Competition between wild oat (Avena fatua) and yellow mustard (Sinapis alba) or canola (Brassica napus)

Weed Science

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 587-594

  Daugovish, Oleg ^a   Thill, Donald C ^a   Shafii, Bahman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative crops; Plant competition; Weed crop interference

Indexed keywords

ACCUMULATION; ALTERNATIVE AGRICULTURE; BIOMASS; CANOPY; CEREAL; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); GREENHOUSE EFFECT; LEAF; WEED;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

AVENA FATUA; BRASSICA; BRASSICA NAPUS; BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS; SINAPIS; SINAPIS ALBA; SINAPIS ARVENSIS;

EID: 33646342777     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0587:CBWOAF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barbour, M. G., J. H. Burk, and W. D. Pitts. 1987. Terrestrial Plant Ecology. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings. 189 p.
2. Brennan, J. S. 1995. Assessment of Weed Competition in Spring-Planted Canola (Brassica napus L.). Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 78 p.
3. Brown, P. 1995. Chemical Characteristics and Biological Effects of Brassica Allelochemicals. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 29 p.
4. Brown, J., J. P. McCaffrey, and B. L. Harmon. 1999. Effect of late season insect infestation on yield, yield components and oil quality of Brassica napus, B. rapa, B. juncea and Sinapis alba in Pacific Northwest of United States. J. Agric. Sci. 132:281-288.
5. Chow, P.N.P. and D. G. Dorrell. 1979. Response of wild oat (Avena fatua), flax (Linum usitissimum) and rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) to diclofop-methyl. Weed Sci. 27:212-215.
6. Cudney, D. W., L. S. Jordan, and A. E. Hall. 1991. Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua) infestations on light interception and growth rate of wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 39:175-179.
7. Daugovish, O. 2001. Competitive Ability of Yellow Mustard (Sinapis alba L.) and Spring Canola (Brassica napus L.) with Wild Oat and Rotational Effects of Yellow Mustard. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 87 p.
8. Dehaan, R. L., D. L. Wyse, N. J. Ehlke, B. D. Maxwell, and D. H. Putnam. 1994. Simulation of spring-seeded smother plants for weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 42:35-43.
9. Dew, D. A. and C. H. Keys. 1976. An index of competition for estimating loss of rape due to wild oats. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:1005-1006.
10. de Wit, C. T. 1960. On competition. Versl. Landbouwkd. Onderz. 66:1-82.
11. Draper, N. R. and H. Smith. 1999. Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. New York: J. Wiley. 736 p.
12. Esser, A. D. 1998. Agronomic and Economic Feasibility of Yellow Mustard (Sinafis alba L.) as an Alternative Crop in the Dryland Region of the Pacific Northwest. M.S. thesis. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. 156 p.
13. Evans, R. M., D. C. Thill, L. Tapia, B. Shafii, and J. M. Lish. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) density affect spring barley grain. Weed Technol. 5:33-39.
14. Haizel, K. A. 1972a. The canopy relationships of pure and mixed populations of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), white mustard (Sinafis alba L.) and wild oats (Avena fatua L.). J. Appl. Ecol. 9:589-600.
15. Haizel, K. A. 1972b. The productivity of mixtures of two and three species. J. Appl. Ecol. 9:601-608.
16. Keys, C. H. 1974. Effect of wild oat competition (time of removal) on rapeseed reproduction. Res. Rep. Can. Weed Comm. (West. Sec.):490.
17. Marshall, G., I. N. Morrison, L. Friesen, and W. Rother. 1989. Effects of 'volunteer' wheat and barley on the growth and yield of rapeseed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 69:445-453.
18. Morishita, D. W. and D. C. Thill. 1988. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and development in monoculture and mixed culture. Weed Sci. 36:43-48.
19. Morishita, D. W., D. C. Thill, and J. E. Hammel. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) interference in a greenhouse experiment. Weed Sci. 39:149-153.
20. Nelson, D. C. and R. E. Nylund. 1962. Competition for peas growing for processing and weeds. Weeds 10:224-229.
21. O'Donovan, J. T. 1992. Seed yields of canola and volunteer barley as influenced by their relative time of emergence. Can. J. Plant Sci. 72: 263-267.
22. Radosevich, S. R. 1988. Methods to study crop and weed interactions. Pages 121-142 in Weed Management in Agroecosytems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
23. Richardson, M. J. 1980. Yield loss in barley associated with Sinapis arvensis L. (charlock) after continuous routine use of herbicide. Weed Res. 20: 295-298.
24. Roush, M. L. and Radosevich, S. R. 1985. Relationship between growth and competitiveness of four annual weeds. J. Appl. Ecol. 22:895.
25. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1991. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed, Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 943 p.