Synchronous Prosthetic Implantation Through a Transscrotal Incision: An Outcome Analysis

Journal of Urology

Volumn 175, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 2218-2222

  Kendirci, Muammer ^a   Gupta, Sanjeev ^a   Shaw, Koushik ^a   Morey, Allen ^b   Jones, LeRoy ^c   Hakim, Larry ^d   Hellstrom, Wayne J G ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^b BROOKE ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

impotence; penis; prostheses and implants; urinary incontinence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFECTION RATE; LONG TERM CARE; MALE; PENIS PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCROTUM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETHRA; URINE INCONTINENCE; UROLOGY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; HUMANS; IMPOTENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PENILE IMPLANTATION; SCROTUM; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE; URINARY SPHINCTER, ARTIFICIAL; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MALE;

EID: 33646356201     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00345-4     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mulcahy J.J. Implantation of hydraulic penile prostheses. Atlas of the Urologic Clinics of North America (1993), W. B. Saunders Co, Philadelphia 71-92
2. Bryan D.E., Mulcahy J.J., and Simmons G.R. Salvage procedure for infected noneroded artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol 168 (2002) 2464
3. Hussain M., Greenwell T.J., Venn S.N., and Mundy A.R. The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of urinary incontinence. J Urol 174 (2005) 418
4. Petrou S.P., and Barret D.M. The expanded role for the artificial sphincter. AUA Update Series 10 (1991) 122
5. Scott F.B., Bradley W.E., and Timm G.W. Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol 112 (1974) 75
6. Montague D.K., and Angermeier K.W. Postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. the case for artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology 55 (2000) 2
7. American Medical Systems. Data on file, 2003
8. Hajivassiliou C.A. A review of the complications and results of implantation of the AMS artificial urinary sphincter. Eur Urol 35 (1999) 36
9. Motley R.C., and Barrett D.M. Artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion. Experience with reimplantation in 38 patients. Urology 35 (1990) 215
10. Venn S.N., Greenwell T.J., and Mundy A.R. The long-term outcome of artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol 164 (2000) 702
11. Garber B.B. Inflatable penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Expert Rev Med Devices 2 (2005) 341
12. Rajpurkar A., Fairfox M., Li H., and Dhabuwala C.B. Antibiotic soaked hydrophilic coated Bioflex. a new strategy in the prevention of penile prosthesis infection. J Sex Med 1 (2004) 215
13. Wolter C.E., and Hellstrom W.J.G. The hydrophilic-coated penile prosthesis. one-year experience. J Sex Med 1 (2004) 221
14. Garber B.B. Outpatient inflatable penile prosthesis insertion. Urology 49 (1997) 600
15. Carson C.C., Mulcahy J.J., Govier F.E., and AMS 700CX Study Group. Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis. results of a long-term multicenter study. J Urol 164 (2000) 376
16. Garber B.B., and Marcus S.M. Does surgical approach affect the incidence of inflatable penile prosthesis infection?. Urology 52 (1998) 291