Quality control and the substantive influence of environmental impact assessment in Finland

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 481-491

  Pölönen, Ismo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Alternatives; Effectiveness; Environmental impact assessment; Legislation; Quality control

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE; QUALITY CONTROL;

ALTERNATIVES; EFFECTIVENESS; EIA LEGISLATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION; QUALITY CONTROL;

EURASIA; EUROPE; EUROPEAN UNION; FINLAND; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA;

EID: 33646347094     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2005.11.005     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arts J. EIA Follow-up. On the Role of Ex Post Evaluation in Environmental Impact Assessment (1998), Geo Press, Groningen
2. Bunge T. Court actions relating to EIA in road construction in Germany. In: Environmental Law Network International (Ed). International Environmental Impact Assessment. European and Comparative Law and Practical Experience. Cameron May (1997) 64-75
3. Bunge T. Rechtschutz bei der UVP nach der Richtlinie 2003/35/EG. Zeitschrift für Umweltrecht 3/2004; 2004 p. 141-47.
4. COM(80) 313 final. Proposal for a Council Directive concerning the assessment of the environmental effects of certain public and private projects.
5. Commission. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the application and effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/33/EEC as amended 97/11/EC). How successful are the Member States in implementing the EIA Directive; 2003.
6. Deelstra Y., Nooteboom S.G., Kohlmann H.R., van den Berg J., and Innanen S. Using knowledge for decision-making purposes in the context of large projects in the Netherlands. Environ Impact Asses Rev 23 (2003) 517-541
7. de Sadeleer N. Environmental Principles. From Political Slogans to Legal Rules (2002), Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Kloepfer M. Umweltrecht vol. 3 (2004), Auflage, München
9. Krämer L. Focus on European Environmental Law. second edition (1997), Sweet and Maxwell, London
10. Krämer L. EC Environmental Law. fourth edition (2000), Sweet and Maxwell, London
11. Meyerholt U. Das Prinzip Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung-europäischer Schrittmacher für das Umweltrecht. In: Klusmeyer J., Meyerholt U., and Wengelowski P. (Eds). Umwelt-Arbeit-Bildung (2003) 43-62
12. Pieters S. Jurisprudentie milieueffectraportage. Jurisprudentie en toelichting (2004), Sdu Uitgevers, Den Haag
13. Pölönen I. Ympäristövaikutusten arviointimenettely ympäristöoikeudellisena instrumenttina (Environmental Impact Assessment as an Environmental Policy Instrument) (2004), University of Joensuu. Publications in Law 9, Joensuu
14. Scott J. EC Environmental Law. European Law Series (1998), Longman, London
15. Soppe M., and Pieters S. The Dutch courts and EIA: troubleshooter or troublemaker?. Environmental Impact Assessment in the Netherlands. Views from the Commission for EIA in 2002. Utrecht (2002) 31-34
16. Tromans S., and Fuller K. Environmental impact assessment-law and practice. Butterworth Environmental Law Series, Chippenham (2003)
17. van Breda L.M., and Dijkema G.P.J. EIA's contribution to environmental decision-making on large chemical plants. Environ Impact Asses Rev 18 (1998) 391-410
18. Vihervuori P. Environmental Law. Supplement 42, Finland. International Encyclopaedia of Laws. Edited by Deketelaere, K. Kluwer Law International, The Hague; 2003.