Effect of tactile feedback on movement speed and precision during work-related tasks using a computer mouse

Human Factors

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 816-826

  Viau, Antonin ^a,c   Najm, Micheline ^a,d   Chapman, C Elaine ^a   Levin, Mindy F ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d Physiotherapy Clinic of Pointe Claire   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ERROR ANALYSIS; FEEDBACK; MICE (COMPUTER PERIPHERALS); PERFORMANCE;

MOVEMENT ACCURACY; PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT; TACTILE FEEDBACK;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER MOUSE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; RESEARCH; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH;

ADULT; AGING; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; COMPUTERS; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORK;

EID: 33646155566     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/001872005775571023     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Akamatsu, M., & MacKenzie, I. S. (1996). Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 483-493.
2. Akamatsu, M., MacKenzie, I. S., & Hasbrouc, T. (1995). A comparison of tactile, auditory and visual feedback in a pointing task using a mouse-type device. Ergonomics, 38, 816-827.
3. Dalpozzo, F., Gérard, P., De Pasqua, V., Wang, F., & de Noordhout, A. M. (2002). Single motor axon conduction velocities of human upper and lower limb motor units: A study with transcranial electrical stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 284-291.
4. Dennerlein, J. T., & Yang, M. C. (2001). Haptic force-feedback devices for the office computer: Performance and musculoskeletal issues. Human Factors, 43, 278-286.
5. Eimer, M., Cockburn, D., Smedley, B., & Driver, J. (2001). Cross-modal links in endogenous spatial attention are mediated by common external locations: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 398-411.
6. Gray, R., & Tan, H. Z. (2002). Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision. Experimental Brain Research, 145, 50-55.
7. Kennett, S., Eimer, M., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2001). Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: Convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 462-478.
8. Kitazawa, S., Kohno, T., & Uka, T. (1995). Effects of delayed visual information on the rate and amount of prism adaptation in the human. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 7644-7652.
9. Kontarinis, D. A., & Howe, R. D. (1995). Tactile display of vibratory information in teleoperation and virtual environments. Presence, 4, 387-402.
10. Laursen, B., Jensen, B. R., & Ratkevicius, A. (2001). Performance and muscle activity during computer mouse tasks in young and elderly adults. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 84, 329-336.
11. Mattay, V. S., Fera, F., Tessitore, A., Hariri, A. R., Das, S., Callicott, J. H., et al. (2002). Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in human motor function. Neurology, 58, 630-635.
12. Meftah, E.-M., Shenasa, J., & Chapman, C. E. (2002). Effects of a cross-modal manipulation of attention on somatosensory cortical neuronal responses to tactile stimuli in the monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 3133-3149.
13. Miall, R. C., Weir, D. J., & Stein, J. F. (1985). Visuomotor tracking with delayed visual feedback. Neuroscience, 16, 511-520.
14. Okamura, A. T., Cutkosky, M. R., & Dennerlein, J. T. (2001). Reality-based models for vibration feedback in virtual environments. ASME/IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics, 6, 245-253.
15. Post, L. J., & Chapman, C. E. (1991). The influence of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the detection of vibrotactile stimuli in humans. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 8, 149-157.
16. Reed, D. W., Liu, X., & Miall, R. C. (2003). On-line feedback control of human visually guided slow ramp tracking: Effects of spatial separation of visual cues. Neuroscience Letters, 338, 209-212.
17. Rubichi, S., Neir, M., & Nicoletti, R. (1999). Age-related slowing of control processes: Evidence from a response coordination task. Cortex, 35, 573-582.
18. Sit, R. A., & Fisk, A. D. (1999). Age-related performance in a multiple-task environment. Human Factors, 41, 26-34.
19. Skinner, H. B., Barrack, R. L., & Cook, S. D. (1984). Age-related decline in proprioception. Clinical Orthopaedics, 184, 208-211.
20. Smith, C. D., Umberger, G. H., Manning, E. L., Slevin, J. T., Wekstein, D. R., Schmitt, F. A., et al. (1999). Critical decline in fine motor hand movements in human aging. Neurology, 53, 1458-1461.
21. Smith, M. W., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. J. (1999). Aging, motor control, and the performance of computer mouse tasks. Human Factors, 41, 389-396.
22. Spence, C., Pavani, F., & Driver, J. (2000). Crossmodal links between vision and touch in covert endogenous spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1298-1319.
23. Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212-215.
24. Valeriani, M., Ranghi, F., & Giaquinto S. (2003). The effects of aging on selective attention to touch: A reduced inhibitory control in elderly subjects? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 49, 75-87.
25. Vandervoort, A. A. (2002). Aging of the human neuromuscular system. Muscle and Nerve, 25, 17-25.
26. Verillo, R. T. (1979). Changes in vibrotactile thresholds as a function of age. Sensory Processes, 3, 49-59.
27. Wang, F., De Pasqua, V., & Delwaide, P. J. (1999). Age-related changes in fastest and slowest conducting axons of thenar motor units. Muscle and Nerve, 22, 1022-1029.
28. Williams, G. N., Higgins, M. J., & Lewek, M. D. (2002). Aging skeletal muscle: Physiologic changes and the effects of training. Physical Therapy, 82, 62-68.
29. Zompa, I. C., & Chapman, C. E. (1995). Effects of cross-modal manipulations of attention on the ability of human subjects to discriminate changes in texture. Somatosensory and Motor Research, 12, 87-102.