Modeling competition between wild oat (Avena fatua L.) and yellow mustard or canola

Weed Science

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 102-109

  Daugovish, Oleg ^a   Thill, Donald C ^b   Shafii, Bahman ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative crops; Plant competition; Weed crop interference

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CANOLA; CROP YIELD; CROPPING PRACTICE; HARVESTING; SEED PRODUCTION; WEED;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

AVENA FATUA; BRASSICA; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; SINAPIS ALBA; SINAPIS ARVENSIS;

EID: 33646355942     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0102:MCBWOA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alcocer-Ruthling, M., D. C. Thill, and B. Shafii. 1992. Differential competitiveness of sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6:303-309.
2. Baker, R.J. 1981. Soil Survey of Latah County Area, Idaho. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Survey, 84 p.
3. Barbour, M. G., J. H. Burk, and W. D. Pitts. 1987. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings. 189 p.
4. Blackshaw, R. E., G. W. Anderson, and J. Dekker. 1987. Interference of Sinapis arvensis L. and Chenopodium album L. in spring rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Weed Res. 27:207-213.
5. Brown, P. 1995. Chemical Characteristics and Biological Effects of Brassica Allelochemicals. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 89 p.
6. Cousens, R. 1985. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models. J. Agric. Sci. 105:513-521.
7. Cudney, D. W., L. S. Jordan, and A. E. Hall. 1991. Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua) infestations on light interception and growth rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 39:175-179.
8. Daugovish, O. 2001. Competitive Ability of Yellow Mustard or Canola with Wild Oat and Rotational Effects of Yellow Mustard. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 135 p.
9. Daugovish, O., D. J. Lyon, and D. D. Baltesperger. 1999. Cropping systems to control winter annual grasses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 13:120-126.
10. Dew, D. A. and C. H. Keys. 1976. An index of competition for estimating loss of rape due to wild oats. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:1005-1006.
11. Esser, A. D. 1998. Agronomic and Economic Feasibility of Yellow Mustard (Sinapis alba L.) as an Alternative Crop in the Dryland Region of the Pacific Northwest. M.S. thesis. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. pp. 22-27.
12. Evans, R. M., D. C. Thill, L. Tapia, B. Shafii, and J. M. Lish. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) density affect spring barley yield. Weed Technol. 5:33-39.
13. Hammond, E. G. 1991. Organization of rapid analysis of lipids in many individual plants. Pages 321-330 in H. F. Linskens and J. F. Jackson, eds. Modern Methods of Plant Analysis. Volume 12. Essential Oils and Waxes. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
14. Howard, H. K. and J. K. Daun. 1991. Oil Content Determination in Oilseeds by NMR, Method of the Canadian Grain Commission Grain Research Laboratory. Winnipeg, Canada: Agriculture Canada. 5 p.
15. Morishita, D. W. and D. C. Thill. 1988. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and development in monoculture and mixed culture. Weed Sci. 36:43-48.
16. Nelson, D. C. and R. E. Nylund. 1962. Competition for peas growing for processing and weeds. Weeds 10:224-229.
17. O'Donovan, J. T. 1999. Effect of barley plant density on wild oat interference, shoot biomass and seed yield under zero tillage. Can. J. Plant Sci. 79:655-4562.
18. Ogawa, H. and K. Shinozaki. 1953. Intraspecific competition yield interrelationships in regulatory dispersed populations. J. Inst. Polytech. Osaka City Univ. Ser. D. 4:1-16.
19. Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190-198.
20. Radosevich, S. R. 1988. Methods to study crop and weed interactions. Pages 121-142 in M. A. Alteri and M. Liebman, eds. Weed Management for Agroecosytems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
21. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1991. SAS/STAT™ User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed., Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 943 p.
22. Spitters, C.J.T. 1983. An alternative approach to the analysis of mixed cropping experiments. I. Estimation of competition effects. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 31:1-11.
23. Thompson, C. R., D. C. Thill, and B. Shafii. 1994. Growth and competitiveness of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 42:172-179.
24. Vleeshouwers, L. M., J. C. Streibig, and I. Skovgaard. 1989. Assessment of competition between weeds and crops. Weed Res. 29:273-280.