1995) 173-186
18. Stokes I.A., and Gardner-Morse M. Lumbar spinal muscle activation synergies predicted by multi-criteria cost function. J Biomech 34 (2001) 733-740
19. Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A. Model and in vivo studies on human trunk load partitioning and stability in isometric forward flexions. J Biomech, in press.
20. Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A. Biomechanics of changes in lumbar posture in static lifting. Spine, in press.
21. El-Rich M., Shirazi-Adl A., and Arjmand N. Muscle activity, internal loads and stability of the human spine in standing postures: combined model-in vivo studies. Spine 29 (2004) 2633-2642
22. Shirazi-Adl A., Sadouk S., Parnianpour M., Pop D., and El-Rich M. Muscle force evaluation and the role of posture in human lumbar spine under compression. Eur Spine J 11 (2002) 519-526
23. Shirazi-Adl A., El-Rich M., Pop D.G., and Parnianpour M. Spinal muscle forces, internal loads and stability in standing under various postures and loads: applications of kinematics-based algorithm. Eur Spine J 14 (2005) 381-392
24. Bean J.C., Chaffin D.B., and Schultz A.B. Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method. J Biomech 21 (1988) 59-66
25. Crowninshield R.D., and Brand R.A. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech 14 (1981) 793-801
26. Dul J., Johnson G.E., Shiavi R., and Townsend M.A. Muscular synergism-II. A minimum-fatigue criterion for load sharing between synergistic muscles. J Biomech 17 (1984) 675-684
27. Seireg A., and Arvikar R.J. A mathematical model for evaluation of forces in lower extremeties of the musculo-skeletal system. J Biomech 6 (1973) 313-326
28. Wynarsky G.T., and Schultz A.B. Optimization of skeletal configuration: studies of scoliosis correction biomechanics. J Biomech 24 (1991) 721-732
29. Buchanan T.S., and Shreeve D.A. An evaluation of optimization techniques for the prediction of muscle activation patterns during isometric tasks. J Biomech Eng 118 (1996) 565-574
30. Herzog W., and Leonard T.R. Validation of optimization models that estimate the forces exerted by synergistic muscles. J Biomech 24 Suppl. 1 (1991) 31-39
31. Hughes R.E. Choice of optimization models for predicting spinal forces in a three-dimensional analysis of heavy work. Ergonomics 38 (1995) 2476-2484
32. Hughes R.E. Effect of optimization criterion on spinal force estimates during asymmetric lifting. J Biomech 33 (2000) 225-229
33. Parnianpour M., Wang J.L., Shirazi-Adl A., Sparto P., and Wilke H.J. The effect of variations in trunk models in predicting muscle strength and spinal loads. J Musculoskeletal Res l (1997) 55-69
34. Bogduk N., Macintosh J.E., and Pearcy M.J. A universal model of the lumbar back muscles in the upright position. Spine 17 (1992) 897-913
35. Daggfeldt K., and Thorstensson A. The mechanics of back-extensor torque production about the lumbar spine. J Biomech 36 (2003) 815-825
36. Stokes I.A., and Gardner-Morse M. Quantitative anatomy of the lumbar musculature. J Biomech 32 (1999) 311-316
37. Dvorak J., Panjabi M.M., Chang D.G., Theiler R., and Grob D. Functional radiographic diagnosis of the lumbar spine. Flexion-extension and lateral bending. Spine 16 (1991) 562-571
38. Pearcy M., Portek I., and Shepherd J. Three-dimensional X-ray analysis of normal movement in the lumbar spine. Spine 9 (1984) 294-297
39. Plamondon A., Gagnon M., and Maurais G. Application of a stereoradiographic method for the study of intervertebral motion. Spine 13 (1988) 1027-1032
40. Potvin J.R., McGill S.M., and Norman R.W. Trunk muscle and lumbar ligament contributions to dynamic lifts with varying degrees of trunk flexion. Spine 16 (1991) 1099-1107
41. Shirazi-Adl A., and Parnianpour M. Effect of changes in lordosis on mechanics of the lumbar spine-lumbar curvature in lifting. J Spinal Disord 12 (1999) 436-447
42. Yamamoto I., Panjabi M., Crisco T., and Oxland T. Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 14 (1989) 1256-1260
43. Johnson M.A., Polgar J., Weightman D., and Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study. J Neurol Sci 18 (1973) 111-129
44. Davis J., Kaufman K.R., and Lieber R.L. Correlation between active and passive isometric force and intramuscular pressure in the isolated rabbit tibialis anterior muscle. J Biomech 36 (2003) 505-512
45. Raikova R.T., and Prilutsky B.I. Sensitivity of predicted muscle forces to parameters of the optimization-based human leg model revealed by analytical and numerical analyses. J Biomech 34 (2001) 1243-1255
