On the undesirability of commodity taxation even when income taxation is not optimal

Journal of Public Economics

Volumn 90, Issue 6-7, 2006, Pages 1235-1250

  Kaplow, Louis ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Atkinson Stiglitz; Commodity taxation; Income taxation; Indirect taxation; Optimal taxation; Ramsey taxation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646260206     PISSN: 00472727     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Atkinson A.B., and Stiglitz J.E. The design of tax structure: Direct versus indirect taxation. Journal of Public Economics 6 (1976) 55-75
2. Atkinson A.B., and Stiglitz J.E. Lectures on Public Economics (1980), McGraw-Hill, New York
3. Boadway R., and Pestieau P. Indirect taxation and redistribution: The scope of the Atkinson-Stiglitz theorem. In: Arnott R., Greenwald B., Kanbur R., and Nalebuff B. (Eds). Economics for an Imperfect World: Essays in Honor of Joseph E. Stiglitz (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 387-403
4. Christiansen V. Which commodity taxes should supplement the income tax?. Journal of Public Economics 24 (1984) 195-220
5. Cremer H., Pestieau P., and Rochet J.-C. Direct versus indirect taxation: The design of the tax structure revisited. International Economic Review 42 (2001) 781-799
6. Deaton A. Optimally uniform commodity taxes. Economics Letters 2 (1979) 357-361
7. Hylland A., and Zeckhauser R. Distributional objectives should affect taxes but not program choice or design. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 81 (1979) 264-284
8. Kaplow L. The optimal supply of public goods and the distortionary cost of taxation. National Tax Journal 49 (1996) 513-533
9. Kaplow L. On the (ir)relevance of distribution and labor supply distortion to government policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18:4 (2004) 159-175
10. Kaplow, L., 2005. Optimal control of externalities in the presence of income taxation. Working paper.
11. Konishi H. A Pareto-improving commodity tax reform under a smooth nonlinear income tax. Journal of Public Economics 56 (1995) 413-446
12. Laroque G. Indirect taxation is harmful under separability and taste homogeneity: A simple proof. Economics Letters 87 (2005) 141-144
13. Marchand M., Pestieau P., and Racionero M. Optimal redistribution when different workers are indistinguishable. Canadian Journal of Economics 36 (2003) 911-922
14. Mirrlees J.A. Optimal tax theory: A synthesis. Journal of Public Economics 6 (1976) 327-358
15. Naito H. Re-examination of uniform commodity taxes under a non-linear income tax system and its implication for production efficiency. Journal of Public Economics 71 (1999) 165-188
16. Ordover J.A., and Phelps E.S. The concept of optimal taxation in the overlapping-generations model of capital and wealth. Journal of Public Economics 12 (1979) 1-26
17. Ramsey F.P. A contribution to the theory of taxation. Economic Journal 37 (1927) 47-61
18. Saez E. The desirability of commodity taxation under non-linear income taxation and heterogeneous tastes. Journal of Public Economics 83 (2002) 217-230
19. Saez E. Direct or indirect tax instruments for redistribution: Short-run versus long-run. Journal of Public Economics 88 (2004) 503-518
20. Stiglitz J.E. Pareto efficient and optimal taxation and the new new welfare economics. In: Auerbach A.J., and Feldstein M. (Eds). Handbook of Public Economics vol. 2 (1987), North-Holland, Amsterdam 991-1042
21. Yang C.C., and Haller H. On directions of commodity tax reform in the presence of a given non-linear income tax schedule. Canadian Journal of Economics 26 (1993) 469-480