Designing learner-controlled educational interactions based on learning/cognitive style and learner behaviour

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 356-384

  Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A ^a   Mabbott, Andrew ^b   Bull, Susan ^b   Grigoriadou, Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Adaptive educational systems; Cognitive style; Individual differences; Learner control; Learning style; Personalisation

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; WEBSITES;

ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS; COGNITIVE STYLES; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; LEARNER CONTROL; LEARNING STYLES; PERSONALISATION;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646265737     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Andris J. The relationship of indices of student navigational patterns in a hypermedia geology lab simulation to two measures of learning style. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 5 (1996) 303-315
2. Bajraktarkvic, N., Hall, W., Fullick, P., 2003. Incorporating learning styles in a hypermedia environment. 14th Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Nottingham, pp. 41-52.
3. Barab S.A., and Duffy T.M. From practice fields to communities of practice. In: Jonassen D.H., and Land S.M. (Eds). Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 25-56
4. Brusilovsky P., and Peylo C. Adaptive and intelligent Web-based educational systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13 (2003) 156-169
5. Bull S. Promoting effective learning strategy use in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal 10 1 (1997) 3-39
6. Bull S., 2004. Supporting learning with open learner models. Proceedings of fourth Hellenic Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens, Greece, pp. 47-61.
7. Bull S., Kay J., 2005. A framework for designing and analysing open learner modelling. Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 81-90.
8. Bull S., Pain H., 1995. Did i say what i think i said, and do you agree with me?: Inspecting and questioning the student model, World Conference on AIED, AACE, pp. 501-508.
9. Bull S., Mangat M., Mabbott A., Abu Issa A.S., Marsh J., 2005. Reactions to inspectable learner models: seven year olds to University students. Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 1-10.
10. Calcaterra A., Antonietti A., and Underwood J. Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers and Education 44 (2005) 441-457
11. Carver C.A., Howard R.A., and Lane W.D. Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of learning styles. IEEE Transactions on Education 42 1 (1999) 33-38
12. Chen S.Y., Paul R.J. (Eds.), 2003. Special Issue on Individual Differences in Web-based Instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology 34 (4), 385.
13. Dimitrova V. StyLE-OLM: interactive open earner modellingl. International Journal of AI in Education 13 1 (2003) 35-78
14. Entwistle N. Styles of Learning and Teaching: An Integrated Outline of Educational Psychology (1981), Wiley, Chichester
15. Felder R.M., and Silverman L.K. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education 78 7 (1988) 674-681
16. Ford N., and Chen S.Y. Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 9 (2000) 281-312
17. Ford N., and Chen S.Y. Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology 32 (2001) 5-22
18. Gilbert J.E., Han C.Y., 1999. Adapting instruction in search of 'a significant difference'. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 22, pp. 149-160. Available online at: www.idealibrary.com.
19. Harris R.N., Dwyer W.O., and Leeming F.C. Are learning styles relevant in Web-based instruction?. Journal of Educational Computing Research 29 1 (2003) 13-28
20. Honey, P., Mumford, A., 1992. In: Honey, P., (Ed.), The Manual of Learning Styles, Maidenhead.
21. Jonassen, D.H., Grabowski, B.L., 1993. Handbook of individual differences: Learning and instruction, Hove: LEA.
22. Karagiannidis C., Sampson D., 2004. Adaptation rules relating learning styles research and learning objects metadata. In: Magoulas G., Chen S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia in AH2004, Part I, Eidhoven, Nederlands, pp. 60-69.
23. Kay, J., 1997. Learner know thyself: student models to give learner control and responsibility. International Conference on Computers in Education, Kuching, Malaysia, pp. 18-26.
24. Keefe J.W. Learning style: an overview. In: Keefe J.W. (Ed). Student Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs (1979), NASSP, Reston, VA
25. Kolb D.A. Experiential Learning (1984), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
26. Liu M., and Reed W.M. The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment. Computers in Human Behavior 10 (1994) 419-434
27. Loo R. Kolb's learning style and learning preferences: is there a linkage?. Educational Psychology 24 1 (2004) 98-108
28. Lu J., Yu C.-S., and Liu C. Learning style, learning patterns, and learning performance in a WebCT-based MIS course. Information and Management (2003) 497-507
