On the Identification and Use of Hierarchical Resources in Planning and Scheduling

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, AIPS 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 263-272

  Schattenberg, Bernd ^a   Biundo, Susanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

CRISIS MANAGEMENT; HIERARCHICAL RESOURCE; HIERARCHICAL TASK NETWORKS; NEW APPROACHES; PLANNING AND SCHEDULING; PLANNING APPLICATIONS; REAL-WORLD PLANNING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION PROBLEM; RESOURCES ALLOCATION; STATE ABSTRACTION;

RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 33646198546     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Beck, H., and Tate, A. 1995. Open planning, scheduling and constraint management architectures. British Telecommunication's Technical Journal. Special Issue on Resource Management.
2. Beck, H. 1993. The management of job-shop scheduling constraints in TOSCA. In NSF Workshop on Intelligent and Dynamic Scheduling for Manufacturing Systems, 2-14.
3. Biundo, S., and Schattenberg, B. 2001. From abstract crisis to concrete relief - a preliminary report on combining state abstraction and HTN planning. In Cesta, A., and Borrajo, D., eds., Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Planning (ECP-01), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Toledo, Spain: Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc.
4. Castillo, L.; Fdez-Olivares, J.; and González, A. 2000. A hybrid hierarchical/operator-based planning approach for the design of control programs. In Sauer, J., and Köhler, J., eds., Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2000)Workshop on New Results in Planning, Scheduling and Design.
5. Castillo, L.; Fdez-Olivares, J.; and González, A. 2001. On the adequacy of hierarchical planning characteristics for real-world problem solving. In Cesta, A., and Borrajo, D., eds., Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Planning (ECP-01), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Toledo, Spain: Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc.
6. Chien, S.; Rabideau, G.; Knight, R.; Sherwood, R.; Engelhardt, B.; Mutz, D.; Estlin, T.; Smith, B.; Fisher, F.; Barrett, T.; Stebbins, G.; and Tran, D. 2000. ASPEN - Automated planning and scheduling for space mission operations. In 6th International Symposium on Space missions Operations and Ground Data Systems (SpaceOps 2000).
7. Clement, B. J., and Durfee, E. H. 1999. Theory for coordinating concurrent hierarchical planning agents using summary information. In Proceedings of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99); Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 495-502. Menlo Park, Cal.: AAAI/MIT Press.
8. Clement, B. J.; Barrett, A. C.; Rabideau, G. R.; and Durfee, E. H. 2001. Using abstraction in planning and scheduling. In Cesta, A., and Borrajo, D., eds., Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Planning (ECP-01), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Toledo, Spain: Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc.
9. Drabble, B., and Kirby, R. 1991. Associating A.I. planner entities with an underlying time point network. In Hertzberg, J., ed., Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on AI Planning (EWSP-91), volume 522 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 27-38. St. Augustin, Germany: Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc.
10. Drabble, B., and Tate, A. 1994. The use of optimistic and pessimistic resource profiles to inform search in an activity based planner. In Hammond, K., ed., Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS-94), 243-248. University of Chicago, Illinois, USA: AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, USA.
11. El-Kholy, A., and Richards, B. 1996. Temporal and resource reasoning in planning: The parcPLAN approach. In Wahlster, W., ed., Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-96), 614-618. Budapest, Hungary: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
12. Erol, K.; Hendler, J.; and Nau, D. S. 1994. UMCP: A sound and complete procedure for hierarchical task network planning. In Hammond, K., ed., Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS-94), 88-96. University of Chicago, Illinois, USA: AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, USA.
13. Garcia, F., and Laborie, P. 1996. Hierarchisation of the seach space in temporal planning. In Ghallab, M., and Milani, A., eds., New Directions in AI Planning, Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on AI Planning (EWSP-95), volume 31 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 217-232. Assisi, Italy: IOS Press, Amsterdam, Oxford, Washington DC, Tokyo.
14. Garrido, A.; Salido, M. A.; and Barber, F. 2000. Scheduling in a planning environment. In Sauer, J., and Köhler, J., eds., Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-2000)Workshop on New Results in Planning, Scheduling and Design, 36-43.
15. Koehler, J. 1998. Planning under resource constraints. In Prade, H., ed., Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-98), 489-493. Brighton, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.
16. Laborie, P., and Ghallab, M. 1995a. IxTeT: an integrated approach for plan generation and scheduling. In ETFA-95, 485-495.
17. Laborie, P., and Ghallab, M. 1995b. Planning with sharable resource constraints. In Mellish, C. S., ed., Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), 1643-1651. Montreal, Cananda: Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.
18. Muscettola, N.; Nayak, P. P.; Pell, B.; and Williams, B. C. 1998. Remote agent: to go boldly where no AI system has gone before. Artificial Intelligence 103(1-2):5-47.
19. Muscettola, N. 1994. HSTS: Integrating planning and scheduling. In Zweben, M., and Fox, M., eds., Intelligent Scheduling. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. 169-212. ISBN 1-55860-260-7.
20. Nau, D.; Munoz-Avila, H.; Cao, Y.; Lotem, A.; and Mitchell, S. 2001. Total-order planning with partially ordered subtasks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-01).
21. Rintanen, J., and Jungholt, H. 2000. Numeric state variables in constraint-based planning. In Biundo, S., and Fox, M., eds., Recent Advances in AI Planning, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Planning (ECP-99), volume 1809 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 109-121. Durham, United Kingdom: Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc.
22. Srivastava, B., and Kambhampati, S. 2000. Scaling up planning by teasing out resource scheduling. In Biundo, S., and Fox, M., eds., Recent Advances in AI Planning, Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Planning (ECP-99), volume 1809 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 172-186. Durham, United Kingdom: Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, etc.
23. Stephan, W., and Biundo, S. 1996. Deduction-based refinement planning. In Drabble, B., ed., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS-96), 213-220. Edinburgh, Scotland: AAAI Press, Menlo Park, California, USA.
24. Tate, A.; Drabble, B.; and Kirby, R. 1994. O-Plan2: An architecture for command, planning and control. In Zweben, M., and Fox, M., eds., Intelligent Scheduling. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA. ISBN 1-55860-260-7.
25. Wilkins, D. E. 1988. Practical Planning: Extending the AI Planning Paradigm. San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann. ISBN 0-934613-94-X.
26. Wilkins, D. E. 1999. Using the SIPE-2 Planning System: A Manual for SIPE-2, Version 6.1. SRI International Artificial Intelligence Center, 333 Ravenswood Ave., Menlo Park, California 94025.