Deceptive arguments containing persuasive language and persuasive definitions

Argumentation

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 159-186

  Walton, Douglas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646196428     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-005-2312-y     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aberdein, A.: 2000, "Persuasive Definition', in C. W. Tindale, H. V. Hansen and E. Sveda, (eds.), Argumentation at the Century's Turn CD ROM, OSSA (Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation) Proceedings.
2. Aomi, J. 1985. 'Persuasive Definitions in Social Sciences and Social Thought'. pp. 187-190 In: E. Bulygin, J.-L Gardies, I. Niiniluoto (ed.), Man, Law and Modern Forms of Life. Reidel, Dordrecht.
3. Bench-Capon, T.: 2002, 'Agreeing to Differ: Modelling Persuasive Dialogue between Parties with Different Values', Informal Logic 22, 231-245, Available on the internet: http://www.csc.liv.ac.uk/~tbc/projects/ifl.pdf.
4. Bentham, J. 1969. 'The Book of Fallacies'. In: M. P. Mack (ed.), The Bentham Reader. Pegasus, New York.
5. Brown, J. R.: 1998, 'What is a Definition?', Foundations of Science 1, 111-132.
6. Burgess-Jackson, K.: 1995, 'Rape and Persuasive Definition', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25, 415-454.
7. Cleland, C. E. and C. F. Chyba: 2002, 'Defining 'Life", Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere 32, 387-393.
8. Copi, I. M. and C. Cohen: 2001, Introduction to Logic, 11 (ed.) Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.
9. Davidson, W. L.: 1885. The Logic of Definition, Longmans Green & Co., London.
10. Fetzer, J. H., D. Shatz and G. N. Schlesinger: 1991, Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
11. Gorsky, D. P.: 1974, Definition, Progress Publishers, Moscow.
12. Grasso, F., A. Cawsey and R. Jones: 2000. Dialectical Argumentation to Solve Conflicts in Advice Giving: A Case Study in the Promotion of Healthy Nutrition, International Journal of Human - Computer Studies 53, 1077-1115.
13. Hallden, S.: 1960, True Love, True Humour and True Religion: A Semantic Study, Lund, Gleerlup.
14. Hurley, P. J.: 2000, A Concise Introduction to Logic, 1 (ed.) Wadsworth, Belmont California.
15. James, H. S. Jr.: 2002, 'When is a Bribe a Bribe? Teaching a Workable Definition of Bribery', Teaching Business Ethics 6, 199-217.
16. Johnstone, H. W. Jr.: 1959, Philosophy and Argument, The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park Pennsylvania.
17. Joyce, G. F.: 1994, 'Forward', In: D. W. Deamer and G.R. Fleischaker (eds.), Origins of Life: The Central Concepts, Jones and Bartlett, Boston.
18. Loux, M. J.: 1999. 'Essentialism'. pp. 281-283 In: R. Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 2 (ed.) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
19. Ogden, C. K. and I. A. Richards: 1959, The Meaning of Meaning, Harcourt Brace, New York(first pub. 1923).
20. Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1969, The New Rhetoric, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame.
21. Quine, W. O.: 1971, From a Logical Point of View, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
22. Reed, C. :1998. 'Dialogue Frames in Agent Communication', pp. 246-253 In: Y. Demazeau (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems. IEEE Press.
23. Robinson, R.: 1950, Definition, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
24. Robinson, R.: 1953, Plato's Earlier Dialectic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
25. Schiappa, E., 1996. 'Towards a Pragmatic Approach to Definition: "Wetlands" and the Politics of Meaning', pp. 209-230 In: A. Light, E. Katz (ed.), Environmental Pragmatism. Routledge, London.
26. Schiappa, E.: 2003, Defining Reality: Definitions and the Politics of Meaning, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.
27. Shepard, D. W.: 1973, 'Stipulative Definitions and Elementary Logic', Central States Speech Journal 24, 131-136.
28. Singh, M. P.: 1998, 'Agent Communication Languages: Rethinking the Principles', Computer 31, 425-445.
29. Singh, M. P.: 1999, 'A Semantics for Speech Acts', Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 8, 47-71.
30. Singh, M. P., 2000. 'A Social Semantics for Agent Communication Languages", pp. 31-45 In: F. Dignum, M. Greaves (ed.), Issuesin Agent Communication. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
31. Stevenson, C. L.: 1938. Persuasive Definitions, Mind 47, 331-350.
32. Stevenson, C. L.: 1944, Ethics and Language, Yale University Press, New Haven.
33. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1984, Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris, Dordrecht.
34. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1992, Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies, Erlbaum, Hillsdale N.J.
35. Viskil, E.: 1994, Definieren, Ph.D. Dissertation in Speech Communication, University of Amsterdam, with summary in English.
36. Viskil, E., 1995. Defending Definitions: A Pragma-Dialectical Approach, pp. 428-438, In: F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair. and C. A. Willard (ed.), Perspectives and Approaches: Proceedings of the Third ISSA Conference on Argumentation. Amsterdam Sic Sat.
37. Walton, D.: 1998, The New Dialectic, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
38. Walton, D.: 2002, Legal Argumentation and Evidence, University Park, PA., Pennsylvania State Press.
39. Walton, D. and E. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue, State University of New York Press, Albany, New York.
40. Whitehead, A. N. and B. Russell: 1927, Principia Mathematica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Zarefsky, D. 1997. 'Definitions', pp. 1 -11 In: J. F. Klumpp (ed.), Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques. National Communication Association, Annandale, VA.
42. Zarefsky, D., C. Miller-Tutzauer and F. E. Tutzauer: 1984, Reagan's Safety Net for the Truly Needy: The Rhetorical Uses of Definition, Central States Speech Journal 35, 113-119.