The Effect of Chiropractic Adjustments on Movement Time: A Pilot Study Using Fitts Law

Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 257-266

  Smith, Dean L ^a   Dainoff, Marvin J ^b   Smith, Jane P ^a  

^a Essence of Wellness Chiropractic Center   (United States)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Chiropractic; Fitts Law; Manipulation; Motor Control; Motor Skills

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHIROPRACTIC; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PATIENT SELECTION; SPINE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STUDENT T TEST; SUBLUXATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MALE; MANIPULATION, CHIROPRACTIC; MATHEMATICS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33646241748     PISSN: 01614754     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Reeves N., Cholewicki J., and Milner T. Muscle reflex classification of low-back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 15 (2005) 53-60
2. Davis K., and Seol H. Injury-induced kinematic compensations within the lower back: impact of non-lower back injuries. Ergonomics 48 (2005) 135-149
3. Burnett A., Cornelius M., Dankaerts W., and O'Sullivan P. Spinal kinematics and trunk muscle activity in cyclists: a comparison between healthy controls and non-specific chronic low back pain subjects-a pilot investigation. Man Ther 9 (2004) 211-219
4. Ferguson S., Marras W., Burr D., Davis K., and Gupta P. Differences in motor recruitment and resulting kinematics between low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants during lifting exertions. Clin Biomech 19 (2004) 992-999
5. Moseley G., Nicholas M., and Hodges P. Does anticipation of back pain predispose to back trouble?. Brain 127 (2004) 2339-2347
6. Lehman G. Biomechanical assessments of lumbar spinal function. How low back pain sufferers differ from normals. Implications for outcome measures research. Part I: kinematic assessments of lumbar function. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27 (2004) 57-62
7. van Dieen J., Selen L., and Cholewicki J. Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13 (2003) 333-351
8. Hawk C., Long C., Reiter R., Davis S., CJ A., and Evans R. Issues in planning a placebo-controlled trial of manual methods: results of a pilot study. J Altern Complement Med 8 (2002) 21-32
9. Shambaugh P. Changes in electrical activity in muscles resulting from chiropractic adjustment: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 10 (1987) 300-304
10. Smith D., and Cox R. Muscular strength and chiropractic: theoretical mechanisms and health implications. J Vertebral Sublux Res 3 (1999-2000) 1-13
11. Kelly D., Murphy B., and Backhouse D. Use of a mental rotation reaction time paradigm to measure the effects of upper cervical adjustments on cortical processing: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 23 (2000) 246-251
12. Pickar J. Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation. Spine J 2 (2002) 357-371
13. Dishman J., Ball K., and Burke J. Central motor excitability changes after spinal manipulation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 25 (2002) 1-9
14. Dishman J., and Bulbulian R. Comparison of effects of spinal manipulation and massage on motoneuron excitability. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 41 (2001) 97-106
15. Lehman G., and McGill S. The influence of a chiropractic manipulation on lumbar kinematics and electromyography during simple and complex tasks: a case study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22 (1999) 576-581
16. Lehman G., and McGill S. Spinal manipulation causes variable spine kinematic and trunk muscle electromyographic responses. Clin Biomech 16 (2001) 293-299
17. Smith DL. Postural dynamics following chiropractic adjustment: preliminary findings. In: Smart LJ, editor. International Society for Ecological Psychology. Oxford (OH): Miami University; p.3.
18. Murphy B., Dawson N., and Slack J. Sacroiliac joint manipulation decreases the H-reflex. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 35 (1995) 87-94
19. Cramer G., Gregorson D., Knudsen J., Hubbard B., Ustas L., and Cantu J. The effects of side-posture positioning and adjusting on the lumbar z joints: a randomized controlled trial with sixty-four subjects. Spine 27 (2002) 2459-2466
20. Herzog W. The mechanical, neuromuscular, and physiologic effects produced by spinal manipulation. In: Herzog W. (Ed). Clinical biomechanics of spinal manipulation (2000), Churchill Livingstone, New York 191-207
21. Fitts P. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47 (1954) 381-391
22. MacKenzie I. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum-Comput Interact 7 (1992) 91-139