29. Mabbott A., Bull S., 2004. Alternative views on knowledge: presentation of open learner models. Seventh International Conference of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 689-698.
30. Magoulas G.D., Papanikolaou K.A., and Grigoriadou M. Adaptive web-based learning: accommodating individual differences through system's adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology 34 4 (2003) 511-527
31. McKay E. Exploring the effect of graphical metaphors on the performance of learning computer programming concepts in adult learners: a pilot study. Educational Psychology 19 4 (1999) 471-487
32. Merrill M.D. In: Reigeluth CM. (Ed). Instructional Design Theories and Models: an overview of their Current Status (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Hillsdale, NJ 279-333
33. Mitchell T., Chen S.Y., Macredie R., 2004. Adapting hypermedia to cognitive styles: is it necessary? In: Magoulas G., Chen S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia in AH2004, Part I, Eindhoven, Nederlands, pp. 146-155.
34. Mitrovic, A., Martin, B., 2002. Evaluating the effects of open student models on learning. Proceedings of Apaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 296-305.
35. Papanikolaou, K.A., Grigoriadou, M., 2004. Accommodating learning style characteristics in Adaptive Educational Hypermedia. In: Magoulas G., Chen S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Individual Differences in Adaptive Hypermedia in AH2004, Part I, Eindhoven, Nederlands, pp. 77-86.
36. Papanikolaou, K.A., Grigoriadou, M., 2005. Modelling and externalising learners' interaction behaviour. Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp. 52-61.
37. Papanikolaou K.A., Grigoriadou M., Kornilakis H., and Magoulas G.D. Personalizing the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: the case of INSPIRE. User-Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 13 3 (2003) 213-267
38. Pask G. Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46 (1976) 128-148
39. Pillay H. An investigation of the effect of individual cognitive preferences on learning through computer-based instruction. Educational Psychology 18 2 (1998) 171-182
40. Reed W.M., Oughton J.M., Ayersman D.J., Ervin J.R., and Giessler S.F. Computer experience, learning style & hypermedia navigation. Computers in Human Behavior 16 (2000) 609-628
41. Rich E. Users are individuals: individualizing user models. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 18 (1983) 199-214
42. Riding, R., 1991. Cognitive styles analysis. Learning and Training Technology.
43. Riding R., and Cheema I. Cognitive style-an overview and integration. Educational Psychology 11 3-4 (1991) 193-215
44. Riding R., and Rayner S. Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies (1998), David Fulton Publishers, London
45. Rouet J.-F., and Passerault J.-M. Analysing learner-hypermedia interaction: an overview of on-line methods. Instructional Science 27 (1999) 201-219
46. Rueda, U., Larrañaga, M., Ferrero, B., Arruarte, A., Elorriaga, J.A., 2003. Study of graphical issues in a tool for dynamically visualising student models. Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 268-277.
47. Schmeck, R.R. (Ed.), 1988. Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Plenum Press, New York.
48. Shih, C., Gamon, J.A., 2002. Relationships among learning strategies, patterns, styles and achievement in Webbased courses. Journal of Agricultural Education, 43. Available: http://pubs.aged.tamu.edu/jae/pdf/Vol43/43-04-01.pdf.
49. Soloman, B.A., Felder, R.M., 1999. Index of Learning Styles Questionnaire. Available:http://www.engr.ncsu.edu/learningstyles/ilsweb.htm.
50. Specht M., and Opperman R. ACE-Adaptive courseware environment. The New Review of Hypermeida and Multimedia 4 (1998) 141-161
51. Stern M.K., and Woolf B.P. Adaptive content in an online lecture system. In: Brusilovsky P., Stock O., and Strapparava C. (Eds). Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems, LNCS 1892 (2000) 227-238
52. Triantafillou E., Pomportsis A., and Demetriadis S. The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers and Education 41 (2003) 87-103
53. Weber G., and Brusilovsky P. ELM-ART: an adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction. International Journal of AI in Education 12 4 (2001) 351-384
54. Witkin H.A., Moore C.A., Goodenough D.R., and Cox P.W. Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their implications. Review of Educational Research 47 (1977) 1-64
55. Wolf, C., 2002. iWeaver: Towards an interactive web-based adaptive learning environment to address individual learning styles. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning. Available at: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2002/2HTML/iWeaver.htm.
56. Yu Ting, I., Underwood, J., 1999. Learning styles and the use of the World Wide Web: Case studies from Singapore and the UK. In: Paper presented at the CAL 99. 'Virtuality in Education', London.
57. Zapata-Rivera J.-D., and Greer J.E. Interacting with inspectable bayesian student models. International Journal of AI in Education 14 2 (2004) 127-163