Pilot-scale demonstration of pre-fermentation for enhancement of food-processing wastewater biodegradibility

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 580-587

  Xu, Zhongda ^a   Nakhla, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Anaerobic aerobic system; Pilot scale; Pre fermentation; Tomato processing wastewater; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

AMMONIA; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FERMENTATION; FOOD PROCESSING; PHOSPHORUS; REMOVAL; ULTRAFILTRATION;

ANAEROBIC/AEROBIC SYSTEM; PILOT SCALE; PRE-FERMENTATION; TOMATO-PROCESSING WASTEWATER;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

AMMONIA; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORUS; WATER;

AMMONIA; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FERMENTATION; FOOD PROCESSING; PHOSPHORUS; REMOVAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIODEGRADABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERMENTATION; FOOD PROCESSING; RESPIROMETRY; TIME; TOMATO; ULTRAFILTRATION; WASTE WATER;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM;

EID: 33646177672     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.1432     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Rao AV, Waseem Z and Agarwal S, Lycopene content of tomatoes and tomato products and their contribution to dietary lycopene. Food Res Int 31:737-741 (1998).
2. Crites RW, Lynard WG and Hatch HL, Land treatment of cannery wastes, J Water Poll Cont Fed 51:808-814 (1979).
3. Eremektar G, Randall AA and McCue T, Effect of prefermentation on inert COD fractions in BNR systems. Fresenius Environ Bull 13:1033-1035 (2004).
4. McCue T, Shah R, Vassiliev I, Liu Y, Eremektar FG, Chen Y and Randall AA, Evaluation of influent prefermentation as a unit process upon biological nutrient removal. Water Sci Technol 47:9-15 (2003).
5. McCue T, Naik R, Zepeda M, Liu Y, Vassiliev I and Randall AA, Changes in anoxic denitrification rate resulting from prefermentation of a septic, phosphorus-limited wastewater. Water Environ Res 76:23-28 (2004).
6. Randall AA, Naik R, Zepeda M, McCue T, Liu Y and Vassiliev I, Changes in anoxic denitrification rate due to prefermentation of a septic, phosphorus limited, wastewater, in WEFTEC 2000, 73rd Annual Conference and Exposition on Water Quality and Wastewater Treatment, Anaheim, CA, pp 3458-3467 (14-18 October (2000)).
7. Munch EV, Keller J, Newell RB and Lant PA, Application of prefermenters to aid biological nutrient removal from domestic wastewater, in Sustainable Energy Environ Technol, Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Conference, Singapore, pp 41-48 (19-21 June (1996)).
8. Merzouki M, Bernet N, Delgenes JP and Benlemlih M, Effect of prefermentation on denitrifying phosphorus removal in slaughterhouse wastewater. Biores Technol 96:1317-1322 (2005).
9. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (18th edn). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC (1992).
10. Orhon D, Yildiz G, Cokgor EU and Sozen S, Respirometric evaluation of the biodegradability of confectionary wastewaters. Water Sci Technol 32:11-19 (1995).
11. Kappeler J and Gujer W, Estimation of kinetic parameters of heterotrophic biomass under aerobic conditions and characterization of wastewater for activated sludge modelling. Water Sci Technol 25:125-139 (1992).
12. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL and Stensel HD, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse (4th edn), McGraw-Hill, pp 506, 615, 623 (2003).
13. Rodrigues AM and Santos Oliveira JF, Treatment of wastewaters from the tomato concentrate industry in high rate algal ponds. Water Sci Technol 19:43-49.
14. Leoni C, Grischott F, Fortini G and Costabile P, Use of a trickling filter with plastic medium in the treatment of wastewaters from a tomato processing factory (in Italian). Industria Conserve 61:252-259 (1986).
15. Wilson RW and Murphy KL, RBC pretreatment of tomato processing wastewater, in 7th Annual WWEMA Industrial Pollution Conference, pp 205-216 (1979).