46. Bergmark A. Stability of the lumbar spine-a study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 230 (1989) 1-54
47. Crisco III J.J., and Panjabi M.M. The intersegmental and multisegmental muscles of the lumbar spine-a biomechanical model comparing lateral stabilizing potential. Spine 16 (1991) 793-799
48. Nussbaum M.A., and Chaffin D.B. Development and evaluation of a scalable and deformable geometric model of the human torso. Clin Biomech 11 (1996) 25-34
49. Nussbaum M.A., Chaffin D.B., and Rechtien C.J. Muscle lines-of-action affect predicted forces in optimization-based spine muscle modeling. J Biomech 28 (1995) 401-409
50. Woittiez R.D., Huijing P.A., Boom H.B., and Rozendal R.H. A three-dimensional muscle model: a quantified relation between form and function of skeletal muscles. J Morphol 182 1 (1984) 95-113
51. Lee H.D., and Herzog W. Force enhancement following muscle stretch of electrically stimulated and voluntarily activated human adductor pollicis. J Physiol 545 (2002) 321-330
52. Rassier D.E., Herzog W., Wakeling J., and Syme D.A. Stretch-induced, steady-state force enhancement in single skeletal muscle fibers exceeds the isometric force at optimum fiber length. J Biomech 36 (2003) 1309-1316
53. Daggfeldt K., and Thorstensson A. The role of intra-abdominal pressure in spinal unloading. J Biomech 30 11-12 (1997) 1149-1155
54. Forster E., Simon U., Augat P., and Claes L. Extension of a state-of-the-art optimisation criterion to predict co-contraction. J Biomech 37 (2004) 577-581
55. Hughes R.E., Bean J.C., and Chaffin D.B. Evaluating the effect of co-contraction in optimization models. J Biomech 28 (1995) 875-878
56. Brand R.A., Pedersen D.R., and Friederich J.A. The sensitivity of muscle force predictions to changes in physiologic cross-sectional area. J Biomech 19 (1986) 589-596
57. Herzog W. Sensitivity of muscle force estimations to changes in muscle input parameters using nonlinear optimization approaches. J Biomech Eng 114 (1992) 267-268
58. Wilke H.J., Neef P., Hinz B., Seidel H., and Claes L. Intradiscal pressure together with anihropometric data-a data set for the validation of models. Clin Biomech 6 (2001) S111-S126
59. Shirazi-Adl A. Analysis of large compression loads on lumbar spine in flexion and in torsion using a novel wrapping element. J Biomech, in press.
60. Prilutsky B.I., Isaka T., Albrecht A.M., and Gregor R.J. Is coordination of two-joint leg muscles during load lifting consistent with the strategy of minimum fatigue?. J Biomech 31 (1998) 1025-1034
61. van Dieen J.H. Are recruitment patterns of the trunk musculature compatible with a synergy based on the maximization of endurance?. J Biomech 30 (1997) 1095-1100
62. Raikova R. Prediction of individual muscle forces using lagrange multipliers method-a model of the upper human limb in the sagittal plane: II. Numerical experiments and sensitivity analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 3 (2000) 167-182
63. Lavender S.A., Tsuang Y.H., Andersson G.B., Hafezi A., and Shin C.C. Trunk muscle cocontraction: the effects of moment direction and moment magnitude. J Orthop Res 10 5 (1992, Sep) 691-700
64. Raikova R. About weight factors in the non-linear objective functions used for solving indeterminate problems in biomechanics. J Biomech 32 (1999) 689-694
65. Natinal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1981. A work practices guide for manual lifting. Cincinnati, Ohio: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (NIOSH), pp. 30-43 [Technical Report No. 81-122].
66. McGill S.M. The biomechanics of low back injury: implications on current practice in industry and the clinic. J Biomech 30 (1997) 465-475
67. Prilutsky B.I., and Zatsiorsky V.M. Optimization-based models of muscle coordination. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 30 (2002) 32-38
68. Andersson E.A., Oddsson L.I., Grundstrom H., Nilsson J., and Thorstensson A. EMG activities of tie quadratus lumborum and erector spinal muscles during flexion-relaxation and other motor tasks. Clin Biomech 11 (1996) 392-400
69. Bogduk N., Pearcy M., and Hadfield G. Anatomy and biomechanics of the psoas major. Clin Biomech 7 (1992) 109-119
70. Hans J.S., Goel V.K., and Kumar S. A nonlinear optimization force model for human lumbar spine. Int J Ind Ergon 8 (1991) 289-301
71. Hughes R.E., and Chaffin D.B. The effect of strict muscle stress limits on abdominal muscle force predictions for combined torsion and extension loadings. J Biomech 28 (1995) 527-533
72. van Bolhuis B.M., and Gielen C.C. A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions. Biol Cybern 81 (1999) 249-261