Local image structures and optic flow estimation

Network: Computation in Neural Systems

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 341-356

  Kalkan, S ^a   Calow, D ^b   Worgotter F ^a   Lappe, M ^b   Kruger N ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^c AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Image structures; Intrinsic dimension; Optic flow

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; ORIENTATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 33646269526     PISSN: 0954898X     EISSN: 13616536     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09548980500445005     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alvarez L, Weickert J, Sanchez J. 2000. Reliable estimation of dense optical flow fields with large displacements. Int. J. Computer Vision 39:41-56.
2. Barron JL, Fleet DJ, Beauchemin SS. 1994. Performance of optical flow techniques. Int J Computer Vision 1:43-77.
3. Bayerl P, Neumann H. Disambiguating visual motion by form - motion interaction - a computational model. Int. J. Computer Vision (Special Issue) (in press).
4. Brox T, Bruhn A, Papenberg N, Weickert J. 2004. High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping. Proceeding of ECCV 2004.
5. Calow D, Krüger N, Wörgötter F, Lappe M. 2004. Statistics of optic flow for self-motion through natural scenes. Proc. Dynamic Perception Workshop. pp. 133-138.
6. Canny J. 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 8:679-698.
7. Cavanagh P, Mather G. 1989. Motion: the long and the short of it. Spatial Vision 4:103-129.
8. Coppola DM, Purves HR, McCoy AN, Purves D. 1998. The distribution of oriented contours in the real world. PNAS 4002-4006.
9. Coxeter HSM. 1969. Introduction to Geometry (2nd ed.). Chichester, Wiley & Sons.
10. Felsberg M. 2002. Low-Level Image Processing with the Structure Multivector. PhD thesis, Institute of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel.
11. Felsberg M, Krüger N. 2003. A probablistic definition of intrinsic dimensionality for images. Pattern Recognition, 24th DAGM Symposium.
12. Fermueller C, Shulman D, Aloimonos Y. 2001. The statistics of optical flow. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 82:1-32.
13. Fleet DJ, Jepson AD. 1990. Computation of component image velocity from local phase information. Int J Computer Vision 5:77-104.
14. Gautama T, Van Hulle MM. 2002. A phase-based approach to the estimation of the optical flow field using spatial filtering. IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks 13:1127-1136.
15. Granlund GH, Knutsson, H. 1995. Signal Processing for Computer Vision. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Huang J, Lee AB, Mumford D. 2000. Statistics of range images. CVPR 1:1324-1331.
17. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. 1969. Anatomical demonstration of columns in the monkey striate cortex. Nature 221:747-750.
18. Jähne, B. 1997. Digital Image Processing - Concepts, Algorithms, and Scientific Applications. New York, Springer.
19. Johnston A, Clifford CWG. 1995. A unified account of three apparent motion illusions. Vision Res 35:1109-1123.
20. Kalkan S, Calow D, Felsberg M, Wörgötter F, Lappe M, Krüger N. 2004. Optic flow statistics and intrinsic dimensionality. Proc. of Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems, Scotland, available at http://www.cs.stir.ac.uk/lss/BICS2004/CD/toc.html.
21. Koenderink JJ, Dorn AJ. 1982. The shape of smooth objects and the way contours end. Perception 11:129-173.
22. Krüger N. 1998. Collinearity and parallelism are statistically significant second order relations of complex cell responses. Neural Processing Letters 8:117-129.
23. Krüger N, Felsberg M. 2003. A continuous formulation of intrinsic dimension. Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference.
24. Krüger N, Felsberg M, Wörgötter F. 2004. Processing multi-modal primitives from image sequences. Fourth International ICSC Symposium on ENGINEERING OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS.
25. Krüger N, Wörgötter F. 2004. Statistical and deterministic regularities: Utilisation of motion and grouping in biological and artificial visual systems. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics 131:82-147.
26. Lappe M, Bremmer F, van den Berg AV. 1999. Perception of self-motion from visual flow. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3:329-336.
27. Lucas B, Kanade T. 1981. An iterative image registration technique with an application to stereo vision. Proc. DARPA Image Understanding Workshop pp. 121-130.
28. Mota C, Barth E. 2000. On the uniqueness of curvature features. Proc. in Artificial Intelligence 9:175-178.
29. Nagel H-H, Enkelmann W. 1986. An investigation of smoothness constraints for the estimation of displacement vector fields from image sequences. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 8:565-593.
30. Nagel H-H, Haag M. 1998. Bias-corrected optical flow estimation for road vehicle tracking. Proc. International Conference on Computer Vision, Bombay, India pp. 1006-1011.
31. Parida L, Geiger D, Hummel R. 1998. Junctions: detection, classification and reconstruction. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20:687-698.
32. Princen J, Illingworth J, Kittler J. 1990. An optimizing line finder using a Hough transform algorithm. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Proc 52:57-77.
33. Ribeiro E, Hancock ER. 2001. Shape from periodic texture using the eigenvectors of local affine distortion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23:1459-1465.
34. Rohr K. 1992. Recognizing corners by fitting parametric models. Int J Computer Vision 9:213-230.
35. Rosenhahn B. 2003. Pose Estimation Revisited PhD Thesis. Institut für Informatik und praktische Mathematik, Chrsitian - Albrechts Universität Kiel.
36. Rosenhahn B, Sommer G. 2002. Adaptive pose estimation for different corresponding entities. In L. van Gool, editor, Pattern Recognition, 24th DAGM Symposium pp. 265-273. Springer Verlag.
37. Shevelev IA, Lazareva NA, Tikhomirov AS, Sharev GA. 1995. Sensitivity to cross-like figures in the cat striate neurons. Neuroscience 61:965-973.
38. Shevlin F. 1998. Analysis of orientation problems using Plücker lines. Int Conference on Pattern Recognition, Bisbane 1:65-689.
39. Simoncelli EP, Adelson EH, Heeger DJ. 1991. Probability distributions of optical flow. Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Main, Hawaii pp. 310-315.
40. Sochen N, Kimmel R, Malladi R. 1998. A general framework for low level vision. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 7:310-318.
41. Wegmann B, Zetzsche C. 1990. Statistical dependence between orientation filter outputs used in a human-vision-based image code. In Proc. SPIE Vol. 1360, p. 909-923, Visual Communications and Image Processing '90: Fifth in a Series, Murat Kunt; Ed. pp. 909-923, September 1990.
42. Zetzsche C, Barth E. 1990. Fundamental limits of linear filters in the visual processing of two dimensional signals. Vision Research 30:1111-1117.
43. Zetzsche C, Barth E, Berkmann J. 1991. Spatio-temporal curvature measures for flow field analysis. Geometric Methods in Computer Vision 1570:337-350.