A domain model for dynamic system reconfiguration

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3713 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 553-567

  Walsh, D'Arcy ^a   Bordeleau, Francis ^a   Selic, Bran ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

ALLOY LANGUAGE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DOMAIN MODEL; DYNAMIC SYSTEM RECONFIGURATION; METHODOLOGY;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

EID: 33646202778     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11557432_42     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Jarke, M., Meta models for requirements engineering. 1996.
2. Jarke, M., Requirements Tracing (Introduction). Communications of the ACM, 1998. 41(12): p. 32-36.
3. Georgiadis, I., J. Magee, and J. Kramer. Self-Organising Software Architectures for Distributed Systems, in ACM WOSS '02. 2002. Charleston, SC: ACM.
4. Oreizy, P., Issues in Modeling and Analyzing Dynamic Software Architectures. 1999, Information and Computer Science, University of California, Irvine: Irvine, California.
5. Oreizy, P., N. Medvidovic, and R.N. Taylor. Architecture-Based Runtime Software Evolution, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering. 1998.
6. Szyperski, C., Component Software: Beyond Object-Oriented Programming Second Edition. Component Software Series. 2002, New York, N. Y.: Addison-Wesley.
7. Deployment-and-Configuration-Draft-Adopted-Specification, Deployment and Configuration Draft Adopted Specification. 2003, OMG: Needham, MA.
8. Oreizy, P., et al., An Architecture-Based Approach to Self-Adaptive Software. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 1999: p. 54-62.
9. Appavoo, J., et al., Enabling automatic behavior in systems software with hot swapping. IBM Systems Journal, 2003. 42(1): p. 60-76.
10. Lopes, A., M. Wermelinger, and J.L. Fiadeiro, Higher-Order Architectural Connectors. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2003.12(1): p. 64-104.
11. Whisnant, K., Z.T. Kalbarczyk, and R.K. Iyer, A system model for dynamically reconfigurable software. IBM Systems Journal, 2003. 42(1):p. 45-59.
12. Czarnecki, K. and U.W. Eisennecker, Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. 2000, New York, N.Y.: Addison-Wesley.
13. Gomaa, H., Designing Software Product Lines with UML From Use Cases to Pattern-Based Software Architectures. Object Technology Series, ed. G. Booch, I. Jacobson, and J. Rumbaugh. 2004, New York, N.Y.: Addison-Wesley.
14. Jackson, D., I. Schechter, and I. Shlyakhter, Alcoa: The Alloy Constraint Analyzer. 1999, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts.
15. Jackson, D., Alloy: A Lightweight Object Modelling Notation. 2001, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 32.
16. Jackson, D., Micromodels of Software: Ligthweight Modelling and Analysis with Alloy. 2002, MIT Lab for Computer Science: Cambridge, Mass. p. 1-58.
17. Vaziri, M. and D. Jackson, Some Shortcomings of OCL, the Object Constriant Language of UML. 1999, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science: Cambridge, Mass. p. 1-17.
18. Marriott, K. and P.J. Stuckey, Programming with Constraints An Introduction. 1998, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
19. Duffy, D.J., Domain Architectures Models and Architectures for UML Applications. 2004, Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley and Sons.
20. Fowler, M., UML Distilled Third Edition A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. Object Technology Series. 2004: Addison-Wesley.
21. Warmer, J. and A. Kleppe, The Object Constraint Language Second Edition Getting Your Models Ready for MDA. Object Technology Series. 2003, New York, N.Y.: Addison-Wesley.
22. Walsh, D., Ph.D. Work in Progress, in School of Computer Science, Carleton University. 2005, Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Computer Science: Ottawa, Canada.
23. Medvidovic, N. and R.N. Taylor, A Classification and Comparison Framework for Software Architecture Description Languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 2000. 26(1): p. 70-93.