A Multilevel Analysis of Neighbourhood Contextual Effects on Serious Juvenile Offending: The Role of Subcultural Values and Social Disorganization

European Journal of Criminology

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 201-235

  Oberwittler, Dietrich ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR FOREIGN AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW   (Germany)

Author keywords

Ecology; Juvenile Delinquency; Multilevel Analysis; Neighbourhood Contextual Effects; Social Disorganization; Subculture

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646249112     PISSN: 14773708     EISSN: 17412609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1477370804041248     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Anderson, A. L. (2002). Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: The role of the single-parent family. Journal of Criminal Justice 30, 575-587.
2. Bellair, P. E. (2000). Informal surveillance and street crime: A complex relationship. Criminology 38, 137-169.
3. Bottoms, A. E. and Wiles, P. (1997). Environmental criminology. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds) The Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Browne, W. J., Goldstein, H. and Rasbash, J. (2001). Multiple membership multiple classification (MMMC) models. Statistical Modelling 1, 103-124.
6. Browne, W. J., Subramanian, S. V., Jones, K. and Goldstein, H. (2002). Variance partitioning in multilevel logistic models that exhibit over-dispersion. Unpublished paper, available at http://www.maths.nott.ac.uk/personal/pmzwjb/materials/billcorr1.pdf, accessed 8 September 2003.
7. Bryk, A. S. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Bursik, R. J., Jr (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology 26, 519-552.
9. Bursik, R. J., Jr (2001). The unfolding of criminal events within neighborhood contexts. In R. F. Meier, L. W. Kennedy and V. F. Sacco (eds) The process and structure of crime. Criminal events and crime analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
10. Cheong, Y. F. and Raudenbush, S. W. (2000). Measurement and structural models for children's problem behaviors. Psychological Methods 5, 477-495.
11. Cloward, R. A. and Ohlin, L. E. (1960). Delinquency and opportunity. Illinois: Free Press of Glencoe.
12. Cohen, L. E. and Land, K. (1984). Discrepancies between crime reports and crime surveys: Urban and structural determinants. Criminology 22, 499-530.
13. Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94, 95-120.
14. Dahlbäck, O. (1996). Urban place of residence and individual criminality. British Journal of Criminology 36, 529-545.
15. Duncan, G. J. and Brooks-Gunn, J., eds (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Duncan, G. J. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Assessing the effect of context in studies of child and youth development. Educational Psychologist 34, 29-41.
17. Eisner, M. (1997). Das Ende der zivilisierten Stadt? Die Auswirkungen von Modernisierung und urbaner Krise auf Gewaltdelinquenz. Frankfurt: Campus.
18. Eisner, M. and Wikström, P.-O. (1999). Violent crime in the urban community: A comparison of Stockholm and Basel. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 7, 427-442.
19. Elliott, D. S. and Huizinga, D. (1989). Improving self-reported measures of delinquency. In M. W. Klein (ed.) Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency, (NATO ASI Series D: Behavioural and Social Sciences, vol. 50), 155-186. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
20. Elliott, D. S., Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A. and Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 33, 389-426.
21. Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K. and Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development 74, 205-220.
22. Felson, R. B., Liska, A. E., South, S. J. and McNulty, T. L. (1994). The subculture of violence and delinquency: Individual vs. school context effects. Social Forces 73, 155-173.
23. Furstenberg, F. and Hughes, M. E. (1995). Social capital and successful development among at-risk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family 57.
24. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360-1380.
25. Guo, G. and Zhao, H. (2000). Multilevel modeling for binary data. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 441-462.
26. Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? American Journal of Sociology 106, 1013-1057.
27. Howe, C.-W., Karstedt-Henke, S. and Wolterhoff, J. (1991). Wie dunkel ist das Dunkelfeld? Die Validität selbstberichteter Delinquenzangaben bei Jugendlichen. Unpublished manuscript, Universität Bielefeld.
28. Junger-Tas, J. and Marshall, I. H. (1999). The self-report methodology in crime research. In M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and justice. A review of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Karstedt-Henke, S. and Crasm öller, B. (1991). Risks of being detected, chances of getting away. In J. Junger-Tas, L. Boendermaker and P. van der Laan (eds) The future of the juvenile justice system. Leuwen: Acco.
30. Kim, Y. S. (2001). The effects of individual, neighborhood, and school characteristics on delinquency: A multi-level cross-nested analysis. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University.
31. Klein, M. W. (1984). Offence specialisation and versatility among juveniles. British Journal of Criminology 24, 185-194.
32. Köllisch, T. and Oberwittler, D. (submitted). Wie ehrlich berichten Jugendlicheüber ihr delinquentes Verhalten? Ergebnisse einer externen Validierung auf individueller und Aggregatebene. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie.
33. Leventhal, T. and Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin 126, 309-337.
34. Liska, E. and Warner, B. (1991). Functions of crime: A paradoxical process. American Journal of Sociology 91, 1441-1463.
35. Loeber, R. and Stouthammer-Loeber, M. (1986). Family factors as correlates and predictors of juvenile conduct problems and delinquency. In M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds) Crime and justice, vol. 7. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J. and Hirschfield, P. (2001). Urban poverty and juvenile crime. Evidence from a randomized housing-mobility experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 655-680.
