I'll Take Mine Neat: Multiple Methods but a Single Methodology

Evaluation

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 249-258

  Kushner, Saville ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646252203     PISSN: 13563890     EISSN: 14617153     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1358902002008002521     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Cook, T. (1997) `Lessons Learned in Evaluation over the Past 25 Years', in E. Chelimsky and W. R. Shadish (eds) Evaluation for the 21st Century: a Handbook, pp. 30-52. London: Sage.
2. Greene, J. (2001) `The Relational and Dialogic Dimensions of Program Quality', in A. P. Benson, D. M. Hinn and C. Lloyd (eds) Visions of Quality: How Evaluators Define, Understand and Represent Program Quality, Advances in Program Evaluation7, pp. 57-72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3. Greene, J., L. Benjamin and L. Goodyear (2001) `The Merits of Mixing Methods in Evaluation', Evaluation7(1): 25-44.
4. House, E. and K. Howe (1999) Values in Evaluation and Social Research. London: Sage.
5. Kushner, S. (2000) Personalising Evaluation. London: Sage.
6. MacDonald, B. (1987) `Evaluation and the Control of Education', in R. Murphy and H. Torrance (eds) Issues and Methods in Evaluation, pp. 36-48. London: Paul Chapman.
7. MacDonald, B. and S. Kushner (1982) Bread and Dreams: a Case Study of Bilingual Education in the USA, CARE Occasional Publications No. 12. Norwich: University of East Anglia.
8. Scriven, M. (1996) `The Theory behind Practical Evaluation', Evaluation2(4): 393-404.
9. Sirotnik, K. (ed.) (1990) Evaluation and Social Justice: Issues in Public Education, New Directions for Programme Evaluation 45. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.