Analysis of depth-dependent pressure head of slug tests in highly permeable aquifers

Ground Water

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 472-477

  Chen, Chia Shyun ^a   Wu, Ching Rung ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DATA REDUCTION; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; OSCILLATIONS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; TRANSDUCERS;

CURVE-MATCHING METHOD; DEPTH-DEPENDENT PRESSURE; PRESSURE HEAD;

AQUIFERS;

FRESH WATER;

AQUIFER; HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY; NUMERICAL METHOD; PERMEABILITY; WATER COLUMN; WATER DEMAND; WATER LEVEL;

ARTICLE; PRESSURE;

FRESH WATER; PRESSURE;

EID: 33646254876     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00152.x     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bouwer H and RC Rice 1976 A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells Water Resources Research 12 no 3 423 428
2. Butler JJ 2002 A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells Ground Water 40 no 3 303 307
3. Butler JJ Jr. 1998 The Design, Performance, and Analysis of Slug Tests Boca Raton, Florida Lewis Publishers
4. Butler JJ Jr.. EJ Garnett and JM Healey 2003 Analysis of slug tests in formations of high hydraulic conductivity Ground Water 41 no 5 620 630
5. Butler JJ Jr. and X Zhan 2004 Hydraulic tests in highly permeable aquifers Water Resources Research 40 W12402, doi: 10.1029/2003WR002998
6. Cooper HH Jr.. JD Bredehoeft IS Papadopulos and RR Bennett 1965 The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves Journal of Geophysical Research 70 no 16 3915 3926
7. Hvorslev MJ 1951 Time lag and soil permeability in ground-water observations MS Bulletin 36 Vicksburg, Mississippi Waterway Experimentation Station, Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army
8. Kabala ZJ GF Pinder and PCD Milly 1985 Analysis of well-aquifer response to a slug test Water Resources Research 21 no 9 1433 1436
9. Kipp KL Jr. 1985 Theoretical curve analysis of inertial effects in the response of a well to a slug test Water Resources Research 21 no 9 1397 1408
10. McElwee CD and MA Zenner 1998 A nonlinear model for analysis of slug test data Water Resources Research 34 no 1 55 66
11. Springer RK and LW Gelhar 1991 Characterization of large-scale aquifer heterogeneity in glacial outwash by analysis of slug tests with oscillatory response USGS Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4034 Cape Cod, Massachusetts USGS
12. Van der Kamp G 1976 Determining aquifer transmissivity by means of well response tests: The underdamped case Water Resources Research 12 no 1 71 77
13. Wylie CR and LC Barrett 1982 Advanced Engineering Mathematics 5th ed McGraw-Hill Inc New York
14. Zlotnik VA and VL McGuire 1998 Multi-level slug tests in highly permeable formations, 1. Modification of the Springer-Gelhar (SG) model Journal of Hydrology 204 271 282
15. Zurbuchen BR VA Zlotnik and JJ Butler Jr. 2002 Dynamic interpretation of slug test in highly permeable aquifers Water Resources Research 38 no 3 doi: 10.1029/2001WR000354