Soft tissue management for difficult cervical restorations

General Dentistry

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 117-120

  Meraner, Mark ^a,b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Restorative Dentistry ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; GINGIVA; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT;

DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GINGIVA; HUMANS; RUBBER DAMS; SURGICAL FLAPS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASES; TOOTH PREPARATION; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 33646354162     PISSN: 03636771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Grippo JO, Simring M, Schreiner S. Attrition, abrasion, corrosion and abfraction revisited - A new perspective on tooth surface lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1109-1118.
2. Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM. Posterior resin-based composite: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:465-479.
3. ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. Direct and indirect restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:463-472.
4. Duke ES. The science and practice of den tal adhesive systems. Compend Contin Dent Educ 2003;24:417-424.
5. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials and their selection, ed. 3. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 2002:113-118.
6. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1. Am J Dent 2002;15:198-210.
7. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002;15:279-289.
8. Joynt RB, Davis EL, Schreier PH. Rubber dam usage among practicing dentists. Oper Dent 1989;14:176-181.
9. Marshall K, Page J. The use of rubber dam in the UK. A survey. Br Dent J 1990;169:286-291.
10. Roshan D, Curzon ME, Fairpo CG. Changes in dentists' attitudes and practice in paediatric dentistry. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;4:21-27.
11. Jones CM, Reid JS. Patient and operator attitudes toward rubber dam. ASDC J Dent Child 1988;55:452-454.
12. Stewardson DA, McHugh ES. Patients' attitudes to rubber dam. Int Endod J 2002;35:812-819.
13. Brackett WW, Scheid RC, Johnston WM, Cieslak JH. Attitudes of operative dentistry faculty toward rubber dam isolation. J Dent Educ 1989;53:725-726.
14. Small BW. The rubber dam - A first step toward clinical excellence. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23:276-282.
15. Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry, ed. 4. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 2002:444-465.
16. Small BW. Rubber dam - The easy way. Gen Dent 1999;47:30-33.
17. Marshall K. Rubber dam. Br Dent J 1998;184:218-219.
18. Liebenberg WH. Secondary retention of rubber dam: Effective moisture control access considerations. Quintessence Int 1995;26:243-252.
19. Brackett WB. Rubber dam isolation for Class V composite resin or glass ionomer restorations. Quintessence Int 1989;20:317-321.
20. Huband ML. A stabilized rubber dam clamp for cervical restorations: A case report. Va Dent J 1994;71:21-22.
21. Barnett ML. The role of therapeutic antimicrobial mouthrinses in clinical practice: Control of supragingival plaque and gingivitis. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:699-704.
22. Ciancio S. Expanded and future uses of mouthrinses. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125 Suppl 2:29S-32S.
23. Zambon JJ, Ciancio SG, Mather ML, Charles CH. The effect of an antimicrobial mouthrinse on early healing of gingival flap surgery wounds. J Periodontol 1989;60:31-34.
24. Yukna RA, Broxson AW, Mayer ET, Brite DL. Comparison of Listerine antiseptic mouthwash and periodontal dressing following periodontal flap surgery. I. Initial findings. Clin Prev Dent 1986;8:14-19.