Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 129, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 641-648

  Del Santo Jr , Marinho ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; FACE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SKULL BASE; STATISTICS; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL OCCLUSION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SKULL BASE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646202157     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.025     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Taylor C.M. Changes in the relationship of nasion, point A and point B and the effect upon ANB. Am J Orthod 56 (1969) 143-163
2. Beatty E.J. A modified technique for evaluating apical base relationships. Am J Orthod 68 (1975) 303-315
3. Jacobson A. The "Wits" appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 67 (1975) 125-138
4. Jacobson A. Application of "Wits" appraisal. Am J Orthod 70 (1976) 179-189
5. Jacobson A. Update on the "Wits" appraisal. Angle Orthod 58 (1988) 205-219
6. Ferrazzini G. Critical evaluation of the ANB angle. Am J Orthod 69 (1976) 620-626
7. Kim Y.H., and Vietas J.J. Anteroposterior dysplasia indicator. an adjunct to cephalometric differential diagnosis. Am J Orthod 73 (1978) 619-633
8. Brown M. Eight methods of analyzing a cephalogram to establish anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy. Br J Orthod 8 (1981) 139-146
9. Freeman R.S. Adjusting A-N-B angles to reflect the effect of maxillary position. Angle Orthod 51 (1981) 162-171
10. Hussels W., and Nanda R.S. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod 85 (1984) 411-423
11. Chang H. Asessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92 (1987) 117-122
12. Hussels W., and Nanda R.S. Clinical application of a method to correct angle ANB for geometric effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 92 (1987) 506-510
13. Riedel R.A. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 22 (1952) 142-145
14. Steiner C.C. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 39 (1953) 729-755
15. Nanda R.S. Growth changes in skeletal-facial profile and their significance in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod 59 (1971) 501-513
16. Binder R.C. The geometry of cephalometrics. J Clin Orthod 13 (1979) 258-263
17. Oktay H. A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 99 (1991) 122-128
18. McNamara Jr. J.A. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 86 (1984) 449-469
19. Nanda R.S., and Merrill R.M. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105 (1994) 328-344
20. Hall-Scott J. The maxillary-mandibular planes angle (MM degrees) bisector. a new reference plane for anteroposterior measurement of the dental bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 105 (1994) 583-591
21. Ferrario V.F., Serrao G., Ciusa V., Morini M., and Sforza C. Cephalometric and in vivo measurements of maxillomandibular anteroposterior discrepancies. a preliminary regression study. Angle Orthod 72 (2002) 579-584
22. Bishara S.E., Fahl J.A., and Peterson L.C. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal. clinical implications. Am J Orthod 84 (1983) 133-139
23. Rotberg S., Fried N., Kane J., and Shapiro E. Predicting the "Wits" appraisal from the ANB angle. Am J Orthod 77 (1980) 636-642
24. Järvinen S. The relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle. a statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 94 (1988) 432-435
25. Hurmerinta K., Rahkamo A., and Haavikko K. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. Eur J Oral Sci 105 (1997) 221-227
26. Polk C.E. A new index for evaluating horizontal skeletal discrepancies and predicting treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124 (2003) 663-669
27. Millett D., and Gravely J.F. Assessment of anteroposterior dental base relationships. Br J Orthod 18 (1991) 285-297
28. Robertson N.R.E. The "Wits" appraisal of a sample of the South Wales population. Br J Orthod 7 (1980) 183-184
29. Järvinen S. A comparison of two angular and two linear measurements used to establish sagittal apical base relationship. Eur J Orthod 3 (1981) 131-134
30. Richardson M. Measurement of dental base relationship. Eur J Orthod 4 (1982) 251-256
31. Haynes S., and Chau M.N.Y. The reproducibility and repeatability of the Wits analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 107 (1995) 640-647
32. Rushton R., Cohen A.M., and Linney A.D. The relationship and reproducibility of angle ANB and the Wits appraisal. Br J Orthod 18 (1991) 225-231
33. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students (1940), George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London
34. Holdaway R.A. Changes in relationship of points A and B during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 42 (1956) 176-193
35. Walker G.F., and Kowalski C.J. The distribution of the ANB angle in "normal" individuals. Angle Orthod 41 (1971) 332-335
36. Järvinen S. Floating norms for the ANB angle as guidance for clinical considerations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 90 (1986) 383-387
37. Sherman S.L., Woods M., and Nanda R.S. The longitudinal effects of growth on the Wits appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 93 (1988) 429-439