Leading change: Retrospective evaluation of a nurse-led initiative in vascular access options for autologous stem cell transplant recipients ranging from Hickman catheters to peripherally inserted central catheters

Journal of Infusion Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 81-88

  McDiarmid, Sheryl ^a   Hamelin, Linda ^a   Huebsch, L B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; BACTEREMIA; CATHETER REMOVAL; CELLULITIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LIMB SWELLING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NURSING CARE; PAIN; PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; PHLEBITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THROMBOSIS; VASCULAR ACCESS; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; CANADA; CATHETERIZATION; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS INFECTION; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; INDWELLING CATHETER; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING; PATIENT SELECTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CANADA; CATHETERIZATION, CENTRAL VENOUS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; CATHETERS, INDWELLING; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; CROSS INFECTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SELECTION; PHLEBITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; THROMBOSIS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646178139     PISSN: 15331458     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00129804-200603000-00005     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. McDiarmid S, Bredeson C, Huebsch L. Selection of appropriate venous access for the collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells by experienced apheresis nurses. J Clin Apheresis. 1999; 14(2):51-57.
2. Hickman RO, Buckner CD, Clift R, Sanders, JE, Thomas ED. A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;148(6):871-875.
3. Ulz L, Petersen FB, Ford R, et al. A prospective study of complications in Hickman right-atrial catheters in marrow transplant patients. J Parent Enteral Nutr. 1990;14(1):27-30.
4. Solomon B, Moore J, Arthur C, Prince HM. Lack of efficacy of twice-weekly urokinase in the prevention of complications associated with Hickman catheters: a multicentre randomized comparison of urokinase versus heparin. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37(18): 2379-2384.
5. Press OW, Ramsey PG, Larson EB, Fefer A, Hickman RO. Hickman catheter infections in patients with malignancies. Medicine. 1984;63(4):189-200.
6. Kumagai T, Sakamake H, Tanikawa S, et al. Utility and safety of Hickman catheters for venous access after bone marrow transplantation. Int Med. 1998;37(3):286-291.
7. Horattas MC, Trupiano J, Hopkins MD, Pasini D, Martino C, Murty A. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings. Am J Infect Control. 2001;29:32-40.
8. Haire WD, Liebermann RP, Lund GB, Endey JA, Kessinger A, Armitage J. Thrombotic complications of silicone rubber catheters during autologous marrow and peripheral stem cell transplantation: prospective comparison of Hickman and Groshong catheters. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 1991;7(1):57-59.
9. Asch R. Venous access: options, approaches, and issues. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2001;52(3):53-164.
10. Teichgraber UK, Gebauer B, Benter T, Wagner HJ. Central venous access catheters: radiological management of complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26(4):321-333.
11. Penney-Timmons E, Sevedge S. Outcome data for peripherally inserted central catheters used in an acute care setting. J Infus Nurs. 2004;27(6):431-436.
12. Gabriel J. An intravenous alternative. Nurs Times. 1994;90(31):39-41.
13. Ryder M. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Nurs Clin North Am. 1993;28(4):937-971.
14. Abi-Nader J. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critical care patients. Heart Lung. 1993;22(5):428-434.
15. Griffiths VR, Philpot P. Peripheral IV catheters (PICCs): do they have a role in the care of the critically ill patient? Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2002;18:37-40.
16. Walshe LJ, Malak SF, Eagan J, Sepkowitz K. Complication rates among cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheters. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(15):3276-3281.
17. Cortelezzi A, Fracchiolla NS, Maisonneuve P, et al. Central venous catheter-related complications in patients with hematological malignancies. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44(9):1495-1501.
18. Harter C, Ostendorf T, Bach A, Egerer G, Goldschmidt H, Ho AD. Peripherally inserted central venous catheters for autologous blood progenitor cell transplantation in patients with haematological malignancies. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11:790-794.
19. Bard Access Systems. Peripherally inserted central catheters: selection, insertion and management (pamphlet). Salt Lake City, Utah: Bard.
20. Rummel MA, Donnelly PJ, Fortenbaugh CC. Clinical evaluation of a positive pressure device to prevent central venous catheter occlusions: results of a pilot study. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2001;5(6):261-265.
21. Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sheretz RJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;32:1249.