37. Matsueda, R. L. and Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology 36, 269-308.
38. Morenoff, J., Sampson, R. J. and Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology 39, 517-559.
39. Oberwittler, D. (2002). Ecological context effects on juvenile offending - Conditional impacts of neighborhoods and schools. Working Paper No. 6 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute.
40. Oberwittler, D. (2003a). Das stadtviertel-und gemeindebezogene Stichprobendesign. Anlage und empirische Ergebnisse. Working Paper No. 9 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute.
41. Oberwittler, D. (2003b). Die Messung und Qualitätskontrolle kontextbezogener Befragungsdaten mithilfe der Mehrebenenanalyse - am Beispiel des Sozialkapitals von Stadtvierteln. ZA-Information 53, 11-41.
42. Oberwittler, D. (in preparation). Which context? An integrated multilevel analysis of neighborhoods and schools as ecological contexts of juvenile delinquency.
43. Oberwittler, D. and Blank, T. (2003). Methodenbericht MPI-Schulbefragung 1999. Technical Report No. 1 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute.
44. Oberwittler, D. and Naplava, T. (2002a). Auswirkungen des Erhebungsverfahrens bei Jugendbefragungen zu ‘heiklen’ Themen - schulbasierte schriftliche Befragung und haushaltsbasierte mündliche Befragung im Vergleich. ZUMANachrichten 51, 49-77.
45. Oberwittler, D. and Naplava, T. (2002b). Methodenbericht postalische Bewohnerbefragung. Technical Report No. 3 of the ‘Social Problems and Juvenile Delinquency in Ecological Perspective’ project. Freiburg: Max Planck Institute.
46. Oberwittler, D., Köllisch, T. and Würger, M. (2002). Selbstberichtete Delinquenz bei Jugendlichen. In A. Glöckner-Rist (ed.) ZUMA-Informationssystem. Elektronisches Handbuch sozialwissenschaftlicher Erhebungsinstrumente Version 6.0. Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.
47. Osgood, D. W. and Anderson, A. L. (2000). Routine activities and social disorganization: Explaining schools’ rates of delinquency. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Society of Criminology.
48. Osgood, D. W., Wilson, J. K., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G. and Johnston, L. D. (1996). Routine activities and individual delinquent behavior. American Sociological Review 61, 635-655.
49. Ouimet, M. (2000). Aggregation bias in ecological research: How social disorganization and criminal opportunities shape the spatial distribution of juvenile delinquency in Montreal. Canadian Journal of Criminology 42, 135-156.
50. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology 24, 1-24.
51. Raudenbush, S. W. and Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods, 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52. Raudenbush, S. W. and Sampson, R. J. (1999). Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with appliance to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology 29, 1-41.
53. Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A. and Congdon, R. (2001). HLM. Hierarchical-linear and non-linear modeling. Program Version 5.
54. Rood-Pijpers, E., Rovers, B., van Gemert, F. and Fijnaut, C. (1995). Preventje van jeugdcriminaliteit in een grote stad. Rotterdam: Sanders Instituut.
55. Sampson, R. J. (2000). How do communities undergird or undermine human development? Relevant contexts and social mechanisms. In A. Booth and N. Crouter (eds) Does it take a village? Community effects on children, adolescents, and families. Mawhaw, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Sampson, R. J. and Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime. Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology 94, 774-831.
57. Sampson, R. J. and Raudenbush, S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology 105, 603-651.
58. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D. and Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review 64: 633-660.
59. Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D. and Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processes and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology 28, 443-478.
60. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W. and Earls, F. J. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277, 918-924.
61. Shaw, C. and McKay, H. D. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
62. Simcha-Fagan, O. and Schwartz, J. E. (1986). Neighborhood and delinquency: An assessment of contextual effects. Criminology 24, 667-704.
63. Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline. Crime and the spiral of decay in American neighborhoods. New York: Free Press.
64. Smith, D. J., McVie, S., Woodward, R., Shute, J., Flint, J. and McAra, L. (2001). The Edinburgh study of youth transitions and crime: Key findings at ages 12 and 13. Edinburgh: Centre of Law and Society.
65. Snijders, T. and Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel analysis. London: Sage.
66. Thornberry, T. P. (1996). Empirical support for interactional theory: A review of the literature. In J. D. Hawkins (ed.) Delinquency and crime. Current theories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Timberlake, J. M. (2002). Racial and ethnic inequality in childhood exposure to neighborhood poverty and affluence. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America. Chicago: University of Chicago.
68. Wegener, B. (1988). Kritik des Prestiges. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
69. Welsh, W., Greene, J. and Jenkins, P. (1999). School disorder: The influence of individual, institutional, and community factors. Criminology 37, 73-115.
70. Wikström, P.-O. H. (1991). Urban crime, criminals, and victims. New York: Springer.
71. Wikström, P.-O. H. (1998). Communities and crime. In M. Tonry (ed.) Oxford handbook on crime and punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72. Wikström, P.-O. H. (2002). Adolescent crime in context. Report to the Home Office. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.
73. Wikström, P.-O. H. and Sampson, R. J. (2003). Social mechanisms of community influences on crime and pathways in criminality. In B. Lahey, T. E. Moffitt and A. Caspi (eds) The causes of conduct disorder and serious juvenile delinquency. New York: Guilford Press.
74. Wilson, William J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.