Minimally invasive reoperative isolated valve surgery: Early and mid-term results

Journal of Cardiac Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 240-244

  Sharony, Ram ^a   Grossi, Eugene A ^a,b   Saunders, Paul C ^a   Schwartz, Charles F ^a   Ursomanno, Patricia ^a   Ribakove, Greg H ^a   Galloway, Aubrey C ^a   Colvin, Steven B ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CLAMP; CANNULA; CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; FEMALE; HEART EJECTION FRACTION; HEART VALVE SURGERY; HUMAN; KIDNEY DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OPERATION DURATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; RISK REDUCTION; STERNOTOMY; STROKE; SURGICAL APPROACH; THORACOTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646257333     PISSN: 08860440     EISSN: 15408191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8191.2006.00271.x     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Follis FM Pett SB Jr. Miller KB et al Catastrophic hemorrhage on sternal reentry: Still a dreaded complication? Ann Thorac Surg 1999 68 2215 2219
2. Biglioli P Di Matteo S Parolari A et al Reoperative cardiac valve surgery: A multivariable analysis of risk factors Cardiovasc Surg 1994 2 216 222
3. Jamieson WR Dryden PJ O'Connor JP et al Beneficial effect of both tranexamic acid and aprotinin on blood loss reduction in reoperative valve replacement surgery Circulation 1997 96 II-96 100
4. Bortolotti U Milano A Mossuto E et al Early and late outcome after reoperation for prosthetic valve dysfunction: Analysis of 549 patients during a 26-year period J Heart Valve Dis 1994 3 81 87
5. Piehler JM Blackstone EH Bailey KR et al Reoperation on prosthetic heart values. Patient-specific estimates of in-hospital events J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995 109 30 48
6. Borger MA Yau TM Rao V et al Reoperative mitral valve replacement: Importance of preservation of the subvalvular apparatus Ann Thorac Surg 2002 74 1482 1487
7. Liu J Sidiropoulos A Konertz W Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999 16 Suppl 2 S80 S83
8. Machler HE Bergmann P Anelli-Monti M et al Minimally invasive versus conventional aortic valve operations: A prospective study in 120 patients Ann Thorac Surg 1999 67 1001 1005
9. Byrne JG Aranki SF Couper GS et al Reoperative aortic valve replacement: Partial upper hemisternotomy versus conventional full sternotomy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999 118 991 997
10. Burfeind WR Glower DD Davis RD et al Mitral surgery after prior cardiac operation: Port-access versus sternotomy or thoracotomy Ann Thorac Surg 2002 74 S1323 S1325
11. Cohn LH Minimally invasive valve surgery J Card Surg 2001 16 260 265
12. Bonacchi M Prifti E Giunti G et al Does ministernotomy improve postoperative outcome in aortic valve operation? A prospective randomized study Ann Thorac Surg 2002 73 460 465
13. Grossi EA Zakow PK Ribakove G et al Comparison of post-operative pain, stress response, and quality of life in port access vs. standard sternotomy coronary bypass patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999 16 Suppl 2 S39 S42
14. Chang YS Lin PJ Chang CH et al "I" ministernotomy for aortic valve replacement Ann Thorac Surg 1999 68 40 45
15. Colvin SB Galloway AC Ribakove G et al Port-Access mitral valve surgery: Summary of results J Card Surg 1998 13 286 289
16. Applebaum RM Cutler WM Bhardwaj N et al Utility of transesophageal echocardiography during port-access minimally invasive cardiac surgery Am J Cardiol 1998 82 183 188
17. Kort S Applebaum RM Grossi EA et al Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: Echocardiographic and clinical results Am Heart J 2001 142 476 481
18. Spencer FC Galloway AC Grossi EA et al Recent developments and evolving techniques of mitral valve reconstruction Ann Thorac Surg 1998 65 307 313
19. Cohn LH Aranki SF Rizzo RJ et al Decrease in operative risk of reoperative valve surgery Ann Thorac Surg 1993 56 15 20
20. Odell JA Mullany CJ Schaff HV et al Aortic valve replacement after previous coronary artery bypass grafting Ann Thorac Surg 1996 62 1424 1430
21. Vogt PR Brunner-LaRocca H Sidler P et al Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: Predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2000 17 134 139
22. Akins CW Buckley MJ Daggett WM et al Risk of reoperative valve replacement for failed mitral and aortic bioprostheses Ann Thorac Surg 1998 65 1545 1551
23. Onnasch JF Schneider F Falk V et al Minimally invasive approach for redo mitral valve surgery: A true benefit for the patient J Card Surg 2002 17 14 19
24. Grossi EA LaPietra A Ribakove GH et al Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: Comparison of intermediate-term results J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001 121 708 713
25. Grossi EA Galloway AC LaPietra A et al Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: A 6-year experience with 714 patients Ann Thorac Surg 2002 74 660 663