Event-condition-action rules on RDF metadata in P2P environments

Computer Networks

Volumn 50, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1513-1532

  Papamarkos, George ^a   Poulovassilis, Alexandra ^a   Wood, Peter T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Event condition action rules; Peer to peer networks; RDF; Reactive functionality; Resource description framework

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; DATA RECORDING; SEMANTICS; TECHNICAL WRITING; TECHNOLOGY;

ATOMICITY REQUIREMENTS; CONFERENCE OF SETS; EVENT-CONDITION-ACTION RULES; PEER-TO-PEER NETWORKS; RDF; REACTIVE FUNCTIONALITY; RESOURCE DESCRIPTION FRAMEWORK;

METADATA;

EID: 33646341986     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2005.10.022     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. S. Abiteboul, O. Benjelloun, I. Manolescu, T. Milo, R. Weber, Active XML: peer-to-peer data and web services integration, in: Proc. 28th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 2002, pp. 1087-1090.
2. Abiteboul S., Cluet S., Ferran G., and Rousset M.-C. The Xyleme project. Computer Networks 39 (2002) 225-238
3. A. Adi, D. Botzer, O. Etzion, T. Yatzkar-Haham, Push technology personalization through event correlation, in: Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 2000, pp. 643-645.
4. Aiken A., Widom J., and Hellerstein J.M. Behaviour of database production rules: termination, confluence and observable determinism. Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data (1992), ACM Press 59-68
5. Aiken A., Widom J., and Hellerstein J.M. Static analysis techniques for predicting the behavior of active database rules. ACM TODS 20 1 (1995) 3-41
6. S. Alexaki, V. Christophides, G. Karvounarakis, D. Plexousakis, K. Tolle, The ICS-FORTH RDFSuite: managing voluminous RDF description bases, in: Proc. 2nd. Int. Workshop on the Semantic Web, 2001.
7. J. Bailey, A. Poulovassilis, An abstract interpretation framework for termination analysis of active rules, in: Proc. 7th Int. Workshop on Database Programming Languages, LNCS 1949, Kinloch Rannoch, Scotland, 1999, pp. 249-266.
8. J. Bailey, A. Poulovassilis, P. Newson, A dynamic approach to termination analysis for active database rules, in: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Computational Logic (DOOD stream), LNCS 1861, London, 2000, pp. 1106-1120.
9. J. Bailey, A. Poulovassilis, P. Wood, An event-condition-action language for XML, in: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on the World Wide Web, 2002, pp. 486-495.
10. Bailey J., Poulovassilis A., and Wood P. Analysis and optimisation for event-condition-action rules on XML. Computer Networks 39 (2002) 239-259
11. Baralis E., Ceri S., and Paraboschi S. Improved rule analysis by means of triggering and activation graphs. In: Sellis T. (Ed). Rules in Database Systems, LNCS 985 (1995), Springer 165-181
12. Baralis E., Ceri S., and Paraboschi S. Compile-time and runtime analysis of active behaviors. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10 3 (1998) 353-370
13. E. Baralis, J. Widom, An algebraic approach to rule analysis in expert database systems, in: Proc. 20th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, Santiago, Chile, 1994, pp. 475-486.
14. Baralis E., and Widom J. An algebraic approach to static analysis of active database rules. ACM TODS 25 3 (2000) 269-332
15. A. Bonifati, D. Braga, A. Campi, S. Ceri, Active XQuery, in: Proc. 18th Int. Conf. on Data Engineering, 2002, pp. 403-418.
16. Bonifati A., Ceri S., and Paraboschi S. Active rules for XML: a new paradigm for e-services. VLDB Journal 10 1 (2001) 39-47
17. A. Bonifati, S. Ceri, S. Paraboschi, Pushing reactive services to XML repositories using active rules, in: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. on the World Wide Web, 2001, pp. 633-641.
18. Buchmann A., et al. DREAM: distributed reliable event-based application management. In: Levene M., and Poulovassilis A. (Eds). Web Dynamics (2004), Springer 319-352
19. S. Ceri, R. Cochrane, J. Widom, Practical applications of triggers and constraints: success and lingering issues, in: Proc. 26th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 2000, pp. 254-262.
20. Ceri S., and Fraternali P. Designing Database Applications with Objects and Rules: The IDEA Method (1997), Addison-Wesley
21. S. Ceri, P. Fraternali, S. Paraboschi, Data-driven one-to-one web site generation for data-intensive applications, in: Proc. 25th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 1999, pp. 615-626.
22. P.-A. Chirita, S. Idreos, M. Koubarakis, W. Nejdl. Publish/subscribe for RDF-based P2P networks, in: Proc. ESWS 2004, Heraklion, Crete, 2004, pp. 182-197.
23. E. Cho, I. Park, S.J. Hyun, M. Kim, ARML: an active rule mark-up language for heterogeneous active information systems, in: Proc. RuleML 2002, Sardinia, June 2002.
