Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology - Authors' reply

Lancet

Volumn 367, Issue 9521, 2006, Pages 1482-1483

  Davey, Elizabeth ^a   Barratt, Alexandra ^a   Irwig, Les ^a   Macaskill, Petra ^a   Saville, A Marion ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b VICTORIAN CYTOLOGY SERVICE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; LABORATORY TEST; LETTER; LIQUID BASED CYTOLOGY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY; UTERINE CERVIX DISEASE; CARCINOMA; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

CARCINOMA; CYTOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 33646199926     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68640-6     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Moss S., Gray A., Legood R., and Henstock E. First report to the Department of Health on evaluation of LBC (December 2002). http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/lbc-pilot-evaluation.pdf (accessed March 29, 2006)
2. Cervical Screening Wales. Liquid based cytology-pilot project: project report (2003), Velindre NHS Trust, Cardiff
3. Scottish Cervical Screening Programme. Steering Group report on the feasibility of introducing liquid based cytology. http://www.show.scot.nhs.uk/publicationsindex.htm (accessed March 22, 2006)