Fake sun tan diagnosis of porokeratosis [6]

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 224-226

  Katugampola, Ruwanik P ^a   Finlay, A Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; SUNSCREEN;

ACTINIC POROKERATOSIS; ADULT; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL FEATURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE DURATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LETTER; LOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN BIOPSY; SKIN MANIFESTATION; SUNBURN; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; INTRADERMAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POROKERATOSIS;

ADMINISTRATION, CUTANEOUS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POROKERATOSIS; SUNSCREENING AGENTS;

EID: 33646245674     PISSN: 09269959     EISSN: 14683083     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01381.x     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Delfino M, Argenziano G, Nino M. Dermoscopy for the diagnosis of porokeratosis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004; 18: 194-195.
2. Redondo P, Sola MA, Lloret P. Porokeratosis and povidone-iodine: A new clinical diagnostic sign. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147: 383.
3. D'Amico D, Vaccaro M, Guarneri C et al. Videodermatoscopic approach to porokeratosis of Mibelli: A useful tool for the diagnosis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 2001; 81: 431-432.