Adhesion between prefabricated fiber-reinforced posts and different composite resin cores: A microtensile bond strength evaluation

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 113-117

  Salameh, Ziad ^a   Papacchini, Federica ^a   Ounsi, Hani F ^b,c   Goracci, Cecilia ^a   Tashkandi, Esam ^d   Ferrari, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b SAINT JOSEPH UNIVERSITY   (Lebanon)

^c Dental Development and Research Foundation   (Lebanon)

^d KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Bond strength; Composite resin; Core material; Dual cure composites; Microtensile testing; Prefabricated FRC post

Indexed keywords

FILTEK FLOW; FILTEK Z250; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; MONOBOND S; MULTICORE FLOW; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; TETRIC CERAM; TETRIC FLOW COMPOSITE RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; SILANES; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 33646267196     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ainamo A, Osterberg T. Changing Demographic and oral disease patterns and treatment needs in the Scandinavian populations of old people. Int Dent J 1992;42:311-322.
2. Akkayan B, Gulmetz T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:431-437.
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-278.
4. Bouillaguet S, Troesch S, Wataha JC, Krejci I, Meyer JM, Pashley DM. Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin. Dent Mater 2003;19:199-205.
5. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. New concept of coronoradicular reconstruction: the Composipost (1). Chir Dent Fr 1990;60:131-141.
6. Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber posts: characteristics and clinical applications. Milan: Masson, 2002.
7. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study on 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
8. Freedman G. A look at posts and cores. Dent Today 2002;21:118-125.
9. Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:341-347.
10. Goracci C, Raffaelli O, Monticelli F, Balleri B, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. The adhesion between prefabricated FRC posts and composite resin cores: microtensile bond strength with and without post silanization. Dent Mater 2005;21:437-444.
11. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:39-44.
12. Isidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:257-261.
13. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-158.
14. Monticelli F, Goracci C, Grandini S, Garcia-Godoy F, Ferrari M. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber post-resin core units built up with different resin composite materials. Am J Dent 2005;18:61-65.
15. Monticelli F, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Micromorphology of the fiber post resin core unit: a scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Dent Mater 2004;20:176-183.
16. Monticelli F, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Clinical behavior of translucent-fiber posts: A 2-year prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:593-596.
17. Monticelli F, Tranchesi-Sadek F, Goracci C, Tay F, Ferrari M. Caracteristiche dell'adesione al perno in fibra di diversi materiali compositi: test di adesione microtensile [abstract]. G It Endo 2004;18:76-77.
18. Potashnic S, Weine F, Strauss S. Restoration of endodontically treated tooth. In: Weine F (ed). Endodontic therapy, ed 4. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1989:640-684.
19. Reagan SE, Fruits TJ, Van Brunt CL, Ward CK. Effects of cycling loading on selected posts and core systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30:61-67.
20. Rosen H. Operative procedures on mutilated endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:976-986.
21. Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Hardel G. Comparison in vitro fracture, strength of metallic and tooth-colored posts and core. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:595-601.
22. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence, 1981:147.
23. Sjôgren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498-504.
24. Sornkul E, Stannard JG. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992;18:440-443.
25. Steel JG, Treasure E, Pitts NB, Morris J, Bradnock G. Total tooth loss in the United Kingdom in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J 2000;189:598-603.
26. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstadt L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-111.
27. Trope M, Ray HL. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:99-102.