23. Shumway-Cook A., and Woollacott M. Motor control: theory and applications (2001), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
24. Schmidt R., and Lee T. Motor control and learning a behavioral emphasis (2005), Human Kinetics, Champaign (Ill)
25. Soukoreff R., and MacKenzie I. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts' law research in HCI. Int J Human-Comput Stud 61 (2004) 751-789
26. Suter E., McMorland G., Herzog W., and Bray R. Conservative lower back treatment reduces inhibition in knee extensor muscles: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 23 (2000) 76-80
27. Suter E., and McMorland G. Decrease in elbow flexor inhibition after cervical spine manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain. Clin Biomech 17 (2002) 541-544
28. Suter E., McMorland G., Herzog W., and Bray R. Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint manipulation in patients with anterior knee pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 22 (1999) 149-153
29. Gatterman M. Foundations of chiropractic: subluxation (1995), Mosby, St. Louis (Mo)
30. Leach R. The chiropractic theories: a textbook of scientific research. 4th ed. (2004), Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore (Md)
31. Peterson D., and Bergmann T. Chiropractic technique: principles and procedures. 2nd ed. (2002), Mosby, St. Louis (Mo)
32. Christensen M., and Kollasch M. Job analysis of chiropractic (2005), National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Greeley (Colo)
33. Soukereff R., and MacKenzie I. Generalized Fitts' Law model builder version 1.1. Guelph (Ontario, Canada): the authors. C. [software on the internet] (1995). ftp://snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca/pub/fitts-law/gflmb [cited 2000 Jun 14]. Available from
34. Soukoreff R., and MacKenzie I. Generalized Fitts' Law model builder. In: Katz I., Mack R., Marks L., Rosson M., and Nielsen J. (Eds). Companion proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems-CHI'95 (1995), ACM, New York 113-114
35. Vicente K., and Torenvliet G. The earth is spherical (P < .05): alternative methods of statistical inference. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 1 (2000) 248-271
36. Schmidt R., and Wrisberg C. Motor learning and performance: a problem based learning approach. 3rd ed. (2004), Human Kinetics, Champaign (Ill)
37. Behm D., Bambury A., Cahill F., and Power K. Effect of acute static stretching on force, balance, reaction time, and movement time. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36 (2004) 1397-1402
38. Zappia M., Montesanti R., Colao R., and Quattrone A. Usefulness of movement time in the assessment of Parkinson's disease. J Neurol 241 (1994) 543-550
39. Jankovic J., Ben-Arie L., Schwartz K., Chen K., Khan M., Lai E., et al. Movement and reaction times and fine coordination tasks following pallidotomy. Mov Disord 14 (1999) 57-62
40. Haas M., Groupp E., Aickin M., Fairweather A., Ganger B., Attwood M., et al. Dose response for chiropractic care of chronic cervicogenic headache and associated neck pain: a randomized pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27 (2004) 547-553
41. Haas M., Groupp E., and Kraemer D. Dose-response for chiropractic care of chronic low back pain. Spine J 4 (2004) 574-583
42. Descarreaux M., Blouin J., Drolet M., Papadimitriou S., and Teasdale N. Efficacy of preventive spinal manipulation for chronic low-back pain and related disabilities: a preliminary study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 27 (2004) 509-514
43. Santrock J. Psychology. Updated 7th ed. (2005), McGraw Hill, Boston
44. Smart L., and Smith D. Postural dynamics: clinical and empirical implications. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 24 (2001) 340-349
45. Bonci A., and Ratliff R. Strength modulation of the biceps brachii muscles immediately following a single manipulation of the C4/5 intervertebral motor unit in healthy subjects: preliminary report. Am J Chiropr Med 3 (1990) 14-18
46. Rogers R. The effects of spinal manipulation on cervical kinesthesia in patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 20 (1997) 80-85
47. Enebo B. The effect of cervical spine manipulation on motor control in healthy individuals: a pilot study. Chiropr J Aust 33 (2003) 93-97
48. Wells M., Gaintinoto S., D'Agate D., Areman B., Fazzini E., Dowling D., et al. Standard osteopathic treatment acutely improves gait performance in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Am Osteopath Assoc 99 (1999) 92-98
49. Noll D., Shores J., Bryman P., and Masterson E. Adjunctive osteopathic manipulative treatment in the elderly hospitalized with pneumonia: a pilot study. J Am Osteopath Assoc 99 (1999) 143-152