Improving elementary school science teaching by cross-level mentoring

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 55-67

  Feldman, Arnold I ^a   Campbell, Robert L ^a   Lai, Morris K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646161632     PISSN: 1046560X     EISSN: 15731847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1009476730254     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. VIII. Implementing and sustaining innovations. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
2. Bennett, B. (1987). The effectiveness of staff development practices: A meta-analysis. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oregon, 1987). UMI Dissertation Services, 87-21226.
3. Cavallaro, C. C., Stowitschek, C. E., George, M., & Stowitschek, J. J. (1980). Intensive inservice teacher education and concomitant changes in handicapped learners. Teacher Education and Special Education, 3, 49-57.
4. Duschl, R. A. (1983). The elementary level science methods courses; breeding ground of an apprehension towards science? A case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 745-754.
5. Gabel, D., & Rubba, P. (1979). Attitude changes of elementary teachers according to the curriculum studied during workshop participation and their role as model science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 16, 19-24.
6. Hindman, S. E., & Polgrove, L. (1988). Differential effects of feedback on preservice teacher behavior. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 25-29.
7. James, R. K., & Hord, S. M. (1988). Implementing elementary school science programs. School Science and Mathematics, 88, 315-334.
8. Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
9. Lawrence, G. (1974). Patterns of effective inservice education: A state of the art summary of research on materials and procedures for changing teacher behaviors in inservice education. Tallahassee: Florida State Department of Education.
10. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11. Shrigley, R. (1977). The function of professional reinforcement in supporting a more positive attitude of elementary teachers toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 317-322.
12. Showers, B., Joyce, B., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 77-87.
13. Sparks, G. M. (1984/85). The trees or the forest? A response to Ruth Wade. Educational Leadership, 42(4), 55-58.
14. Tilgner, P. J. (1990). Avoiding science in the elementary school. Science Education, 74, 421-431.
15. Wade, R. K. (1984/85). What makes a difference in service teacher education? A meta-analysis of research. Educational Leadership, 42(4), 48-54
16. Weiss, I. R. (1987). Report of the 1985-86 national survey of science and mathematics education. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
17. Weiss, I. R. (1994). A profile of science and mathematics education in the United States: 1993. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research.
18. Wood, F. H., & Thompson, S. R. (1980). Guidelines for better staff development. Educational Leadership, 37(5), 374-378.