Emphasis on the need for guidelines for documentation of search strategy and results was needed, criticism of a Cochrane review was not [3]

Journal of the Medical Library Association

Volumn 92, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 393-394

  Santesso, Nancy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COCHRANE LIBRARY; DOCUMENTATION; LETTER; LIBRARIAN; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIBRARY; META ANALYSIS; NOTE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; LIBRARY SERVICES; META-ANALYSIS; PEER REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33646252243     PISSN: 15365050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. WELLER AC. Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports [comment and opinion]. J Med Libr Assoc 2004 Apr;92(2):163-4.
2. PATRICK TB, DEMIRIS G, FOLK LC, MOXLEY DE, MITCHELL JA, TAO D. Evidence-based retrieval in evidence-based medicine. J Med Libr Assoc 2004 Apr;92(2):196-9.
3. JEFFERSON TO, ALDERSON P, DAVIDOFF F, WAGER E. Editorial peer-review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (Cochrane methodology review). In: The Cochrane Library( 1). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.
4. MIDDLETON P. Personal communication. [29 May 2004].
5. AASERUD M, DAHLGREN AT, STURM H, KÖSTERS JP, HILL S, FURBERG CD, GRILLI R, HENRY DA, OXMAN AD, RAMSAY C, ROSS-DEGNAN D, SOUMERAI SB. Pharmaceutical policies: effects on rational drug use (protocol for a Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library( 1). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2004.