The role of exogenous factors in technology acceptance: The case of object-oriented technology

Information and Management

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 469-480

  Lee, Sang M ^a   Kim, Injai ^b   Rhee, Shanggeun ^c   Trimi, Silvana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b Dongguk University   (South Korea)

^c KEAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Exogenous factors in acceptance of OO technology; Information technology acceptance; Object oriented technology; Perceived behavioral control

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

EXOGENOUS FACTORS IN ACCEPTANCE OF OO TECHNOLOGY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; OBJECT-ORIENTED TECHNOLOGY; PERCEIVED BEHAVIORAL CONTROL;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33646339652     PISSN: 03787206     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2005.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Adams D.A., Nelson R.R., and Todd P.A. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication. MIS Quarterly 16 2 (1992) 227-247
2. I. Ajzen, From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior, in: J. Kuhl, J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Springer, Heidelberg, vol. 985, pp. 11-39.
3. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (1991) 179-211
4. Ajzen I., and Madden T. Prediction of goal-directed behavior: attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22 (1986) 453-474
5. M.B. Alexander, The adoption and implementation of computer technology in organizations: the example of database machines, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Indiana University, 1989.
6. Amoroso D.L., and Cheney P.H. Testing a causal model of end-user application effectiveness. Journal of Management Information Systems 8 1 (1991) 63-89
7. Bayer J., and Melone N. A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations. The Journal of Systems and Software 9 (1989) 161-166
8. Bentler P.M., and Bonett D.G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88 (1980) 588-606
9. Bentler P.M., and Chou C. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research 16 (1987) 78-117
10. Browne M.W., and Cudeck R. Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivaraite Behavioral Research 24 (1989) 445-455
11. Chen L., Gillenson M.L., and Sherrell D.L. Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & Management 39 8 (2002) 705-719
12. Cho I., and Kim Y. Critical factors for assimilation of object-oriented programming languages. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 3 (2002) 125-156
13. Coleman J.S. Social theory, social research, and a theory of action. American Journal of Sociology 91 (1986) 1309-1335
14. Compeau D.R., and Higgins C.A. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly 19 (1995) 189-211
15. F.D. Davis, A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end user information systems: theory and results, Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT, 1986.
16. Davis F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly (1989) 319-339
17. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 8 (1989) 982-1003
18. DeLone W.H. Determinants of success for computer usage in small business. MIS Quarterly 12 1 (1988) 51-61
19. Detienne F. Design strategies and knowledge in object-oriented programming effects of experience. Human-Computer Interaction 10 (1995) 129-169
20. Detienne F., and Rist R. Introduction of this special issue on empirical studies of object-oriented design. Human-Computer Interaction 10 (1995) 121-128
21. Fishbein M., and Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
22. Gist M.E. Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review 12 (1987) 472-485
23. Hartwick J., and Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Science 40 (1994) 440-465
24. Igbaria M., Guimaraes T., and Davis G.B. Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems 11 4 (1995) 87-114
25. Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., and Cavaye A.L.M. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: a structural equation model. MIS Quarterly 21 3 (1997) 279-305
26. James L.R., Mulaik S.A., and Brett J.M. Causal Analysis, Assumptions, Models and Data (1982), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
27. Jiang J.J., Muhanna W.A., and Klein G. User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types. Information & Management 37 1 (2000) 25-36
28. Joreskog K.G., and Sorbom D. LISREL 8 Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language (1993), Scientific Software International, Chicago
29. Krol M., and Reich D. Object-oriented analysis and design of a health care management information system. Journal of Medical Systems 23 2 (1999) 145-158
30. Kwon T.H., and Zmud R.W. Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation (1987), John Wiley & Sons, New York
31. Lee S.M. South Korea: from the land of morning calm to ICT hotbed. Academy of Management Executive 17 2 (2003) 7-18
32. Lee S.M., and Asllani A. A decision support system for health care services. Hospital Material Management Quarterly 105 2 (2001) 64-70
33. Leonard-Barton D. Implementing structured software methodologies: a case of innovation in process technology. Interfaces 17 3 (1987) 6-17
34. Leonard-Barton D., and Deschamps I. Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Science 34 (1988) 1252-1265
35. Mathieson K. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research 2 3 (1991) 173-191
36. Mathieson K., Peacock E., and Chin W.W. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 32 3 (2001) 86-112
37. Moigne J.L., and Sibley E.H. Information-organization-decision: some strange loops. Information and Management 11 5 (1986) 237-244
38. Montazemi A.R. Factors affecting information satisfaction in the context of the small business environment. MIS Quarterly 12 2 (1988) 239-256
39. Moore G.C., and Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 (1991) 192-222
40. Pennington N., Lee A.T., and Rehder B. Cognitive activities and levels of abstraction in procedural and object-oriented design. Human-Computer Interaction 10 (1995) 171-226
41. Purao S., Jain H.K., and Nazareth D.L. An approach to distribution of object-oriented applications in loosely coupled networks. Journal of Management Information Systems 18 3 (2001) 195-234
42. Raymond L. Organizational characteristics and MIS success in the context of small business. MIS Quarterly 9 1 (1985) 37-52
43. Raymond L. End-user computing in the small business context: foundations and directions for research. Database 20 4 (1990) 20-26
44. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovation (1983), The Free Press, New York
45. Rothwell R., and Zegveld W. Reindustrialization and Technology (1985), Sharpe Inc., Armonk, NY
46. Straub D., Limayem M., and Karahanna E.E. Measuring system usage: implications for IS theory testing. Management Science 41 8 (1995) 1328-1342
47. Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Science 42 1 (1996) 85-92
48. Taylor S., and Todd P.A. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research 6 2 (2001) 144-146
49. Terry D.J., and O'Leary J.E. The theory of planned behavior: the effects of perceived behavioral control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology 34 (1995) 199-220
50. Thompson R.L., Higgins C.A., and Howell J.M. Personal computing: towards a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly 15 1 (1991) 125-143
51. Tornatzky L.G., and Klein K.J. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: a meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management EM 29 1 (1982) 28-45
52. Venkatesh V. Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly 23 2 (1999) 239-260
53. Venkatesh V., and Davis F.D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science 46 2 (2000) 186-204
54. Venkatesh V., Morris M.G., Davis G.B., and Davis F.D. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 3 (2003) 425-478
55. Yap C.S., Soh P.P., and Raman K.S. Information systems success factors in small business. Omega 20 5/6 (1992) 597-609
56. Zmud R.W. Individual differences and MIS success: a review of the empirical literature. Management Science 25 10 (1979) 960-978
57. Zmud R.W. An examination of push-pull theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Science 30 6 (1984) 727-738