24. V. Christophides et al., The ICS-FORTH SWIM: a powerful semantic web integration middleware, in: Proc. SWDB 2003, 2003, pp. 381-393.
25. A. Crespo, H. Garcia-Molina, Routing indices for peer-to-peer systems, in: Proc. ICDCS 2002, Vienna, 2002, pp. 23-34.
26. Eugster P.T., Felber P.A., Guerraoui R., and Kermarrec A.-M. The many faces of publish/subscribe. ACM Computing Surveys 35 2 (2003) 114-131
27. L. Galanis, Y. Wang, S.R. Jeffery, D. DeWitt, Locating data sources in large distributed systems, in: Proc. 29th Int. Conf. on Very Large Data Bases, 2003, pp. 874-885.
28. H. Garcia-Molina, H. Salem, Sagas, in: Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, 1987, pp. 249-259.
29. P. Haase, J. Broekstra, A. Eberhart, R. Volz, A comparison of RDF query languages, in: Proc. 3rd Int. Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, 2004, pp. 502-517.
30. Haller K., Schuldt H., and Schek H. Transactional peer-to-peer information processing: the AMOR approach. 4th Int. Conf. on Mobile Data Management (2003), Springer
31. Jacob J., Sanka A., Pandrangi N., and Chakravarthy S. WebVigil: an approach to just-in-time information propagation in large network-centric environments. In: Levene M., and Poulovassilis A. (Eds). Web Dynamics (2004), Springer 301-318
32. Jena: A Semantic Web Framework for Java. Available from: .
33. JXTA Framework. Available from: .
34. V. Kantere, I. Kiringa, J. Mylopoulos, A. Kemenstiestides, M. Arenas, Coordinating peer databases using ECA rules, in: Proc. DBISP2P 2003, 2003, pp. 108-133.
35. K. Keenoy et al., Self e-Learning Networks-Functionality, User Requirements and Exploitation Scenarios. Available from: , 2003. SeLeNe Deliverable 2.2.
36. K. Keenoy, M. Levene, D. Peterson, Personalisation and Trails in Self e-Learning Networks. Available from: , 2003. SeLeNe Deliverable 4.2.
37. S. Kokkelink, Transforming RDF with RDFPath. Available from: , March 2001.
38. G. Kokkinidis, V. Christophides, Semantic query routing and processing in P2P database systems: the ICS-FORTH SQPeer middleware, in: Proc. EDBT Workshops, 2004, pp. 486-495.
39. G. Koloniari, E. Pitoura, Content-based routing of path queries in peer-to-peer systems, in: Proc. EDBT'03, 2003, pp. 29-47.
40. Korth H., Levy E., and Silberschatz A. A formal approach to recovery by compensating transactions. VLDB Journal (1990) 95-106
41. Kotz-Dittrich A., and Simon E. Active database systems: expectations, commercial experience and beyond. In: Paton N. (Ed). Active Rules in Database Systems (1999), Springer 367-404
42. M. Magiridou, S. Sahtouris, V. Christophides, M. Koubarakis, RUL: a declarative update language for RDF, in: Proc. 4th Int. Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'05), Galway, Ireland, 2005.
43. P. McBrien, A. Poulovassilis, Defining peer-to-peer integration using both as view rules, in: Proc. DBISP2P 2003, 2003, pp. 91-107.
44. W. Nejdl, B. Wolf, C. Qu, S. Decker, M. Sintek, A. Naeve, M. Nilsson, M. Palmer, T. Risch, EDUTELLA: a P2P networking infrastructure based on RDF, in: Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on the World Wide Web, 2002, pp. 604-615.
45. W. Nejdl, M. Wolpers, W. Siberski, C. Schmitz, M. Schlosser, I. Brunkhorst, A. Loser, Super-peer-based routing and clustering strategies for RDF-based peer-to-peer networks, in: Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on the World Wide Web, 2003, pp. 536-543.
46. B. Nguyen, S. Abiteboul, G. Cobena, M. Preda. Monitoring XML data on the web, in: Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, 2001, pp. 437-448.
47. Paton N. Active Rules in Database Systems (1999), Springer
48. J. Pereira, F. Fabret, F. Llirbat, D. Shasha, Efficient matching for web-based publish/subscribe systems, in: Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS'2000), 2000, pp. 162-173.
49. REWERSE Project, Deliverable i5-d1: state-of-the-art on evolution and reactivity. Available from: .
50. A. Souzis. RxPath specification proposal. Available from: .
51. Tatarinov I., Ives Z., Madhavan J., Halevy A., Suciu D., Dalvi N., Dong X., Kadiyska Y., Miklau G., and Mork P. The Piazza peer data management project. SIGMOD Record 32 3 (2003) 47-52
52. M.-R. Tazari, A context-oriented RDF database, in: Proc. SWDB 2003, 2003, pp. 63-78.
53. W3C, XML Path Language (XPath), 1999.
54. W3C, RDF Semantics, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, 2004.
55. W3C, RDF Vocabulary Description Language 1.0: RDF Schema, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, 2004.
56. W3C, RDF/XML Syntax Specification, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, 2004.
57. G. Wagner, How to design a general rule markup language? in: Invited talk at the Workshop XML Technologien für das Semantic Web (XSW 2002), Berlin, June, 2002, pp. 19-37.
58. Widom J., and Ceri S. Active Database Systems (1995), Morgan-Kaufmann, San MateoCalifornia