Commentary

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 129, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Johnston Jr , Lysle E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646181052     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.001     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Meikle M.C. What do prospective randomized clinical trials tell us about the treatment of Class II malocclusions? A personal viewpoint. Eur J Orthod 27 (2005) 105-114
2. McNamara Jr. J.A. Components of a Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 51 (1981) 177-202
3. Chen J.Y., Will L.A., and Niederman R. Analysis of efficacy of functional appliances on mandibular growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 (2002) 470-476
4. Ghafari J., Shofer F.S., Jacobsson-Hunt U., Markowitz D.L., and Laster L.L. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 51-61
5. Baumrind S., Korn E.L., Molthen R., and West E.E. Changes in facial dimensions associated with the use of forces to retract the maxilla. Am J Orthod 80 (1981) 17-30
6. Keeling S.D., Wheeler T.T., King G.J., Garvan C.W., Cohen D.A., Cabassa S., et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatmement with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 113 (1998) 40-50
7. Johnston Jr. L.E. Functional appliances. a mortgage on mandibular position. Aust Orthod J 14 (1996) 154-156
8. Johnston Jr. L.E. Growing jaws for fun and profit. a modest proposal. In: McNamara Jr. J.A. (Ed). What works, what doesn't, and why. Monograph 35. Craniofacial Growth Series (1998), Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 63-86
9. Jakobsson S.O. Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division 1 malocclusions. Am J Orthod 53 (1967) 446-457
10. Pancherz H., and Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment. a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod 8 (1986) 215-228
11. Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 104 (1993) 319-329
12. Lande M.J. Growth of the bony facial profile. Angle Orthod 22 (1952) 78-90
13. Johnston Jr. L.E. A comparative analysis of Class II treatments. In: Vig P.S., and Ribbens K.A. (Eds). Science and clinical judgment in orthodontics. Monograph 19. Craniofacial Growth Series (1986), Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 103-148
14. Johnston Jr. L.E. Growth and the Class II patient. rendering unto Caesar. Semin Orthod 4 (1998) 59-62
15. Pancherz H. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment. Am J Orthod 85 (1984) 125-134
16. Pancherz H., and Fackel U. The skeletofacial growth pattern pre- and post-dentofacial orthopaedics. A long-term study of Class II malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod 12 (1990) 209-218
17. Pancherz H., and Littmann C. Morphologie und lage des unterkiefers bei der herbst-behandlung. Eine kephalometrische analyse der veränderungen bis zum wachstumsabschluss. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 21 (1989) 493-513
18. Cozza P., De Toffol L., and Colagrossi S. Dentoskeletal effects and facial changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod 26 (2004) 293-302
19. Lamparski D.G. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae (1972), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh [thesis]